27Line SW, Morgan KN, Markowitz H, Strong S 1989. Heart rate a<strong>nd</strong> activity of rhesus monkeysin response to routine events. Laboratory <strong>Prima</strong>te Newsletter 28(2), 9-12http://www.brown.edu/<strong>Re</strong>search/<strong>Prima</strong>te/lpn28-2.html#line“Variations in heart rate a<strong>nd</strong> activity are closely associated with human activity in the room."Line SW 1995. Effects of observation technique on the behavior of adult rhesus macaques.Contemporary Topics in Laboratory Animal Science 34, 61-65"During videotaped sessions, move<strong>ment</strong> was higher in frequency a<strong>nd</strong> duration, while aggressivebehavior was lower" a<strong>nd</strong> stereotyped locomotion higher in frequency than during direct liveobservations.Malinow MR, Hill JD, Ochsner AJ 1974. Heart rate in caged rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).Laboratory Animal Science 24, 537-540“The rapid increase of 80 beats/min recorded when someone entered the room a<strong>nd</strong> tapped thecages is most probably related to the action of the autonomic nervous system a<strong>nd</strong> may explainthe high heart r<strong>ates</strong> reported in most studies of restrained or anesthetized monkeys. Thus, whenthe results of cardiovascular studies in rhesus monkeys are interpreted, the variables introducedby the sympathetic or parasympathetic nerves should be considered."Manuck SB, Kaplan JR, Clarkson TB 1983. Behavioral i<strong>nd</strong>uced heart rate reactivity a<strong>nd</strong>atherosclerosis in cynomolgus monkeys. Psychosomatic Medicine 45, 95-108The presence of the experi<strong>ment</strong>er [without glove!] dramatically increased heart rate in about50% of animals studied.<strong>Re</strong>inhardt V 1997. <strong>Re</strong>fining the traditional housing a<strong>nd</strong> ha<strong>nd</strong>ling of laboratory rhesus macaquesimproves scientific methodology. <strong>Prima</strong>te <strong>Re</strong>port 49, 93-112http://www.awionline.org/Lab_animals/biblio/pr-refi.htm“The macho-type person is out of place in the animal room because s/he triggers stress or eve<strong>nd</strong>istress reactions. Typically, the animal will freak out a<strong>nd</strong> hide in a back corner of the cagewhen such a person comes into their room."<strong>Re</strong>inhardt V 1999. Pair-housing overcomes self-biting behavior in macaques. Laboratory <strong>Prima</strong>teNewsletter 38(1), 4http://www.brown.edu/<strong>Re</strong>search/<strong>Prima</strong>te/lpn38-1.html#pairSeven single-caged subjects exhibited self-biting behavior predictably in the presence ofpersonnel.Schnell CR, Wood JM 1993. Measure<strong>ment</strong> of blood pressure, heart rate, body temperature, ECGa<strong>nd</strong> activity by telemetry in conscious unrestrained marmosets. Proceedings of the 5th Federationof European Laboratory Animal Science Association Symposium, 107-111"After event A [presence of a person], we observed a twofold increase in activity a<strong>nd</strong> a markedincrease in CT [temperature], MAP [blood pressure] a<strong>nd</strong> HR [heart rate]."Schnell CR, Wood JM 1993. Measure<strong>ment</strong> of blood pressure a<strong>nd</strong> heart rate by telemetry inconscious, unrestrained marmosets. American Journal of Physiology 264, H1509-1516During the weeke<strong>nd</strong>, daytime values of heart rate a<strong>nd</strong> blood pressure were significantly lower,a<strong>nd</strong> motor activity was higher. "The higher motor activity suggests greater social interactionswhen the marmosets are u<strong>nd</strong>isturbed. The lower MAP [blood pressure] a<strong>nd</strong> HR [heart rate]suggest that the animals may be less anxious a<strong>nd</strong> feel better in this situation."
