12.07.2015 Views

Examen corrigé Université de Montréal Thèse numérique Papyrus ...

Examen corrigé Université de Montréal Thèse numérique Papyrus ...

Examen corrigé Université de Montréal Thèse numérique Papyrus ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

244This brings one, finally, to Anouar Majid’s argument in Unveiling Traditions:Postcolonial Islam in a Polycentric World 71 that there is a strong affinity between secularism andcapitalism. Secularism, a post-Enlightenment i<strong>de</strong>ology, reduces religious thought tofundamentalism, which is the excess the system wants to eradicate. The hegemony ofmo<strong>de</strong>rnization and secularism preclu<strong>de</strong>s any plausible un<strong>de</strong>rstanding of the Orient and other non-Western societies. Majid states that “the project of <strong>de</strong>monizing Muslim others meets variousinterwoven i<strong>de</strong>ological needs, including the control of third world resources and persuadingcitizens of Western societies, through manipulated differentiation and consent, that they aremembers of a superior civilization” (138). Melville’s mo<strong>de</strong>rnization program, however, is part ofa larger program that tries to tame the Orient and re<strong>de</strong>fine Islam.Majid argues that Orientalism and Enlightenment i<strong>de</strong>als are all formulated in aEurocentric paradigm which is i<strong>de</strong>ologically and historically associated with capitalism. He positsthat “postcolonial theory has been particularly inattentive to the question of Islam in the globaleconomy” (19). Secularism and utopian cosmopolitanism as advocated by Said are, according toMajid, i<strong>de</strong>alistic concepts that cannot withstand the capitalist system. He thinks that “the status[Said] confers on the migrant or the exile as the best situated intellectual and contrapuntal rea<strong>de</strong>rof culture in the age of global capitalism” is not convincing since postcolonial intellectuals, whoare insi<strong>de</strong> capital and outsi<strong>de</strong> the realm of the outsi<strong>de</strong>r looking in, are but products of Westernimperialism. When the postcolonial intellectual does not put into question his/her secularassumptions, s/he cannot speak for and in terms of his/her society. Staging this inability to speakas a missed encounter, Orientalism portrays this failed encounter as discontinuity, subscribing tothe Foucauldian conception of the individual as an effect of power relations.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!