69“Future group members [same sex, 6 females a<strong>nd</strong> 6 males] were given ample opportunity tophysically interact with each other on a one-to-one basis a<strong>nd</strong> were considered ready <strong>for</strong> group<strong>for</strong>mation only when they had demonstrated compatibility a<strong>nd</strong> clear-cut dominancesubordinationrelationships.” Persistent aggressive interactions made it imperative to disba<strong>nd</strong>both groups shortly after group <strong>for</strong>mation.Rhine RJ, Cox RL 1989 How not to enlarge a stable group of stumptailed macaques (Macacaarctoides). In Housing, Care a<strong>nd</strong> Psychological Well-being of Captive a<strong>nd</strong> Laboratory <strong>Prima</strong>tesSegal EF (ed), 255-269. Noyes Publications, Park Ridge, NJ"The best advice, based on our experience ... is to combine groups, or introduce adult animals,only as a very last resort, a<strong>nd</strong> then with great care a<strong>nd</strong> assiduous monitoring."Schapiro SJ, Lee-Parritz DE, Taylor LL, Watson L, Bloomsmith MA, Petto AJ 1994. Behavioralmanage<strong>ment</strong> of specific pathogen-free rhesus macaques: Group <strong>for</strong>mation, reproduction, a<strong>nd</strong>parental competence. Laboratory Animal Science 44, 229-234Initial group <strong>for</strong>mation was amicable. “During the first breeding season, there were outbreaksof severe aggression, leading to the permanent removal of three [of seven] males a<strong>nd</strong> 17 [of 50]females."Stahl D, Herrmann F, Kaumanns W 2001. Group <strong>for</strong>mation of a captive all-male group of liontailedmacaques (Macaca silenus). <strong>Prima</strong>te <strong>Re</strong>port 59, 93-108http://www.dpz.gwdg.de/pr/pr59/stahl.pdf6 adults were brought together simultaneously. They “showed no fights or other seriousaggression during the first encounter on the first day. Aggression r<strong>ates</strong> were high only duringthe first hour after introduction .... Afterwards, the aggression level remained within a similarlow level ... The develop<strong>ment</strong> of the social relationships within the first days suggests that thereis a certain degree of social compatibility between male lion-tailed macaques.. .. After four days,the zoo decided to remove Heiner from the group. The animal did not show conspiciousaggressive behaviour but it was thought that he was not compatible. .... Four weeks after thegroup establish<strong>ment</strong> Nepomuk died because of a chronic, subacute gastritis. Two months later,another monkey, Smokie, died because of a bacterial infection. To prevent further risks the groupwas disba<strong>nd</strong>ed at the e<strong>nd</strong> of December 1995.“Westergaard GC, Izard MK, Drake JD, Suomi SJ, Higley JD 1999. Rhesus macaque (Macacamulatta) group <strong>for</strong>mation a<strong>nd</strong> housing: Wou<strong>nd</strong>ing a<strong>nd</strong> reproduction in a specific pathogen free(SPF) colony. American Journal of <strong>Prima</strong>tology 49, 339-347Initially small groups were <strong>for</strong>med consisting of one male a<strong>nd</strong> up to eight females. Subsequentlylarger groups [about 3 males a<strong>nd</strong> 21 females] were <strong>for</strong>med by releasing group memberssimultaneously or incre<strong>ment</strong>ally" When <strong>for</strong>ming rhesus macaque breeding groups from partialgroups a<strong>nd</strong> strangers, a staged group <strong>for</strong>mation method leads to lower traumatic wou<strong>nd</strong>ing r<strong>ates</strong>than does a rapid <strong>for</strong>mation method in which all i<strong>nd</strong>ividuals are put together at once. When<strong>for</strong>ming new rhesus macaque breeding groups, divided corrals that provide <strong>for</strong> social a<strong>nd</strong> visualseparation of i<strong>nd</strong>ividuals lead to lower r<strong>ates</strong> of traumatic wou<strong>nd</strong>ing than do u<strong>nd</strong>ivided corrals."Orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus)Hamburger L 1988. Introduction of two young orangutans, Pongo pygmaeus, into an establishedfamily group. International Zoo Yearbook 27, 273-278Successful re-introduction of two ha<strong>nd</strong> reared young orangutans into a family group isdescribed.
