There are many areas encompassed with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> realm of SME policies. The International F<strong>in</strong>anceCorporation (IFC) has segmented SME policies/<strong>in</strong>terventions <strong>in</strong>to three areas: bus<strong>in</strong>ess environment,f<strong>in</strong>ancial services, <strong>and</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess development services. Examples of specific policy measures are<strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> Table 15 below.Table 15: <strong>Market</strong>-Oriented SME InterventionsOpen Access to <strong>Market</strong>,Accelerate <strong>Market</strong> DevelopmentInvest <strong>in</strong> Public Goods, BuildInstitutional CapacityReduce <strong>and</strong> RationalizeTraditional Public InterventionsBus<strong>in</strong>essEnvironment• Competition policy• Licens<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> registrationrequirements, adm<strong>in</strong>istrativefees• Commercial transactions law• Intellectual <strong>and</strong> commercialproperty rights• Tax, labour legislation• Infrastructure (transport,ports, market facilities,communications, <strong>in</strong>formationtechnology)• Information (markets,st<strong>and</strong>ards, technologies)• Monitor<strong>in</strong>g of SME performance<strong>and</strong> impact of policies <strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>terventions• Reconsider policies thatreserve certa<strong>in</strong> sectors forsmall-scale enterprises orgrant <strong>the</strong>m special protection• Seek greater neutrality acrossfirm sizes <strong>in</strong> tax <strong>and</strong> labourlegislation <strong>and</strong> enforcementF<strong>in</strong>ancial Services • F<strong>in</strong>ancial sector competitionpolicy• Interest rate ceil<strong>in</strong>gs• Regulations govern<strong>in</strong>g leas<strong>in</strong>g,venture capital, equitymarkets• Innovation <strong>in</strong> loan products,lend<strong>in</strong>g methodologies, deliverymechanisms, risk assessmentmethodologies• Credit bureaus, registries• Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> TA to f<strong>in</strong>ancial<strong>in</strong>stitutions serv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>SMEs</strong>• Reduce direct lend<strong>in</strong>g throughpublic f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>stitutions• Reduce SME lend<strong>in</strong>g(portfolio) requirements onf<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>stitutions• Elim<strong>in</strong>ate subsidized creditl<strong>in</strong>es <strong>and</strong> credit guaranteeschemesBus<strong>in</strong>essDevelopmentServices• Target subsidies for marketdevelopment to specificmarket failures• Information on serviceproviders, impact of services• Enforce competition <strong>in</strong> servicemarkets• Innovation <strong>in</strong> products, deliverymechanisms• Development of performance<strong>and</strong> impact <strong>in</strong>dicators• Increase cost recoveryfor publicly-provided orsubsidized services• Reduce duplication acrossagencies <strong>in</strong> services provided• Use <strong>the</strong> private sector todeliver servicesSource: Hallberg (2000)The EU has outl<strong>in</strong>ed ten areas for support <strong>and</strong> action <strong>in</strong> its Charter for <strong>SMEs</strong> <strong>and</strong> MultiannualProgramme for enterprise <strong>and</strong> entrepreneurship (described <strong>in</strong> chapter 2 of this report). These areas aremeant to address a number of barriers to SME development <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> C<strong>and</strong>idate Countries (as identified<strong>in</strong> a recent survey of <strong>SMEs</strong> <strong>in</strong> Europe, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> C<strong>and</strong>idate Countries):The limited access to f<strong>in</strong>ance seems to be one of <strong>the</strong> serious barriers to economic growth <strong>and</strong>prosperity. One reason is that <strong>the</strong> small enterprises are not considered to be a priority for <strong>the</strong>bank<strong>in</strong>g sector as <strong>the</strong>y are perceived to be high risk. Ano<strong>the</strong>r reason is that small enterprises<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> C<strong>and</strong>idate Countries have yet to develop an entrepreneurial spirit <strong>and</strong> still lack <strong>the</strong>means to know <strong>the</strong>ir needs <strong>and</strong> opportunities, <strong>in</strong> particular <strong>in</strong> terms of management orsupport services. In <strong>the</strong> area of adm<strong>in</strong>istrative simplification progress has been made butfur<strong>the</strong>r efforts are still needed to <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>the</strong> efficiency of <strong>the</strong> public adm<strong>in</strong>istration at all levels.European Commission (2003j, p.18)In <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g section, we take a closer look at <strong>the</strong> breadth of policies affect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>SMEs</strong>, <strong>and</strong> at <strong>the</strong><strong>in</strong>terrelation between SME policy <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>novation policy. We will describe both <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>stitutionalstructure <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> programmes/policies <strong>in</strong> place, as well as comment on progress-to-date <strong>and</strong> priorityareas for <strong>the</strong> future for <strong>the</strong> B4 countries.SME Policies <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> B4Accord<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> European Commission (2002e), after <strong>the</strong> fall of <strong>the</strong> Berl<strong>in</strong> Wall, SME development<strong>in</strong> post-communist countries rapidly became one of <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>cipal economic reform issues. The<strong>in</strong>stitutional structure <strong>and</strong> policy mechanisms support<strong>in</strong>g <strong>SMEs</strong> have developed quite rapidly <strong>in</strong>recent years.60
