Competing in the Single Market - SMEs and ... - Erhvervsstyrelsen

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Eurochambres and Slovenian Bureau and Research Association (SBRA) (2002), Corporate Readinessfor Enlargement in Central Europe. A Company Survey on the State of Preparations for the SingleMarket 2002, Eurochambres, Brussels.European Commission, DG Enterprise, Innovation Directorate (2001a), Innovation Policy in SixCandidate Countries: the Challenges. Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Poland and Slovenia.Final Report.European Commission, DG Enterprise (2001b), Innovation Policy in Europe 2001 – European TrendChart on Innovation, Innovation Papers No 17.European Commission, DG Enterprise (2001c), Innovation Policy Profile: Estonia.European Commission, DG Enterprise (2001d), Innovation Policy Profile: Poland.European Commission, DG Enterprise (2002a), 2002 European Innovation Scoreboard: TechnicalPaper No 1 – Member States and Associate Countries.European Commission, DG Enterprise (2002b), 2002 European Innovation Scoreboard: TechnicalPaper No 2 – Candidate Countries.European Commission, DG Enterprise (2002c), Innovation Policy in Europe 2002 – European TrendChart on Innovation, Innovation Papers No 29.European Commission, DG Enterprise (2002d), SMEs in Focus. Main Results from the 2002Observatory of European SMEs.European Commission, DG Enterprise (2002e), SMEs in Europe, Including a First Glance at EUCandidate Countries, Observatory of European SMEs 2002, No.2.European Commission, DG Enterprise (2002f), Innovation Tomorrow. Innovation Policy andthe Regulatory Framework: Making Innovation an Integral Part of the Broader Structural Agenda.Innovation papers No.28.European Commission (2002g), DG Enterprise, High-tech SMEs in Europe, Observatory ofEuropean SMEs 2002, No.6.http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/enterprise_policy/analysis/doc/smes_observatory_2002_report6_en.pdfEuropean Commission, DG Enterprise, Innovation Directorate (2003a), Future Directions ofInnovation Policy in Europe, Innovation Papers No 31.European Commission, DG Enterprise, Innovation Directorate (2003b), Innovation Policy in SevenCandidate Countries: The Challenges. Bulgaria, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Romania, Slovakia andTurkey. Final Report, Volume 1, Innovation Papers No 34.European Commission, DG Enterprise, Innovation Directorate (2003c), Innovation Capabilities inSeven Candidate Countries: An Assessment, March 2003, Brussels.ftp://ftp.cordis.lu/pub/innovation-policy/studies/slavo_final_report_march_2003.pdfEuropean Commission, DG Enterprise (2003d), Innovation Policy Profile: Latvia.European Commission, DG Enterprise (2003e), Innovation Policy Profile: Lithuania.100
European Commission (2003f), Comprehensive Monitoring Report on Estonia’s Preparations forMembership.European Commission (2003g), Comprehensive Monitoring Report on Latvia’s Preparations forMembership.European Commission (2003h), Comprehensive Monitoring Report on Lithuania’s Preparations forMembership.European Commission (2003i), Comprehensive Monitoring Report on Poland’s Preparations forMembership.European Commission (2003j), Commission Staff Working Paper Report on the Implementation ofthe European Charter for Small Enterprises in the Candidate Countries for Accession to the EuropeanUnion, SEC (2003) 57, Brussels. http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/enlargement/charter/report_2003/implementation_en.pdfEuropean Commission (2003k), Communication from the Commission to the Council, theEuropean Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of theRegions, Innovation Policy: Updating the Union’s Approach in the Context of the Lisbon Strategy,COM(2003) 112, Brussels.European Commission (2003l), Commission Staff Working Paper, 2003 European InnovationScoreboard, SEC(2003) 1255, Brussels. http://trendchart.cordis.lu/Reports/Documents/SEC_2003_1255_1_EN_DOCUMENTDETRAVAIL.pdfEuropean Commission, DG Enterprise (2003m), European Trend Chart on Innovation– Estonia Country Report (covering period September 2002-August 2003), Brussels. http://trendchart.cordis.lu/Reports/Documents/Estonia_CR_September_2003.pdfEuropean Commission, DG