Re finem for Annot ment a Prima tated nd En ates K Biblio vironm ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

47guy, himself was on his second pair attempt. During his first attempt — all he did was try tostart a fight. To our great relief the new pair worked out just fine. This truly ”odd couple“ gotalong great from the start. Grandpa responded correctly, brought the little guy in line, andactually perked up. The most surprising part, however, was that Grandpa stopped hair pulling.He stopped completely, and all his hair had grown back in the course of several months.Three years later Grandpa had not resumed his old habit, even though his buddy hadbeen removed for research-related reasons one year after the original pair formation.”Missakian EA 1972. Effects of adult social experience on patterns of reproductive activity ofsocially deprived male rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Journal of Personality and SocialPsychology 21(1), 131-134Two of three males showed a decrease in both stereotyped locomotion and self-aggression afterbeing introduced into a group of rhesus macaques.National Research Council 1998. The Psychological Well-Being of Nonhuman PrimatesNational Academy Press, Washington, DChttp://fermat.nap.edu/books/0309052335/html/index.html"Social interactions are considered to be one of the most important factors influencing thepsychological well-being of most nonhuman primates. ... The common practice of housing rhesusmonkeys singly calls for special attention.”Reimers M, Schwarzenberger F, Preuschoft S 2007. Rehabilitation of research chimpanzees:Stress and coping after long-term isolation. Hormones and Behavior, in print“Permanent retirement from biomedical research in combination with therapeuticresocialization maximizing chimpanzees' situation control resulted in reduced fecal cortisolmetabolite levels. Our results indicate that chimpanzees can recover from severe socialdeprivation, and may experience resocialization as less stressful than solitary housing."Roberts SJ, Platt ML 2004. Pair-housing macaques with biomedical implants: a safe andpractical alternative to single-housing. American Journal of Primatology 62(Supplement), 96-97http://www.asp.org/asp2004/abstractDisplay.cfm?abstractID=734&confEventID=828”Recognition of the importance of social interaction for primate well-being has led to newUSDA guidelines recommending that animal facilities provide social enrichment for captiveprimates, as long as doing so does not endanger the animals or interfere with research goals.Group- or pair-housing is the best way to provide social enrichment, but many primates used inmedical research are housed singly because they have implants which may make them morevulnerable to inflicted injury. In addition, pairing adult male monkeys is often considered toodifficult and too impractical to attempt. The goal of this study was to evaluate these assumptions.Eight adult male rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) and two adult male crab-eating macaques(Macaca fascicularis) were evaluated for pairing and then housed with a compatible partner forup to three years. During the period of study, 9 of the 10 monkeys received cranial and scleralsearch coil implants. On average, each monkey was compatible with 69% of partners, and thishigh degree of compatibility allowed monkeys to be paired continuously within three weeks ofinitial evaluation. Moreover, the rate of implant failure during pair-housing (0.07 failures permonth) was not significantly different from the rate of implant failure when monkeys were singlyhoused(0.098). These data demonstrate that pair-housing provides a safe and practical socialalternative to single-housing for adult male macaques with biomedical implants.“
48Reinhardt V, Houser WD, Eisele S, Champoux M 1987. Social enrichment with infants of theenvironment for singly caged adult rhesus monkeys. Zoo Biology 6, 365-371http://www.awionline.org/Lab_animals/biblio/zb6-365.htm"Three adults exhibiting stereotypical behavior abandoned their peculiar habits after they hadlived with their young companions for four months."Reinhardt V, Houser W, Eisele S, Cowley D, Vertein R 1988. Behavior responses of unrelatedrhesus monkey females paired for the purpose of environmental enrichment. American Journalof Primatology 14, 135-140http://www.brown.edu/Research/Primate/lpn26-2.html#vik6 of 7 animals abandoned behavioral disorders within the first 4 ws of living together with acompanion.Reinhardt V, Houser WD, Cowley D, Eisele S, Vertein R 1989. Alternatives to single caging ofrhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta ) used in research. Zeitschrift für Versuchstierkunde 32, 275-279http://www.awionline.org/Lab_animals/biblio/es32-2~1.htm“Pairing caged rhesus monkeys with compatible conspecifics does not interfere with a number ofcommon research protocols [e.g., headcap implantation, experimental surgery, bloodcollection].”Reinhardt V 1990. Social enrichment for laboratory primates: A critical review. LaboratoryPrimate Newsletter 29(3), 7-11http://www.brown.edu/Research/Primate/lpn29-3.html#rev"23% (54/237) of individually caged, but only 10% (38/382) of pair-housed rhesus monkeysrequired medical treatment."Reinhardt V 1999. Pair-housing overcomes self-biting behavior in macaques. Laboratory PrimateNewsletter 38(1), 4http://www.brown.edu/Research/Primate/lpn38-1.html#pairSubjects exhibited self-biting behavior predictably in the presence of personnel. ”The transfer toa compatible social-housing arrangement [isosexual pair-housing] effectively cured the [seven]rhesus subjects from the behavioral pathology of habitual self-biting.