115Buchanan-Smith HM 1991. A field study on the red-bellied tamarin, Saguinus l. labiatus, inBoliva. International Journal of <strong>Prima</strong>tology 12, 259-276Tamarins spent 90% of their time in the upper half of their 186 cm-high cages when observationswere made from a hide.Clarence WM, Scott JP, Dorris MC, Paré M 2006. Use of enclosures providing verticaldimension by captive rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) involved in biomedical research.JAALAS [Contemporary Topics in Laboratory Animal Science], 45(5), 31-34"The monkeys visited more often a<strong>nd</strong> occupied <strong>for</strong> longer time regions at or above human eyelevel [perches a<strong>nd</strong> top home cage] than lower regions." The total percentage of time spent in thetop home cage was fou<strong>nd</strong> to be significantly greater than in the bottom home cage."European Commission 2002. The Welfare of Non-human <strong>Prima</strong>tes - <strong>Re</strong>port of the ScientificCommitte on Animal Health a<strong>nd</strong> Animal Welfare. European Commission, Strasbourg, Francehttp://europa.eu.int/comm/food/fs/sc/scah/out83_en.pdf"<strong>En</strong>closures <strong>for</strong> nonhuman prim<strong>ates</strong> should be equipped with one or more elevated restingsurfaces (to a position higher than the level at which they perceive threatening factors, e.g.,humans) a<strong>nd</strong> installed in such a way that an animal can sit on them com<strong>for</strong>tably. Perches orshelves should be provided in all cages. Arboreal species should be given adequate verticalspace to allow the expression of normal locomotory behaviour. <strong>Prima</strong>tes should not be placed i<strong>nd</strong>ouble-tiered caging unless the arrange<strong>ment</strong> permits adequate vertical move<strong>ment</strong> <strong>for</strong> theanimal."Goff C, Howell SM, Fritz J, Nankivell B 1994. Space use a<strong>nd</strong> proximity of captive chimpanzees(Pan troglodytes) mother/offspring pairs. Zoo Biology 13, 61-68"<strong>Re</strong>sults confirmed the importance of vertical cage dimension a<strong>nd</strong> suggested the provision ofhorizontal substr<strong>ates</strong> above the enclosure floor is important."Home Office 1989. Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986. Code of Practice <strong>for</strong> the Housinga<strong>nd</strong> Care of Animals Used in Scientific Procedures. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, Lo<strong>nd</strong>on, UKhttp://sciencea<strong>nd</strong>research.homeoffice.gov.uk/animal-research/legislation/"The use of space by prim<strong>ates</strong> means that cage volume is important. Virtually all show a verticalflight reaction. Cage height should allow <strong>for</strong> this a<strong>nd</strong> should permit the animals to sta<strong>nd</strong> erect,jump a<strong>nd</strong> climb, a<strong>nd</strong> to sit on a perch without head or tail touching the cage."International <strong>Prima</strong>tological Society 1993. IPS International guidelines <strong>for</strong> the acquisition, carea<strong>nd</strong> breeding of nonhuman prim<strong>ates</strong>, Codes of Practice 1-3. <strong>Prima</strong>te <strong>Re</strong>port 35, 3-29http://pin.primate.wisc.edu/ips/codes.txt"The vertical dimension of the cage is of importance [because of the vertical flight response] a<strong>nd</strong>cages where the monkey is able to perch above human eye level are recomme<strong>nd</strong>ed."Kaumanns W, Schönmann U 1997. <strong>Re</strong>quire<strong>ment</strong>s <strong>for</strong> cebids. <strong>Prima</strong>te <strong>Re</strong>port 49, 71-91"Arboreal species need ... enclosures which allow a differentiated moving in the verticaldimension. They should be able to use spatial positions which are above the level ... ofthreatening humans or potential dangerous events in their environ<strong>ment</strong>. Cage positions in akeeping room below the eye level of human can be a source of permanent stress, because theyare incompatible with adaptive te<strong>nd</strong>encies of arboreal prim<strong>ates</strong> to avoid risks by using higherparts of the habitat."