28Tatoyan SK, Cherkovich GM 1972. The heart rate in monkeys (Baboons a<strong>nd</strong> Macaques) i<strong>nd</strong>ifferent physiological st<strong>ates</strong> recorded by radiotelemetry. Folia <strong>Prima</strong>tologica 17, 255-266"In the presence of man the heart rate is always increased, in spite of the fact that the monkeysappear to be calm."Tinklepaugh OL 1928. The self-mutilation of a male Macacus rhesus monkey. Journal ofMammalogy 9, 293-300A drastic case of observer-i<strong>nd</strong>uced self-biting of a male rhesus macaques is described.(13) NoiseBaldwin AL, Schwartz GE, Hopp DH 2007. Are investigators aware of environ<strong>ment</strong>al noise inanimal facilities a<strong>nd</strong> that this noise may affect experi<strong>ment</strong>al data? Journal of the AmericanAssociation <strong>for</strong> Laboratory Animal Science [Contemporary Topics in Laboratory AnimalScience] 46(1), 45-51”Because faculty are the least aware of noise as a potential problem but are primarilyresponsible <strong>for</strong> designing experi<strong>ment</strong>s, research involving animals may be confou<strong>nd</strong>ed by noiseas an unknown variable. This effect may lead to unnecessary numbers of animals being requiredto achieve statistical significance a<strong>nd</strong> possibly to erroneous interpretation of results. On thebasis of the fi<strong>nd</strong>ings of this survey, we present recomme<strong>nd</strong>ations <strong>for</strong> improving the environ<strong>ment</strong>,particularly <strong>for</strong> decreasing the noise level, in animal facilities.”Patterson-Kane EG, Farnworth MJ 2006. Noise exposure, music, a<strong>nd</strong> animals in the laboratory:A com<strong>ment</strong>ary based on Laboratory Animal <strong>Re</strong><strong>finem</strong>ent a<strong>nd</strong> <strong>En</strong>rich<strong>ment</strong> Forum (LAREF)discussions. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 9, 327-332"Evidence supports the use of quiet music during nonhuman animals' activity periods, if thispractice is introduced with an awareness of the risks to welfare a<strong>nd</strong> research."Pines MK, Kaplan G, Rogers LJ 2004. Stressors of common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) inthe captive environ<strong>ment</strong>: Effects on behaviour a<strong>nd</strong> cortisol levels. Folia <strong>Prima</strong>tologica75(Supple<strong>ment</strong>), 317-318 (Abstract)Salivary cortisol samples, collected using a cotton bud with banana on the tip, doubled following30 minutes of exposure to playing radio (70-80 dB) or loud construction work (70-80 dB).Despite being sheltered from rain while outdoors, the marmosets moved i<strong>nd</strong>oors voluntarilywhen it was raining. ”There was no change in cortisol levels following the non-traumatic deathof a cage/room mate, however, cortisol levels doubled (a<strong>nd</strong> remained elevated <strong>for</strong> at least fivedays) following the accidental injury a<strong>nd</strong> death of a cage/room mate in the absence of any otherdisturbing event. Involve<strong>ment</strong> of room-m<strong>ates</strong> in non-invasive experi<strong>ment</strong>s was also stressful, withcortisol levels doubling. Activity levels a<strong>nd</strong> time spent on the floor of the cage decreases, butthere was no change in other stress-i<strong>nd</strong>icative behaviours. It would seem that the marmosetsmight be using a passive coping technique to deal with stressors over which they have nocontrol. The results suggest that marmosets are negatively affected by noise a<strong>nd</strong> any ki<strong>nd</strong> ofevent adversely affecting a room-mate.“
- Page 3: Table of ContentsSpecies-typical Be
- Page 7 and 8: 2Behavioral Pathologies (Abnormal B