“Rukstalis M, French JA 2005. Vocal buffering of the stress response: exposure to conspecific.Hormones and Behavior 47, 1-7“For many species, the presence of a significant social partner can lessen the behavioral andphysiological responses to stressful stimuli. This study examined whether a single, individuallyspecific, signature vocalization (phee call) could attenuate the physiological stress response thatis induced in marmosets by housing them in short-term social isolation. .. Isolated marmosetsexposed to a familiar pair mate's vocalization showed significantly lower levels of urinarycortisol than when exposed to unfamiliar marmoset vocalizations (P
Page 3: Table of ContentsSpecies-typical Be
Page 7 and 8: 2Behavioral Pathologies (Abnormal B
Page 9 and 10: Meyerson BJ 1986. Ethology in anima
Page 11 and 12: 6"An animal treated unsympathetical
Page 13 and 14: 8"If sufficient room is not provide
Page 15 and 16: Canadian Council on Animal Care 198
Page 17 and 18: 12Platt DM, Kinsey JH, Jorgenson MJ
Page 19 and 20: 14(7) Enforced RestraintAdams MR, K
Page 21 and 22: 16Goosen DJ, Davies JH, Maree M, Do
Page 23 and 24: Norman RL, McGlone J, Smith CJ 1994
Page 25 and 26: 20Crockett CM, Bowers CL, Shimoji M
Page 27 and 28: 22(10) Double-tier Cage Arrangement
Page 29 and 30: National Research Council 1998. The
Page 31 and 32: 26Coe CL 1991. Is social housing of
Page 33 and 34: 28Tatoyan SK, Cherkovich GM 1972. T
Page 35 and 36: 30Line SW, Morgan KN, Markowitz H,
Page 37 and 38: 32Reinhardt V 1989. Evaluation of t
Page 39 and 40: 34Clarke AS, Juno CJ, Maple TL 1982
Page 41 and 42: 36The animals “spent most time in
Page 43 and 44: 38Brent L, Belik M 1997. The respon
Page 45 and 46: 40"Access to the puzzles was accomp
Page 47 and 48: 42"The purpose of this study was to
Page 49 and 50: 44Choi GC 1993. Humans enrich the l
Page 51: 46“Eleven baboons who had been si
Page 55 and 56: 50Thompson MA, Bloomsmith MA, Taylo
Page 57 and 58: (7) Working with Cooperative Animal
Page 59 and 60: 54Lambeth SP, Hau J, Perlman JE, Ma
Page 61 and 62: 56Smith M, Barley J, Down N, Franci
Page 63 and 64: Environmental Enrichment58(1) Defin
Page 65 and 66: 60Baker KC, Seres M, Aureli F, de W
Page 67 and 68: 62Judge PG, de Waal BM, Paul KS, Go
Page 69 and 70: (2,1,b) Group-housing: Group Format
Page 71 and 72: 66McNary JK 1992. Integration of ch
Page 73 and 74: 68Clarke MR, Blanchard JL 1994. All
Page 75 and 76: Watts E 1997. Introductions. In Ora
Page 77 and 78: 72Baumans V, Coke C, Green J, Morea
Page 79 and 80: 74Hotchkiss CE, Paule MG 2003. Effe
Page 81 and 82: 76Reinhardt V, Hurwitz S 1993. Eval
Page 83 and 84: 78Shively CA 2001. Psychological we
Page 85 and 86: 80“The establishment of dominance
Page 87 and 88: 82Reinhardt V 1991. Agonistic behav
Page 89 and 90: Abney D, Conlee K, Cunneen M, Down
Page 91 and 92: 86Boccia ML, Broussard C, Scanlan J
Page 93 and 94: Southey ER, Baldwin CM 2006. Social
Page 95 and 96: T-W-Fiennes RN 1972. Primates - Gen
Page 97 and 98: 927 to 44 training sessions. .. The
Page 99 and 100: 94Baumans V, Coke C, Green J, Morea
Page 101 and 102: 96Skoumbourdis EK 2008. Pole-and-co
Page 103 and 104:
98Tamarins (Saguinus spp.)Smith TE,
Page 105 and 106:
100Bertrand F, Seguin Y, Chauvier F
Page 107 and 108:
102Gilloux I, Gurnell J, Shepherdso
Page 109 and 110:
104Molzen EM, French JA 1989. The p
Page 111 and 112:
106Reinhardt V 1992. Foraging for c
Page 113 and 114:
108Boccia ML 1989. Long-term effect
Page 115 and 116:
110Baumans V, Coke C, Green J, More
Page 117 and 118:
112”We give our pair-housed cynos
Page 119 and 120:
114use their hands to obtain and pr
Page 121 and 122:
116MacLean E, Roberts Prior S 2006.
Page 123 and 124:
Bayne K, Hurst JK, Dexter SL 1992.
Page 125 and 126:
120Phillippi-Falkenstein K 1998. Us
Page 127 and 128:
122Shimoji M, Bowers CL, Crockett C
Page 129 and 130:
Anonymous 1991. The psychological w
Page 131 and 132:
126Pruetz JD, Bloomsmith MA 1992. C
Page 133 and 134:
128Reinhardt V 1990. Time budget of
Page 135 and 136:
130O'Neill PL, Wright AC, Weed JL 1
Page 137 and 138:
132above ground level. I very often
Page 139 and 140:
134Canadian Council on Animal Care
Page 141 and 142:
136International Primatological Soc
Page 143 and 144:
138forage daily, by scattering food
Page 145 and 146:
140sensory and emotional experience
Page 147 and 148:
142Bayne K 1989 Resolving issues of
Page 149 and 150:
144creation? Very unlikely!I think
Page 151:
146Spaeth GL 1994. Editorial: Carin
show all

Re finem for Annot ment a Prima tated nd En ates K Biblio vironm ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?