116MacLean E, Roberts Prior S 2006. View from the top. AWI (Animal Welfare Institute) Quarterly55(3), 7http://www.awionline.org/quarterly/view_from_top.html"Across both co<strong>nd</strong>itions, monkeys showed a strong preference <strong>for</strong> the upper-row cage i<strong>nd</strong>icatingthat elevation was more important than illumination in guiding location preference. Althoughmonkeys did increase the amount of time that they spent in the lower row during periods ofreversed lighting, this tre<strong>nd</strong> was not significant. Nonetheless, we do not interpret this result asevidence that sufficient lighting is not important to captive monkeys. Rather, we believe thatmonkeys' consistent preference <strong>for</strong> the upper-row reflects the paramount importance of access toelevated space."National <strong>Re</strong>search Council 1998. The Psychological Well-Being of Nonhuman <strong>Prima</strong>tesNational Academy Press, Washington, DChttp://fermat.nap.edu/books/0309052335/html/i<strong>nd</strong>ex.html"U<strong>nd</strong>er natural co<strong>nd</strong>itions, many prim<strong>ates</strong> spe<strong>nd</strong> much of their lives abovegrou<strong>nd</strong> a<strong>nd</strong> escapeupward to avoid terrestrial threats. There<strong>for</strong>e, these animals might perceive the presence ofhumans above them as particularly threatening. ... Even macaques, which some describe assemiterrestrial, spe<strong>nd</strong> most of the day in elevated locations a<strong>nd</strong> seek the refuge of trees at night.... Optimal use of available cage space might well depe<strong>nd</strong> more on the place<strong>ment</strong> of perches,plat<strong>for</strong>ms, moving a<strong>nd</strong> stationary supports, a<strong>nd</strong> refuges than on cage size itself."<strong>Re</strong>inhardt V, Liss C, Stevens C 1996. Space require<strong>ment</strong> stipulations <strong>for</strong> caged nonhumanprim<strong>ates</strong> in the United St<strong>ates</strong>: A critical review. Animal Welfare 5, 361-372http://www.awionline.org/Lab_animals/biblio/aw4space.htm"Having no stimulatory value, space alone does not enhance an animal's environ<strong>ment</strong>. ... Legalspace require<strong>ment</strong>s <strong>for</strong> non-human prim<strong>ates</strong> are not adequate unless they stipulate that sufficientheight be provided to accommodate properly placed elevated structures."Ross SR, Lukasb KE 2006. Use of space in a non-naturalistic environ<strong>ment</strong> by chimpanzees (Pantroglodytes) a<strong>nd</strong> lowla<strong>nd</strong> gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) . Applied Animal Behaviour Science96, 143-152"Chimpanzees preferred the highest tier of the enclosure a<strong>nd</strong> the gorillas preferred the floorlevel. Both species showed preferences <strong>for</strong> doorways, corners a<strong>nd</strong> the mesh barriers adjacent tokeeper areas."Taylor L, Owens A 2004. <strong>En</strong>closure use by aged squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus). AmericanJournal of <strong>Prima</strong>tology 62(Supple<strong>ment</strong>), 85 (Abstract)http://www.asp.org/asp2004/abstractDisplay.cfm?abstractID=800&confEventID=808A group of squirrel monkeys was translocated from an i<strong>nd</strong>oor exhibit to an outdoor enclosure."The monkeys were scored most often among the largest a<strong>nd</strong> highest branches in the tallest treein the enclosure (17.7% ). .. None were ever scored on the grou<strong>nd</strong>, despite the water sourcebeing there a<strong>nd</strong> the insect <strong>for</strong>aging opportunities.”Westlu<strong>nd</strong> K Preference of the vertical dimension of cyno pairs living in high cages. LaboratoryAnimal <strong>Re</strong><strong>finem</strong>ent a<strong>nd</strong> <strong>En</strong>rich<strong>ment</strong> Forum (electronic discussion group), November 28, 2002"In a quantitative study I did on pair-housed cynos the animals spent 95% of their waking time inthe upper part of the cage (being housed in a system that resembles a double-tier system, butwith vertical access to upper a<strong>nd</strong> lower sections) - which suggests that their preference along thegradient of height is unequivocal! No bedding was provided on any of the cage floors, a<strong>nd</strong> all