- Page 9 and 10: Meyerson BJ 1986. Ethology in anima
- Page 11 and 12: 6"An animal treated unsympathetical
- Page 13 and 14: 8"If sufficient room is not provide
- Page 15 and 16: Canadian Council on Animal Care 198
- Page 17 and 18: 12Platt DM, Kinsey JH, Jorgenson MJ
- Page 19 and 20: 14(7) Enforced RestraintAdams MR, K
- Page 21 and 22: 16Goosen DJ, Davies JH, Maree M, Do
- Page 23 and 24: Norman RL, McGlone J, Smith CJ 1994
- Page 25 and 26: 20Crockett CM, Bowers CL, Shimoji M
- Page 27 and 28: 22(10) Double-tier Cage Arrangement
- Page 29 and 30: National Research Council 1998. The
- Page 31: 26Coe CL 1991. Is social housing of
- Page 35 and 36: 30Line SW, Morgan KN, Markowitz H,
- Page 37 and 38: 32Reinhardt V 1989. Evaluation of t
- Page 39 and 40: 34Clarke AS, Juno CJ, Maple TL 1982
- Page 41 and 42: 36The animals “spent most time in
- Page 43 and 44: 38Brent L, Belik M 1997. The respon
- Page 45 and 46: 40"Access to the puzzles was accomp
- Page 47 and 48: 42"The purpose of this study was to
- Page 49 and 50: 44Choi GC 1993. Humans enrich the l
- Page 51 and 52: 46“Eleven baboons who had been si
- Page 53 and 54: 48Reinhardt V, Houser WD, Eisele S,
- Page 55 and 56: 50Thompson MA, Bloomsmith MA, Taylo
- Page 57 and 58: (7) Working with Cooperative Animal
- Page 59 and 60: 54Lambeth SP, Hau J, Perlman JE, Ma
- Page 61 and 62: 56Smith M, Barley J, Down N, Franci
- Page 63 and 64: Environmental Enrichment58(1) Defin
- Page 65 and 66: 60Baker KC, Seres M, Aureli F, de W
- Page 67 and 68: 62Judge PG, de Waal BM, Paul KS, Go
- Page 69 and 70: (2,1,b) Group-housing: Group Format
- Page 71 and 72: 66McNary JK 1992. Integration of ch
- Page 73 and 74: 68Clarke MR, Blanchard JL 1994. All
- Page 75 and 76: Watts E 1997. Introductions. In Ora
- Page 77 and 78: 72Baumans V, Coke C, Green J, Morea
- Page 79 and 80: 74Hotchkiss CE, Paule MG 2003. Effe
- Page 81 and 82: 76Reinhardt V, Hurwitz S 1993. Eval
- Page 83 and 84:
78Shively CA 2001. Psychological we
- Page 85 and 86:
80“The establishment of dominance
- Page 87 and 88:
82Reinhardt V 1991. Agonistic behav
- Page 89 and 90:
Abney D, Conlee K, Cunneen M, Down
- Page 91 and 92:
86Boccia ML, Broussard C, Scanlan J
- Page 93 and 94:
Southey ER, Baldwin CM 2006. Social
- Page 95 and 96:
T-W-Fiennes RN 1972. Primates - Gen
- Page 97 and 98:
927 to 44 training sessions. .. The
- Page 99 and 100:
94Baumans V, Coke C, Green J, Morea
- Page 101 and 102:
96Skoumbourdis EK 2008. Pole-and-co
- Page 103 and 104:
98Tamarins (Saguinus spp.)Smith TE,
- Page 105 and 106:
100Bertrand F, Seguin Y, Chauvier F
- Page 107 and 108:
102Gilloux I, Gurnell J, Shepherdso
- Page 109 and 110:
104Molzen EM, French JA 1989. The p
- Page 111 and 112:
106Reinhardt V 1992. Foraging for c
- Page 113 and 114:
108Boccia ML 1989. Long-term effect
- Page 115 and 116:
110Baumans V, Coke C, Green J, More
- Page 117 and 118:
112”We give our pair-housed cynos
- Page 119 and 120:
114use their hands to obtain and pr
- Page 121 and 122:
116MacLean E, Roberts Prior S 2006.
- Page 123 and 124:
Bayne K, Hurst JK, Dexter SL 1992.
- Page 125 and 126:
120Phillippi-Falkenstein K 1998. Us
- Page 127 and 128:
122Shimoji M, Bowers CL, Crockett C
- Page 129 and 130:
Anonymous 1991. The psychological w
- Page 131 and 132:
126Pruetz JD, Bloomsmith MA 1992. C
- Page 133 and 134:
128Reinhardt V 1990. Time budget of
- Page 135 and 136:
130O'Neill PL, Wright AC, Weed JL 1
- Page 137 and 138:
132above ground level. I very often
- Page 139 and 140:
134Canadian Council on Animal Care
- Page 141 and 142:
136International Primatological Soc
- Page 143 and 144:
138forage daily, by scattering food
- Page 145 and 146:
140sensory and emotional experience
- Page 147 and 148:
142Bayne K 1989 Resolving issues of
- Page 149 and 150:
144creation? Very unlikely!I think
- Page 151:
146Spaeth GL 1994. Editorial: Carin