13.07.2015 Views

US Training of Death Squads in Iraq? - War Is A Crime .org

US Training of Death Squads in Iraq? - War Is A Crime .org

US Training of Death Squads in Iraq? - War Is A Crime .org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

e<strong>in</strong>g arrested by the <strong>Iraq</strong>i police on 19 September by a phalanx <strong>of</strong> tanks and helicopter gunshipsthat stormed the police station where the two undercover soldiers were be<strong>in</strong>g held after theyallegedly failed to stop at an <strong>Iraq</strong>i police roadblock and subsequently opened fire on the <strong>Iraq</strong>ipolice, kill<strong>in</strong>g one and wound<strong>in</strong>g another.The car they were travell<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> was loaded with weapons <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g allegedly, assault rifles, alight mach<strong>in</strong>e gun, an anti-tank weapon, radio gear and a medical kit (’standard’ SAS issueaccord<strong>in</strong>g to the BBC). Accord<strong>in</strong>g to at least two reports, the car they were travel<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> (AToyota Cressida) was “booby-trapped”.Subsequent accounts vary accord<strong>in</strong>g to the source but accord<strong>in</strong>g to the <strong>in</strong>itial story broadcast onthe BBC (19/9/05), the two men wore traditional Arab dress but then this changed to “civiliandress” (BBC TV News).As more <strong>in</strong>formation trickled out, a BBC story reported that the men were freed after the policestation had been attacked by British tanks, a report that the British government <strong>in</strong>itially deniedsay<strong>in</strong>g that “the release <strong>of</strong> the soldiers had been negotiated” (BBC Website 20/0/05).Brita<strong>in</strong>’s M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> Defence says the release <strong>of</strong> the two soldiers had been negotiated and it didnot believe the prison had been stormed.“We’ve heard noth<strong>in</strong>g to suggest we stormed the prison,” a m<strong>in</strong>istry spokesman said.“We understand there were negotiations.”Lisa Glover, spokeswoman for the British embassy <strong>in</strong> Baghdad, says three people have beenwounded <strong>in</strong> the operation to free the soldiers.She did not give further details <strong>of</strong> how the soldiers were freed.Then the story changed yet aga<strong>in</strong>, only now the ‘<strong>of</strong>ficial’ story, dutifully reported by the BritishState Broadcast<strong>in</strong>g Company (BSBC), was that “negotiations broke down” and that the two menwere <strong>in</strong> the hands <strong>of</strong> the Mehdi Army <strong>in</strong> another build<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong> which case, why was the policestation stormed?Then yet another version was issued by the British government only now the police station was<strong>in</strong>deed attacked but only after “negotiations broke down”. So were the two SAS men <strong>in</strong> thepolice station or not?Accord<strong>in</strong>g to yet another BSBC report, after break<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to the police station, the Brits discoveredthat they had been moved to a Mehdi Army house for “<strong>in</strong>terrogation”. Yet subsequent accountsrevealed that they had <strong>in</strong> fact, been <strong>in</strong> the police station all along and, accord<strong>in</strong>g to a CNN report,were be<strong>in</strong>g questioned by an <strong>Iraq</strong>i judge, not, as the British government alleged, by the‘<strong>in</strong>surgents’.217

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!