The ATP Group Annual Report 2012

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Management's Review Business Model Risk Pension Hedging and Investment Hedging Investment Administration Social Responsibility The ATP Group Financial StatementsNote 44 ATP risk factors and their impact on the bonus potential (after tax)EventImpacton assetsImpact onguaranteedbenefitsTotal impactonbonus potentialDKK billion DKK billion DKK billionInterest-rate increase of 0.7 percentage points (59.2) 59.6 0.5Interest-rate fall of 0.7 percentage points 68.1 (70.9) (2.9)Equity-price fall of 12 percentage points (7.4) - (7.4)Property-price fall of 8 percentage points (1.5) - (1.5)Exchange-rate change with 1-per-cent probability over 10 days (0.1) - (0.1)Counterparty loss of 8 percentage points (5.1) - (5.1)Country-spread risk 1.2 - 1.2Commodity-price fall of 18 percentage points (1.1) - (1.1)Mortality-rate fall of 10 per cent - 19.8 (19.8)Mortality-rate increase of 10 per cent - (17.9) 17.9Note: The impact on assets and the value of guaranteed benefits, as well as the overall impact on the bonus potential is calculated foreach event. The impact of each event in the table is calculated based on a ceteris paribus consideration on the basis of the closing balancesheet as specified in the financial statements. It is assumed that the individual events occur as events with immediate effect.Note 45 Breakdown of equities by sector and regionDenmarkRest ofEurope North America Totalper cent per cent per cent per centEnergy 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Materials 1.2 0.0 0.0 1.2Industrials 7.1 0.0 0.0 7.1Consumer durables 1.2 0.0 0.0 1.2Consumer goods 4.4 0.0 0.0 4.4Health care 10.2 0.3 0.0 10.5Finance 5.6 0.7 0.0 6.3IT 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0Telecommunications 1.5 0.0 0.0 1.5Utilities 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Not broken down 1 68.9 (27.7) 25.5 66.8101.1 (26.7) 25.5 100.01'Not broken down' for the rest of Europe includes options exposure of a negative DKK 13,618mThe ATP Group – Annual Report 2012130
Management's Review Business Model Risk Pension Hedging and Investment Hedging Investment Administration Social Responsibility The ATP Group Financial StatementsNote 46 Correlation between sub-portfolio and accounting statement for ATPDKK billionHedgingportfolioInvestmentportfolioFundingaccountInvestmentstatementTotalAccountingstatementTotalDifferenceCash balance 246.2 (26.3) (218.3) 1.6 3.4 1.8Real estate 0.0 8.2 0.0 8.2 8.2 1 0.0Financial derivatives 15.6 (37.6) 0.0 (22.0) 85.2 107.2Equity investments 0.0 29.1 0.0 29.1 29.1 0.0Subsidiaries 0.0 66.8 0.0 66.8 66.8 2 0.0Bonds 305.2 240.0 0.0 545.2 539.7 (5.5)Loans to portfolio companies 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.0Other 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 58.2 4 58.2Total 567.0 280.7 5 (218.3) 6 629.4 791.1 7 161.71) Cf. the items 'Investment properties' and 'Owner-occupied properties' in ATP's balance sheet, page 73.2) Cf. the items 'Investments in subsidiaries' and 'Investments in associates' in ATP's balance sheet, page 73.3) Accounting items not included in the investment statement.4) Cf. the items 'Intangible assets', 'Operating equipment', 'Contributions receivable', 'Interest receivable and accrued rent', 'Other receivables', 'Deferredtax on pension-savings returns', 'Receivables from subsidiaries', 'Receivables from credit institutions' and 'Other prepayments' in ATP's balancesheet, page 73.5) Cf. the market value of 'Total investment portfolio', page 73.6) Cf. the market value at end-2012, specified under the item 'Transferred to hedging activities', page 46.7) Cf. the item 'Total assets' in ATP’s balance sheet, page 73.8) Each figure is reconciled separately and, accordingly, rounding differences may occur.ATP's portfolio is divided into two sub-portfolios – the hedging portfolioand the investment portfolio. As a result of this division and becauseof differences in the definition of assets for portfolio and accountingpurposes, the investment portfolio cannot be recogniseddirectly in ATP's financial statements. Correlations between the portfolios,including their market values, and the assets in the financialstatements are set out in the table above.The table shows the various accounting assets, calculated for purposesof investment and accounting, respectively. The difference betweenthe two statements appears from the outer right-hand column.The DKK 1.8bn difference in 'Cash balance' is attributable to unsettledtrades. In the investment statement, liquidity is affected by purchaseand sale already on the trade date, while liquidity is not affected untilthe value date in the accounting statement.The DKK 107.2bn difference in 'Financial derivatives' is attributableto four factors. Firstly, the investment statement includes the net valueof positive as well as negative market values. In the accountingstatement, positive and negative market values are divided into assetsand liabilities, respectively. Thus negative market values, totallingDKK 46.8bn, are included in the accounting statement of financialderivatives, but under liabilities. Secondly, the value of repo transactionsis classified differently. The investment statement includes bothpositive and negative market values related to repo transactions underfinancial instruments. In the accounting statement, repo transactionsare included as liabilities under 'Payables to credit institutions'at a negative market value of DKK 106.2bn, while repo transactionsare included as assets under 'Receivables from credit institutions' ata positive market value of DKK 46.3bn. Denne forskel udgør netto 59,9mia. kr. For det tredje klassificeres markedsværdien af valutaterminskontrakterindgået med datterselskaber forskelligt. The investmentstatement includes the DKK 0,7bn market value under 'Financial derivatives'.In the accounting statement, these contracts are included under'Payables to subsidiaries' (liability). Finally, open futures contractsare included in the investment statement at a market value of 0, whilethe accounting statement includes these contracts at a market valueequivalent to the sum of all margin settlements paid/received underopen futures contracts. This difference is a negative DKK 0.2bn. Betweenthem, these factors explain the DKK 107.2bn difference.The difference in 'Bonds', totalling DKK 5.5bn, is attributable mainlyto the fact that interest receivable is included in the market values ofThe ATP Group – Annual Report 2012131
Page 1 and 2:
The ATP GroupAnnual Report 2012
Page 3 and 4:
Management's Review Business Model
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8:
Management's Review B u s i n e s s
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
M a n a g e m e n t 's R ev i ew B
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
M a n a g e m e n t 's R ev i ew B
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Management's Review B u s in e s s
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
M an a g e m e nt's Revi ew B u s i
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
M an a g e m e nt's Revi ew B u s i
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80: Management's Review Business Model
Page 129: Management's Review Business Model
Page 139: Hovedtræk ATP Koncernens hovedtal
show all

The ATP Group Annual Report 2012

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?