Institutional StructureIn all of <strong>the</strong> B4 countries, <strong>the</strong>re is widespread awareness of <strong>the</strong> economic significance of <strong>SMEs</strong>, <strong>and</strong>of <strong>the</strong> need to develop specific mechanisms to support <strong>the</strong>ir growth <strong>and</strong> competitiveness. In eachcountry, <strong>the</strong>re are a number of <strong>in</strong>stitutions act<strong>in</strong>g with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> realm of SME <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>novation support,<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>re are a wide range of projects <strong>and</strong> policy mechanisms <strong>in</strong> place. In general, <strong>the</strong> M<strong>in</strong>istry ofEconomy plays <strong>the</strong> lead<strong>in</strong>g role <strong>in</strong> establish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> key programme documents/guidel<strong>in</strong>es for SMEpolicies (see Figure 15). SME policies are generally dealt with <strong>in</strong> parallel to (ra<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>in</strong> connectionwith) <strong>in</strong>novation policies, with a separate division for each area. This division of responsibilities leadsto a tendency to view <strong>SMEs</strong> <strong>in</strong> a vacuum, ra<strong>the</strong>r than as an element of coherent policy for <strong>in</strong>novation<strong>and</strong> enterprise development, <strong>and</strong> makes both coord<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>and</strong> prioritization of policy measuresissue-areas (for a general discussion on <strong>in</strong>novation policy governance see also Box 9).Figure 15: SME <strong>and</strong> Innovation System Governance <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> B4EstoniaEstonian Government<strong>and</strong> ParliamentInnovationSub-CommitteeGovernment R&DCouncilResearchSub-CommitteeM<strong>in</strong>istry of EconomicAffairs <strong>and</strong>CommunicationTechnology <strong>and</strong>Innovation DivisionM<strong>in</strong>istry of Science<strong>and</strong> EducationEnterprise EstoniaEstonian ScienceFoundationScienceCompetenceCouncilSource: European Commission (2003m)LatviaSource: European Commission (2003n)61
- Page 1 and 2:
Sylvia Schwaag SergerEmily HanssonC
- Page 4 and 5:
About the International Organisatio
- Page 7:
PREFACEAccession to the Single Mark
- Page 10 and 11:
enterprise development. There are n
- Page 12 and 13: BOXESBox 1: The ‘Knowledge-Based
- Page 15 and 16: INTRODUCTIONAfter more than 10 year
- Page 17 and 18: CHAPTER 1: FROM STABILISATION TO IN
- Page 19: increased competitive pressure as B
- Page 22 and 23: Box 2: On Innovation and Innovation
- Page 24 and 25: Table 5: GDP Growth 1995-2003 in Se
- Page 26 and 27: Table 7: Relative Strengths and Wea
- Page 28 and 29: Box 3: The Indicator ProblemExistin
- Page 31 and 32: CHAPTER 2:BALTIC SMEs - AGENTS OF F
- Page 33 and 34: Table 9: Average Annual Growth of S
- Page 35 and 36: Box 4: Overview of Selected Multina
- Page 37 and 38: The Role of SMEs in Transitional Ec
- Page 39 and 40: e to the potential advantage of the
- Page 41 and 42: A common measurement of business ac
- Page 43 and 44: Figure 8: Labour Productivity per P
- Page 45 and 46: Figure 10: Employment in Med/Hi-tec
- Page 47 and 48: Summing up, there are fewer economi
- Page 49 and 50: Overall, SMEs tend to lack the fina
- Page 51 and 52: Figure 12: Enterprises with Innovat
- Page 53 and 54: Figure 14: Proportion of Enterprise
- Page 55 and 56: Table 14: Barriers to Innovation fo
- Page 57 and 58: Some interesting examples of cluste
- Page 59 and 60: CHAPTER 3:POLICIES PROMOTING SMEs A
- Page 61: National governments themselves wil
- Page 65 and 66: EU countries (innovation relay cent
- Page 67 and 68: LITHUANIAAgency/OrganisationLithuan
- Page 69 and 70: From the private sector, the chambe
- Page 71 and 72: On the whole, the B4 have relativel
- Page 73 and 74: LITHUANIAProgramme/Policy DocumentI
- Page 75 and 76: Table 19: B4 National Rankings of A
- Page 77 and 78: Box 11: Structural Funds to the Can
- Page 79 and 80: Box 12: On SMEs and FinancingIt doe
- Page 81 and 82: examples of evaluations of national
- Page 83 and 84: CHAPTER 4:CHALLENGES AND RECOMMENDA
- Page 85 and 86: General challengesBased on our own
- Page 87 and 88: the above-mentioned channels. 27 On
- Page 89 and 90: the EU average and particularly wit
- Page 91 and 92: RecommendationsBased on the challen
- Page 93 and 94: CHAPTER 5:A VISION OF A NORDIC-BALT
- Page 95 and 96: addition, they are the most advance
- Page 97 and 98: countries. One such sign is the rap
- Page 99 and 100: CONCLUSIONSEU accession will not re
- Page 101 and 102: REFERENCESAlfonso, Antonio, Ludger
- Page 103 and 104: European Commission (2003f), Compre
- Page 105 and 106: Eurostat (2004a), SMEs in the Candi
- Page 107 and 108: Statistical Office of Estonia (2004
- Page 109 and 110: APPENDIX I:Agenda for Working Group
- Page 111 and 112: DAY 2:POLICY SOLUTIONS9:30-10:30 In
- Page 113 and 114:
APPENDIX II:Participants in the IKE
- Page 115 and 116:
APPENDIX III:Conclusions from the I
- Page 117 and 118:
APPENDIX IV:Summary of the Panel se
- Page 119 and 120:
Regarding the role of policymaking,
- Page 121 and 122:
APPENDIX V:Description of Field Stu
- Page 123 and 124:
Mr. Miroslaw MarekMr. Talis Millers
- Page 126:
IKED - International Organisation f