- Page 3:
Table of ContentsSpecies-typical Be
- Page 7 and 8:
2Behavioral Pathologies (Abnormal B
- Page 9 and 10:
Meyerson BJ 1986. Ethology in anima
- Page 11 and 12:
6"An animal treated unsympathetical
- Page 13 and 14:
8"If sufficient room is not provide
- Page 15 and 16:
Canadian Council on Animal Care 198
- Page 17 and 18:
12Platt DM, Kinsey JH, Jorgenson MJ
- Page 19 and 20:
14(7) Enforced RestraintAdams MR, K
- Page 21 and 22:
16Goosen DJ, Davies JH, Maree M, Do
- Page 23 and 24:
Norman RL, McGlone J, Smith CJ 1994
- Page 25 and 26:
20Crockett CM, Bowers CL, Shimoji M
- Page 27 and 28:
22(10) Double-tier Cage Arrangement
- Page 29 and 30:
National Research Council 1998. The
- Page 31 and 32:
26Coe CL 1991. Is social housing of
- Page 33 and 34:
28Tatoyan SK, Cherkovich GM 1972. T
- Page 35 and 36:
30Line SW, Morgan KN, Markowitz H,
- Page 37 and 38:
32Reinhardt V 1989. Evaluation of t
- Page 39 and 40:
34Clarke AS, Juno CJ, Maple TL 1982
- Page 41 and 42:
36The animals “spent most time in
- Page 43 and 44:
38Brent L, Belik M 1997. The respon
- Page 45 and 46:
40"Access to the puzzles was accomp
- Page 47 and 48:
42"The purpose of this study was to
- Page 49 and 50:
44Choi GC 1993. Humans enrich the l
- Page 51 and 52:
46“Eleven baboons who had been si
- Page 53 and 54:
48Reinhardt V, Houser WD, Eisele S,
- Page 55 and 56:
50Thompson MA, Bloomsmith MA, Taylo
- Page 57 and 58:
(7) Working with Cooperative Animal
- Page 59 and 60:
54Lambeth SP, Hau J, Perlman JE, Ma
- Page 61 and 62:
56Smith M, Barley J, Down N, Franci
- Page 63 and 64:
Environmental Enrichment58(1) Defin
- Page 65 and 66:
60Baker KC, Seres M, Aureli F, de W
- Page 67 and 68:
62Judge PG, de Waal BM, Paul KS, Go
- Page 69 and 70: (2,1,b) Group-housing: Group Format
- Page 71 and 72: 66McNary JK 1992. Integration of ch
- Page 73 and 74: 68Clarke MR, Blanchard JL 1994. All
- Page 75 and 76: Watts E 1997. Introductions. In Ora
- Page 77 and 78: 72Baumans V, Coke C, Green J, Morea
- Page 79 and 80: 74Hotchkiss CE, Paule MG 2003. Effe
- Page 81 and 82: 76Reinhardt V, Hurwitz S 1993. Eval
- Page 83 and 84: 78Shively CA 2001. Psychological we
- Page 85 and 86: 80“The establishment of dominance
- Page 87 and 88: 82Reinhardt V 1991. Agonistic behav
- Page 89 and 90: Abney D, Conlee K, Cunneen M, Down
- Page 91 and 92: 86Boccia ML, Broussard C, Scanlan J
- Page 93 and 94: Southey ER, Baldwin CM 2006. Social
- Page 95 and 96: T-W-Fiennes RN 1972. Primates - Gen
- Page 97 and 98: 927 to 44 training sessions. .. The
- Page 99 and 100: 94Baumans V, Coke C, Green J, Morea
- Page 101 and 102: 96Skoumbourdis EK 2008. Pole-and-co
- Page 103 and 104: 98Tamarins (Saguinus spp.)Smith TE,
- Page 105 and 106: 100Bertrand F, Seguin Y, Chauvier F
- Page 107 and 108: 102Gilloux I, Gurnell J, Shepherdso
- Page 109 and 110: 104Molzen EM, French JA 1989. The p
- Page 111 and 112: 106Reinhardt V 1992. Foraging for c
- Page 113 and 114: 108Boccia ML 1989. Long-term effect
- Page 115 and 116: 110Baumans V, Coke C, Green J, More
- Page 117 and 118: 112”We give our pair-housed cynos
- Page 119: 114use their hands to obtain and pr
- Page 123 and 124: Bayne K, Hurst JK, Dexter SL 1992.
- Page 125 and 126: 120Phillippi-Falkenstein K 1998. Us
- Page 127 and 128: 122Shimoji M, Bowers CL, Crockett C
- Page 129 and 130: Anonymous 1991. The psychological w
- Page 131 and 132: 126Pruetz JD, Bloomsmith MA 1992. C
- Page 133 and 134: 128Reinhardt V 1990. Time budget of
- Page 135 and 136: 130O'Neill PL, Wright AC, Weed JL 1
- Page 137 and 138: 132above ground level. I very often
- Page 139 and 140: 134Canadian Council on Animal Care
- Page 141 and 142: 136International Primatological Soc
- Page 143 and 144: 138forage daily, by scattering food
- Page 145 and 146: 140sensory and emotional experience
- Page 147 and 148: 142Bayne K 1989 Resolving issues of
- Page 149 and 150: 144creation? Very unlikely!I think
- Page 151: 146Spaeth GL 1994. Editorial: Carin