Re finem for Annot ment a Prima tated nd En ates K Biblio vironm ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

123Watson SL, Gray A, Taylor E, Johnson B, Fahm B, McGee A, Bingham W, Banks P 2002.Efficacy of environmental enrichment for garnett's bushbaby (Otolemur garnettii). AmericanJournal of Primatology 57, 38-39“Bushbabies interacted with swinging/climbing apparati significantly more than withmanipulanda.... All animals spent significantly more time at the top than at the bottom of theircages (t(17)=3.3, p=.004). ... These results suggest that provision of vertical space andswinging/climbing opportunities may be more effective forms of enrichment for bushbabies thanprovision of manipulanda.“Williams LE, Abee CR, Barnes SR, Ricker RB 1988. Cage design and configuration for anarboreal species of primate. Laboratory Animal Science 38, 289-291Squirrel monkeys preferred a PVC pipe perch (rigid) over rope perches (non-rigid). For anarboreal animal, a higher perch may be perceived as safer." Perches decreased the propensityfor tail ulcers associated with floor contact. "With only one perch level, males were forced tospend a large percentage of their time sitting on the floor rather than the main perches [whichwere occupied by females]."Wolff A 1989. Polyvinyl chloride piping as perch material for squirrel monkeys. LaboratoryPrimate Newsletter 28(1), 7http://www.brown.edu/Research/Primate/lpn28-1.html#pvc"An additional unexpected benefit of the PVC piping has been a decrease in dorsal tail-headabrasions, frequently seen in squirrel monkeys that sit on the stainless steel flooring of standardprimate cages."Woodbeck T, Reinhardt V 1991. Perch use by Macaca mulatta in relation to cage location.Laboratory Primate Newsletter 30(4), 11-12http://www.brown.edu/Research/Primate/lpn30-4.html#perchSingle-housed "animals living in lower-row cages spent an average of 31.6% of the timeperching on their pipes while animals living in upper-row cages perched only 6.9% of the time.Access to the vertical dimension of the cage was more important for the lower-row cagedmonkeys who continuously live close to the ground, in the horizontal dimension of the room."(6) Promoting Object-oriented Behavior(6,1) Commercial Toysphoto by Peggy O’Neill-Wagner
Anonymous 1991. The psychological well-being of primates. Primate News 25(Fall), 3-5"The problems with all these devices is that they are expensive to purchase (foraging boards cost$60 each) and to maintain (they require many hours to fill and clean). ... We could live with theexpense if we were certain that these devices really improve the well-being of the animals. Itseems, however, that after a short time the animals lose interest in foraging boards, and fleeceboards, just as they lose interest in balls and toys."Bayne K 1989. Nylon balls re-visited. Laboratory Primate Newsletter 28(1), 5-6http://www.brown.edu/Research/Primate/lpn28-1.html#ball"Approximately 10% of the [single-housed] monkeys in a room utilize the ball at any giventime."Bayne K, Hurst JK, Dexter SL 1992. Evaluation of the preference to and behavioral effects of anenriched environment on male rhesus monkeys. Laboratory Animal Science 42, 38-45"With simultaneous exposure, the single-housed subjects spent the greatest portion of theinteractive time [30 minute-observation sessions] on the perch [16.8%], the second greatestamount of time spent divided approximately equally between interacting with the Kong [5.0%]and Tug-A-Toy [4.9%], and the least amount of time spent manipulating the grooming board[0.4%]."Bayne K, Dexter SL, Hurst JK, Strange GM, Hill EE 1993. Kong toys for laboratory primates:Are they really an enrichment or just fomites? Laboratory Animal Science 43, 78-85"The use of simple toys for environmental enrichment of laboratory primates is an economicalmeans of increasing the complexity of the cage environment to a limited degree. The limitationspresented by this method of enrichment include the finite ways in which a simple device can elicitnormative behaviors and the relatively rapid habituation to the device." It was demonstrated thatmicrobial growth can persist on enrichment devices - such as Kong toys - after they have beensanitized in a commercial cagewasher.Bloomsmith MA, Finlay TW, Merhalski JJ, Maple TL 1990. Rigid plastic balls as enrichmentdevices for captive chimpanzees. Laboratory Animal Science 40(3), 319-322"The mean percentage of ball-use time for all subjects during the study [first ten hours afterinitial presentation] was 7.1%. ... Age and housing effects were obtained, with younger animalsand those housed in more barren environments exhibiting higher levels of ball use. It isconcluded that the balls were worthwhile additions to the chimpanzee environments with usestabilizing