12.07.2015 Views

Examen corrigé Université de Montréal Thèse numérique Papyrus ...

Examen corrigé Université de Montréal Thèse numérique Papyrus ...

Examen corrigé Université de Montréal Thèse numérique Papyrus ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

208absence. Why do we need the concept of the letter, since the sign-system itself could beun<strong>de</strong>rstood in relation to trace and absence? Surely because there is some overarching “address”in the sign system, an “address” seeking an addressee and a <strong>de</strong>stination. The inability to pin downthe Leviathan lies at the bor<strong>de</strong>rline between the doublecomprising its narcissistic rebuses,excesses, and regressionsand the aporias of language. In Moby-Dick, the impossibility ofrepresentation is presented as a phantasmic and phantomatic regression to a missed primalexperience and a projection of this impossibility on the double. One should be properly aware ofthe differences and similarities between doubling and supplementarity, since although they aredistinct things, they sha<strong>de</strong> into each other in certain places in the narrative. The business ofdoubling and the double manifests in diverse ways. Thus, one can speak of Ahab and his doubles,refer to the economy of repetition, and gesture toward the doubling that occurs at the archivalbeginning of the text. All of these are part of the larger economy of doubling. This leads me thento the matter of the whale: I do not think the whale is ‘doubled,’ but rather, the whale is the point<strong>de</strong> caption around which all the economy of doubling is <strong>de</strong>veloped. As point <strong>de</strong> caption, thewhale serves as the ‘object’ to which the doubling economy gestures or points, but of course it isitself beyond our grasp. In this sense, then, all doubling is a form of supplementarity.The “Cetology” chapter, <strong>de</strong>constructive as it is, puts the whole narrative quest forcompleteness un<strong>de</strong>r erasure and confirms the supplementarity of the narrative scenes. We learnthat the White Whale goes beyond the discourse of science. To un<strong>de</strong>rstand the whale’shieroglyphics, Ishmael refers to popular sciences of the mid nineteenth century such asphysiognomy and phrenology. Yet, all these analyses arrive at the inescapable in<strong>de</strong>terminacy ofthe whale’s head. Ishmael anasemically reverts to another discourse when he invokes Jonas.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!