12.07.2015 Views

Examen corrigé Université de Montréal Thèse numérique Papyrus ...

Examen corrigé Université de Montréal Thèse numérique Papyrus ...

Examen corrigé Université de Montréal Thèse numérique Papyrus ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

213Derrida, referring to the obscuring and supplementary effects of writing). In “The Fountain”chapter, which <strong>de</strong>scribes the phenomenon of the whale’s sprout, we learn that the whale lives inintervals and that “he carries a surplus stock of vitality in him, just as the camel crossing thewaterless <strong>de</strong>sert carries a surplus supply of drink for future use in its four supplementarystomachs” (356). The in<strong>de</strong>finite nature of the whale’s mysterious mist <strong>de</strong>fines the whole nature ofthe narrative and the whale. In Plato’s The Republic, we see a clear <strong>de</strong>finition of the pharmakon. 63As Derrida argues in his Dissemination, “contrary to life, writingor, if you will, thepharmakoncan only displace or even aggravate the ill. Such will be, in its logical outlines, theobjection the king raises to writing: un<strong>de</strong>r pretext of supplementing memory, writing makes oneeven more forgetful; far from increasing knowledge, it disseminates it” (102). The in<strong>de</strong>cision andinscrutability that characterize the pharmakon are clearly present in Moby-Dick: “Speak out! Youhave seen him spout; then <strong>de</strong>clare what the spout is; can you not tell water from air? My <strong>de</strong>ar sir,in this world it is not so easy to settle these plain things. And as for this whale spout, you mightalmost stand in it, and yet be un<strong>de</strong>ci<strong>de</strong>d as to what it is precisely” (358). We first learn the sproutcould be beneficial and in this chapter the narrator tells us that “the spout is poisonous”. Irwinargues: “Melville … link[s] the uncertainty of human verification and the in<strong>de</strong>finiteness of theveil of mist to the in<strong>de</strong>terminacy of self-reflective thought as it attempts to <strong>de</strong>al with the notion ofeternity, with the survival of the self as a linguistic (that is, repetitive) entity in a condition ofatemporality” (291-2). The inability to <strong>de</strong>fine the nature of the spout reflects the inscrutability andun<strong>de</strong>cidability that structure the narrativecharacteristics that shape the dialectics of thepharmakon. The pharmakon is also referred to as the perfume that conceals “the <strong>de</strong>ad un<strong>de</strong>r theappearance of the living” (Dissemination 142). We see that the pharmakon, like Moby-Dick, is

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!