12.07.2015 Views

Examen corrigé Université de Montréal Thèse numérique Papyrus ...

Examen corrigé Université de Montréal Thèse numérique Papyrus ...

Examen corrigé Université de Montréal Thèse numérique Papyrus ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

16Fundamental Concepts 61), the reinterpretation of the Fort/Da game and its association withobjet a and repetition. Lacan’s child is “traumatized by the fact that [he] was going away <strong>de</strong>spitethe appeal, precociously adumbrated in [the child’s] voice” (Four Fundamental Concepts 63).Yet the missed encounter is located primarily in the domain of the grieving father, who has failedto witness the “second <strong>de</strong>ath” of his child occasioned by the falling candle. The original trauma(the child’s <strong>de</strong>ath), beyond the father’s ability to assimilate in the Symbolic, is thus repeated. Weshould remember that Lacan’s context is repetition, and within this overarching context hepresents the function of the automaton and the tuché. He outlines the tuché by summarizing thedream of the burning child. At issue is how the father misses (again) the trauma that he cannotsymbolize. Its poetics are essentially prosopoetic: the father dreams that the <strong>de</strong>ad child is arevenant, who says to him “can’t you see that I’m burning?” This is the juncture, and thepuncture, of the tuché. The following Lacanian questions are very crucial to the un<strong>de</strong>rstanding ofrepetition and the missed encounter/appointment:What, then, is this function of traumatic repetition if nothing—quite the reverse—seemsto justify it from the point of view of the pleasure principle? To master the painful event,someone may say—but who masters, where is the master here, to be mastered? Whyspeak so hastily when we do not know precisely where to situate the agency that wouldun<strong>de</strong>rtake this operation of mastery? (The Four Fundamental Concepts 51)In other words, “This requirement of a distinct consistency in the <strong>de</strong>tails of its telling signifiesthat the realization of the signifier will never be able to be careful enough in its memorization tosucceed in <strong>de</strong>signating the primacy of the significance as such” (The Four Fundamental Concepts61; emphasis mine). Significance, therefore, is not the equivalent of the signifier; rather, it stands

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!