at a mean of 2.5% of the subjects' time."Brent L, Stone AM 1998. Destructible toys as enrichment for captive chimpanzees. Journal ofApplied Animal Welfare Science 1, 5-14Nine singly caged chimpanzees were provided with eight different toys made of plastic, vinyl, orcloth one at a time or several at once. The toys remained in the cages an average of three days."The chimpanzees varied greatly in their interest in the toys. One subject rarely contacted thetoys and others used them a great deal and quickly destroyed them."Cardinal BR, Kent SJ 1998. Behavioral effects of simple manipulable environmental enrichmenton pair-housed juvenile macaques (Macaca nemestrina). Laboratory Primate Newsletter 37(1),1-3http://www.brown.edu/Research/Primate/lpn37-1.html#kent“Toy use declined with time, indicating that rotation of toys ... may increase use."124
Page 3:
Table of ContentsSpecies-typical Be
Page 7 and 8:
2Behavioral Pathologies (Abnormal B
Page 9 and 10:
Meyerson BJ 1986. Ethology in anima
Page 11 and 12:
6"An animal treated unsympathetical
Page 13 and 14:
8"If sufficient room is not provide
Page 15 and 16:
Canadian Council on Animal Care 198
Page 17 and 18:
12Platt DM, Kinsey JH, Jorgenson MJ
Page 19 and 20:
14(7) Enforced RestraintAdams MR, K
Page 21 and 22:
16Goosen DJ, Davies JH, Maree M, Do
Page 23 and 24:
Norman RL, McGlone J, Smith CJ 1994
Page 25 and 26:
20Crockett CM, Bowers CL, Shimoji M
Page 27 and 28:
22(10) Double-tier Cage Arrangement
Page 29 and 30:
National Research Council 1998. The
Page 31 and 32:
26Coe CL 1991. Is social housing of
Page 33 and 34:
28Tatoyan SK, Cherkovich GM 1972. T
Page 35 and 36:
30Line SW, Morgan KN, Markowitz H,
Page 37 and 38:
32Reinhardt V 1989. Evaluation of t
Page 39 and 40:
34Clarke AS, Juno CJ, Maple TL 1982
Page 41 and 42:
36The animals “spent most time in
Page 43 and 44:
38Brent L, Belik M 1997. The respon
Page 45 and 46:
40"Access to the puzzles was accomp
Page 47 and 48:
42"The purpose of this study was to
Page 49 and 50:
44Choi GC 1993. Humans enrich the l
Page 51 and 52:
46“Eleven baboons who had been si
Page 53 and 54:
48Reinhardt V, Houser WD, Eisele S,
Page 55 and 56:
50Thompson MA, Bloomsmith MA, Taylo
Page 57 and 58:
(7) Working with Cooperative Animal
Page 59 and 60:
54Lambeth SP, Hau J, Perlman JE, Ma
Page 61 and 62:
56Smith M, Barley J, Down N, Franci
Page 63 and 64:
Environmental Enrichment58(1) Defin
Page 65 and 66:
60Baker KC, Seres M, Aureli F, de W
Page 67 and 68:
62Judge PG, de Waal BM, Paul KS, Go
Page 69 and 70:
(2,1,b) Group-housing: Group Format
Page 71 and 72:
66McNary JK 1992. Integration of ch
Page 73 and 74:
68Clarke MR, Blanchard JL 1994. All
Page 75 and 76:
Watts E 1997. Introductions. In Ora
Page 77 and 78: 72Baumans V, Coke C, Green J, Morea
Page 79 and 80: 74Hotchkiss CE, Paule MG 2003. Effe
Page 81 and 82: 76Reinhardt V, Hurwitz S 1993. Eval
Page 83 and 84: 78Shively CA 2001. Psychological we
Page 85 and 86: 80“The establishment of dominance
Page 87 and 88: 82Reinhardt V 1991. Agonistic behav
Page 89 and 90: Abney D, Conlee K, Cunneen M, Down
Page 91 and 92: 86Boccia ML, Broussard C, Scanlan J
Page 93 and 94: Southey ER, Baldwin CM 2006. Social
Page 95 and 96: T-W-Fiennes RN 1972. Primates - Gen
Page 97 and 98: 927 to 44 training sessions. .. The
Page 99 and 100: 94Baumans V, Coke C, Green J, Morea
Page 101 and 102: 96Skoumbourdis EK 2008. Pole-and-co
Page 103 and 104: 98Tamarins (Saguinus spp.)Smith TE,
Page 105 and 106: 100Bertrand F, Seguin Y, Chauvier F
Page 107 and 108: 102Gilloux I, Gurnell J, Shepherdso
Page 109 and 110: 104Molzen EM, French JA 1989. The p
Page 111 and 112: 106Reinhardt V 1992. Foraging for c
Page 113 and 114: 108Boccia ML 1989. Long-term effect
Page 115 and 116: 110Baumans V, Coke C, Green J, More
Page 117 and 118: 112”We give our pair-housed cynos
Page 119 and 120: 114use their hands to obtain and pr
Page 121 and 122: 116MacLean E, Roberts Prior S 2006.
Page 123 and 124: Bayne K, Hurst JK, Dexter SL 1992.
Page 125 and 126: 120Phillippi-Falkenstein K 1998. Us
Page 127: 122Shimoji M, Bowers CL, Crockett C
Page 131 and 132: 126Pruetz JD, Bloomsmith MA 1992. C
Page 133 and 134: 128Reinhardt V 1990. Time budget of
Page 135 and 136: 130O'Neill PL, Wright AC, Weed JL 1
Page 137 and 138: 132above ground level. I very often
Page 139 and 140: 134Canadian Council on Animal Care
Page 141 and 142: 136International Primatological Soc
Page 143 and 144: 138forage daily, by scattering food
Page 145 and 146: 140sensory and emotional experience
Page 147 and 148: 142Bayne K 1989 Resolving issues of
Page 149 and 150: 144creation? Very unlikely!I think
Page 151: 146Spaeth GL 1994. Editorial: Carin
show all

Re finem for Annot ment a Prima tated nd En ates K Biblio vironm ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?