Enterprise (2003n), European Trend Chart on Innovation– Latvia Country Report (covering period September 2002-August 2003), Brussels. http://trendchart.cordis.lu/Reports/Documents/Latvia_CR_September_2003.pdfEuropean Commission, DG Enterprise (2003o), European Trend Chart on Innovation– Lithuania Country Report (covering period September 2002-August 2003), Brussels. http://trendchart.cordis.lu/Reports/Documents/Lithuania_CR_September_2003.pdfEuropean Commission, DG Enterprise (2003p), European Trend Chart on Innovation– Poland Country Report (covering period September 2002-August 2003), Brussels. http://trendchart.cordis.lu/Reports/Documents/Poland_CR_September_2003.pdfEuropean Commission (2003q), Communication from the Commission to the Council and theEuropean Parliament, Thinking Small in an Enlarging Europe, COM(2003) 26, Brussels.European Commission (2003r), Commission Staff Working Paper, Creating an EntrepreneurialEurope – The Activities of the European Union for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs),SEC(2003) 58, Brussels.101
Page 1 and 2:
Sylvia Schwaag SergerEmily HanssonC
Page 4 and 5:
About the International Organisatio
Page 7:
PREFACEAccession to the Single Mark
Page 10 and 11:
enterprise development. There are n
Page 12 and 13:
BOXESBox 1: The ‘Knowledge-Based
Page 15 and 16:
INTRODUCTIONAfter more than 10 year
Page 17 and 18:
CHAPTER 1: FROM STABILISATION TO IN
Page 19:
increased competitive pressure as B
Page 22 and 23:
Box 2: On Innovation and Innovation
Page 24 and 25:
Table 5: GDP Growth 1995-2003 in Se
Page 26 and 27:
Table 7: Relative Strengths and Wea
Page 28 and 29:
Box 3: The Indicator ProblemExistin
Page 31 and 32:
CHAPTER 2:BALTIC SMEs - AGENTS OF F
Page 33 and 34:
Table 9: Average Annual Growth of S
Page 35 and 36:
Box 4: Overview of Selected Multina
Page 37 and 38:
The Role of SMEs in Transitional Ec
Page 39 and 40:
e to the potential advantage of the
Page 41 and 42:
A common measurement of business ac
Page 43 and 44:
Figure 8: Labour Productivity per P
Page 45 and 46:
Figure 10: Employment in Med/Hi-tec
Page 47 and 48:
Summing up, there are fewer economi
Page 49 and 50:
Overall, SMEs tend to lack the fina
Page 51 and 52: Figure 12: Enterprises with Innovat
Page 53 and 54: Figure 14: Proportion of Enterprise
Page 55 and 56: Table 14: Barriers to Innovation fo
Page 57 and 58: Some interesting examples of cluste
Page 59 and 60: CHAPTER 3:POLICIES PROMOTING SMEs A
Page 61 and 62: National governments themselves wil
Page 63 and 64: Institutional StructureIn all of th
Page 65 and 66: EU countries (innovation relay cent
Page 67 and 68: LITHUANIAAgency/OrganisationLithuan
Page 69 and 70: From the private sector, the chambe
Page 71 and 72: On the whole, the B4 have relativel
Page 73 and 74: LITHUANIAProgramme/Policy DocumentI
Page 75 and 76: Table 19: B4 National Rankings of A
Page 77 and 78: Box 11: Structural Funds to the Can
Page 79 and 80: Box 12: On SMEs and FinancingIt doe
Page 81 and 82: examples of evaluations of national
Page 83 and 84: CHAPTER 4:CHALLENGES AND RECOMMENDA
Page 85 and 86: General challengesBased on our own
Page 87 and 88: the above-mentioned channels. 27 On
Page 89 and 90: the EU average and particularly wit
Page 91 and 92: RecommendationsBased on the challen
Page 93 and 94: CHAPTER 5:A VISION OF A NORDIC-BALT
Page 95 and 96: addition, they are the most advance
Page 97 and 98: countries. One such sign is the rap
Page 99 and 100: CONCLUSIONSEU accession will not re
Page 101: REFERENCESAlfonso, Antonio, Ludger
Page 105 and 106: Eurostat (2004a), SMEs in the Candi
Page 107 and 108: Statistical Office of Estonia (2004
Page 109 and 110: APPENDIX I:Agenda for Working Group
Page 111 and 112: DAY 2:POLICY SOLUTIONS9:30-10:30 In
Page 113 and 114: APPENDIX II:Participants in the IKE
Page 115 and 116: APPENDIX III:Conclusions from the I
Page 117 and 118: APPENDIX IV:Summary of the Panel se
Page 119 and 120: Regarding the role of policymaking,
Page 121 and 122: APPENDIX V:Description of Field Stu
Page 123 and 124: Mr. Miroslaw MarekMr. Talis Millers
Page 126: IKED - International Organisation f
show all

Competing in the Single Market - SMEs and ... - Erhvervsstyrelsen

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?