Watts E 1997. Introductions. In Orangutan Species Survival Plan Husba<strong>nd</strong>ry Manual Sodaro C(ed), 69-84. Atlanta Orangutan SSP (Species Survival Plan), Atlanta, GAGroup integration a<strong>nd</strong> re-introduction techniques are described a<strong>nd</strong> valuable recomme<strong>nd</strong>ationsmade.Squirrel monkeys (Saimiri spp.)King JE, Norwood VR 1989. Free-environ<strong>ment</strong> rooms as alternative housing <strong>for</strong> squirrelmonkeys. In Housing, Care a<strong>nd</strong> Psychological Well-being of Captive a<strong>nd</strong> Laboratory <strong>Prima</strong>tesSegal EF (ed), 102-114. Noyes Publications, Park Ridge"I<strong>nd</strong>ividual a<strong>nd</strong> gang cages were removed from two conventional colony rooms a<strong>nd</strong> the monkeys[11 females a<strong>nd</strong> 5 males] were simply released into the rooms. Immediately following theestablish<strong>ment</strong> of these two free-environ<strong>ment</strong> rooms, a few monkeys incurred sprains a<strong>nd</strong> brokenteeth, probably resulting from falls. ... Two deaths resulted from attacks by other monkeys.”Me<strong>nd</strong>oza SP 1991. Sociophysiology of well-being in nonhuman prim<strong>ates</strong>. Laboratory AnimalScience 41, 344-349The <strong>for</strong>mation of same-sex groups “is rarely accompanied by injurious aggression. Onceunisexual groups have stabilized, <strong>for</strong>mation of larger heterosexual groups generally proceedssmoothly.”Vermeer J 1997. The <strong>for</strong>mation of a captive squirrel monkey group. International Zoo News 44,146-149http://www.awionline.org/Lab_animals/biblio/izn-ver.htm"It is important that all females of a new [heterosexual] group are related to each other, that is,that they come from the same natal group. The introduction of unfamiliar females to a smallgroup with several females can result in much aggression with severe injury.” The minimumnumber of breeding females in a group should be five to seven. A maximum of two adult malesshould be added to these females. Groups of up to ten males can be <strong>for</strong>med without manyproblems.Williams LE, Abee CR 1988. Aggression with mixed age-sex groups of Bolivian squirrelmonkeys following single animal introductions a<strong>nd</strong> new group <strong>for</strong>mations. Zoo Biology 7, 139-145"When introducing new animals to an established group, the new animals should be unfamiliarwith one another so as not to <strong>for</strong>m competing 'teams'. Additions to groups should include enoughanimals so that aggression from the resident group will be diffused, not concentrated on one ortwo animals." New groups should be followed <strong>for</strong> a number of hours, even after an initial declinein agonistic interactions.Vervet monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops)Else JG 1985. Captive propagation of vervet monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops) in harems.Laboratory Animal Science 35, 373-375Animals were placed in ten single-male harem groups. This "resulted in considerable fightingamong the females. Each group was gradually reduced over a one year period to 2-4 femaleswith their young. Three adult females died during the [three year] study. All had been u<strong>nd</strong>erfairly continual harass<strong>ment</strong>."70
- Page 3:
Table of ContentsSpecies-typical Be
- Page 7 and 8:
2Behavioral Pathologies (Abnormal B
- Page 9 and 10:
Meyerson BJ 1986. Ethology in anima
- Page 11 and 12:
6"An animal treated unsympathetical
- Page 13 and 14:
8"If sufficient room is not provide
- Page 15 and 16:
Canadian Council on Animal Care 198
- Page 17 and 18:
12Platt DM, Kinsey JH, Jorgenson MJ
- Page 19 and 20:
14(7) Enforced RestraintAdams MR, K
- Page 21 and 22:
16Goosen DJ, Davies JH, Maree M, Do
- Page 23 and 24: Norman RL, McGlone J, Smith CJ 1994
- Page 25 and 26: 20Crockett CM, Bowers CL, Shimoji M
- Page 27 and 28: 22(10) Double-tier Cage Arrangement
- Page 29 and 30: National Research Council 1998. The
- Page 31 and 32: 26Coe CL 1991. Is social housing of
- Page 33 and 34: 28Tatoyan SK, Cherkovich GM 1972. T
- Page 35 and 36: 30Line SW, Morgan KN, Markowitz H,
- Page 37 and 38: 32Reinhardt V 1989. Evaluation of t
- Page 39 and 40: 34Clarke AS, Juno CJ, Maple TL 1982
- Page 41 and 42: 36The animals “spent most time in
- Page 43 and 44: 38Brent L, Belik M 1997. The respon
- Page 45 and 46: 40"Access to the puzzles was accomp
- Page 47 and 48: 42"The purpose of this study was to
- Page 49 and 50: 44Choi GC 1993. Humans enrich the l
- Page 51 and 52: 46“Eleven baboons who had been si
- Page 53 and 54: 48Reinhardt V, Houser WD, Eisele S,
- Page 55 and 56: 50Thompson MA, Bloomsmith MA, Taylo
- Page 57 and 58: (7) Working with Cooperative Animal
- Page 59 and 60: 54Lambeth SP, Hau J, Perlman JE, Ma
- Page 61 and 62: 56Smith M, Barley J, Down N, Franci
- Page 63 and 64: Environmental Enrichment58(1) Defin
- Page 65 and 66: 60Baker KC, Seres M, Aureli F, de W
- Page 67 and 68: 62Judge PG, de Waal BM, Paul KS, Go
- Page 69 and 70: (2,1,b) Group-housing: Group Format
- Page 71 and 72: 66McNary JK 1992. Integration of ch
- Page 73: 68Clarke MR, Blanchard JL 1994. All
- Page 77 and 78: 72Baumans V, Coke C, Green J, Morea
- Page 79 and 80: 74Hotchkiss CE, Paule MG 2003. Effe
- Page 81 and 82: 76Reinhardt V, Hurwitz S 1993. Eval
- Page 83 and 84: 78Shively CA 2001. Psychological we
- Page 85 and 86: 80“The establishment of dominance
- Page 87 and 88: 82Reinhardt V 1991. Agonistic behav
- Page 89 and 90: Abney D, Conlee K, Cunneen M, Down
- Page 91 and 92: 86Boccia ML, Broussard C, Scanlan J
- Page 93 and 94: Southey ER, Baldwin CM 2006. Social
- Page 95 and 96: T-W-Fiennes RN 1972. Primates - Gen
- Page 97 and 98: 927 to 44 training sessions. .. The
- Page 99 and 100: 94Baumans V, Coke C, Green J, Morea
- Page 101 and 102: 96Skoumbourdis EK 2008. Pole-and-co
- Page 103 and 104: 98Tamarins (Saguinus spp.)Smith TE,
- Page 105 and 106: 100Bertrand F, Seguin Y, Chauvier F
- Page 107 and 108: 102Gilloux I, Gurnell J, Shepherdso
- Page 109 and 110: 104Molzen EM, French JA 1989. The p
- Page 111 and 112: 106Reinhardt V 1992. Foraging for c
- Page 113 and 114: 108Boccia ML 1989. Long-term effect
- Page 115 and 116: 110Baumans V, Coke C, Green J, More
- Page 117 and 118: 112”We give our pair-housed cynos
- Page 119 and 120: 114use their hands to obtain and pr
- Page 121 and 122: 116MacLean E, Roberts Prior S 2006.
- Page 123 and 124: Bayne K, Hurst JK, Dexter SL 1992.
- Page 125 and 126:
120Phillippi-Falkenstein K 1998. Us
- Page 127 and 128:
122Shimoji M, Bowers CL, Crockett C
- Page 129 and 130:
Anonymous 1991. The psychological w
- Page 131 and 132:
126Pruetz JD, Bloomsmith MA 1992. C
- Page 133 and 134:
128Reinhardt V 1990. Time budget of
- Page 135 and 136:
130O'Neill PL, Wright AC, Weed JL 1
- Page 137 and 138:
132above ground level. I very often
- Page 139 and 140:
134Canadian Council on Animal Care
- Page 141 and 142:
136International Primatological Soc
- Page 143 and 144:
138forage daily, by scattering food
- Page 145 and 146:
140sensory and emotional experience
- Page 147 and 148:
142Bayne K 1989 Resolving issues of
- Page 149 and 150:
144creation? Very unlikely!I think
- Page 151:
146Spaeth GL 1994. Editorial: Carin