SummaryIn l<strong>in</strong>e with <strong>the</strong>ir economic development, it can be said that <strong>the</strong> B4 countries have made significantprogress on <strong>in</strong>stitution-build<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> policymak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> support of <strong>SMEs</strong> over <strong>the</strong> last ten years. Eachof <strong>the</strong> B4 countries has both well-developed goals <strong>and</strong> programmes, <strong>and</strong> capable <strong>in</strong>stitutions forimplementation. The ma<strong>in</strong> concern is that <strong>the</strong>se <strong>in</strong>stitutions are often act<strong>in</strong>g on an <strong>in</strong>dependent path,ra<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>in</strong> a coord<strong>in</strong>ated system. SME policies/actions are treated as <strong>in</strong>dependent variables, ra<strong>the</strong>rthan as a part of <strong>the</strong> national <strong>in</strong>novation system.Policy mechanisms have focused primarily on improvements to <strong>the</strong> adm<strong>in</strong>istration, legal <strong>and</strong>regulatory framework, <strong>and</strong> provid<strong>in</strong>g entrepreneurial/management tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> consult<strong>in</strong>g assistanceto <strong>SMEs</strong>. There have been relatively fewer actions <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> areas of f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g (e.g. venture/seed capital,<strong>in</strong>vestments for <strong>in</strong>novation/technology upgrad<strong>in</strong>g) <strong>and</strong> national/<strong>in</strong>ternational network-build<strong>in</strong>g (e.g.public-private research collaboration, cluster<strong>in</strong>g).In addition, over-arch<strong>in</strong>g issues such as <strong>the</strong> organisation <strong>and</strong> evaluation of policymak<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>overall focus of policymak<strong>in</strong>g, need to be addressed. The policy agenda for <strong>SMEs</strong> must be worked<strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> wider context. In <strong>the</strong> next chapter, we address <strong>the</strong> general <strong>and</strong> specific challenges fac<strong>in</strong>g <strong>SMEs</strong><strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> B4, <strong>and</strong> provide recommendations for address<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>se challenges.80
CHAPTER 4:CHALLENGES AND RECOMMENDATIONS“Enterprise policy is a key area that will play a major role <strong>in</strong> sett<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> conditions for this objective(of <strong>the</strong> EU becom<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> most competitive <strong>and</strong> dynamic knowledge-driven economy <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> world) tobe met. In particular, <strong>the</strong> promotion of small <strong>and</strong> medium-sized enterprises (<strong>SMEs</strong>) is thought to befundamental <strong>in</strong> foster<strong>in</strong>g an environment that encourages economic growth <strong>and</strong> job opportunities.”Eurostat (2002b)81IntroductionEnabl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> development of <strong>in</strong>novative <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternationally competitive <strong>SMEs</strong> that are both will<strong>in</strong>g<strong>and</strong> able to grow is a challenge for nearly all countries <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> EU, both exist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> acced<strong>in</strong>g. It isa topical issue <strong>and</strong> policy priority throughout Europe. Given this common challenge, countries canbenefit immensely from a structured exchange of policy experiences <strong>in</strong> this field.At <strong>the</strong> same time, however, <strong>the</strong> conditions for <strong>SMEs</strong> <strong>and</strong> SME development <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> new MemberCountries differ significantly from those of <strong>the</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g Member Countries <strong>in</strong> some important aspects.Compared with countries with a longer tradition of market economy, <strong>SMEs</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> B4 countries tendto be very young, both <strong>in</strong>dividually <strong>and</strong> as a sector. One should po<strong>in</strong>t out here that, as <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> case ofPol<strong>and</strong>, for example, <strong>the</strong>re had already been some reforms prior to 1989 that liberalized small privatebus<strong>in</strong>ess activity <strong>and</strong> foreign trade <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestment, to a certa<strong>in</strong> degree (Balcerowicz et.al. (1998)). Itwould <strong>the</strong>refore be mislead<strong>in</strong>g to assume that private bus<strong>in</strong>ess activity appeared ‘out of nowhere’ <strong>in</strong>1990 <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>se countries. None<strong>the</strong>less, it is fair to say that <strong>SMEs</strong> as a category <strong>and</strong> as a policy targetgroup are a very recent phenomenon <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> B4 countries. This fact has implications for attitudes toentrepreneurship, managerial capabilities, etc.One might generally assume that <strong>the</strong> bulk of SME challenges come from <strong>the</strong>ir small size – lackof critical mass to make longer-term <strong>in</strong>vestments (e.g. R&D), lack of <strong>in</strong>ternational reach, or lackof adequate human resources/skills. In fact, <strong>the</strong> proliferation of ICT <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g trend for<strong>in</strong>ternational network<strong>in</strong>g/cluster<strong>in</strong>g among <strong>SMEs</strong> has opened up new ways for <strong>SMEs</strong> to address oreven overcome <strong>the</strong>se challenges. Instead, <strong>SMEs</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> B4 experience difficulty <strong>in</strong> combatt<strong>in</strong>g attitudestowards commercialisation, secur<strong>in</strong>g adequate sources of f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong> f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> appropriatepartners to lift <strong>the</strong> level of <strong>in</strong>novation <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir companies/sectors. But <strong>the</strong>y are also struggl<strong>in</strong>g with arelatively large burden of meet<strong>in</strong>g regulations (compliance costs) <strong>and</strong> bureaucracy.<strong>SMEs</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> B4, <strong>and</strong> particularly <strong>in</strong> Pol<strong>and</strong>, are smaller than <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g EU Member States.They face greater challenges than <strong>SMEs</strong> that are already <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> S<strong>in</strong>gle <strong>Market</strong> – <strong>the</strong> double challengeof <strong>in</strong>creased competition, <strong>and</strong> hav<strong>in</strong>g to raise st<strong>and</strong>ards, adjust <strong>the</strong>ir processes, production <strong>and</strong>organisation to meet <strong>the</strong> EU regulations.<strong>SMEs</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> B4 tend to be have little experience with formulat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> lobby<strong>in</strong>g for <strong>the</strong>ir needsvis-à-vis government. The local, regional <strong>and</strong> national organisations aimed at provid<strong>in</strong>g support for<strong>SMEs</strong> are also new <strong>and</strong> relatively <strong>in</strong>experienced. In addition, academic <strong>in</strong>stitutions, which potentiallyprovide important access to knowledge <strong>and</strong> to human capital, are not used to <strong>in</strong>teract<strong>in</strong>g with <strong>SMEs</strong>or meet<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> needs of <strong>SMEs</strong>. The <strong>in</strong>terviews conducted <strong>in</strong> connection with this study confirmed
- Page 1 and 2:
Sylvia Schwaag SergerEmily HanssonC
- Page 4 and 5:
About the International Organisatio
- Page 7:
PREFACEAccession to the Single Mark
- Page 10 and 11:
enterprise development. There are n
- Page 12 and 13:
BOXESBox 1: The ‘Knowledge-Based
- Page 15 and 16:
INTRODUCTIONAfter more than 10 year
- Page 17 and 18:
CHAPTER 1: FROM STABILISATION TO IN
- Page 19:
increased competitive pressure as B
- Page 22 and 23:
Box 2: On Innovation and Innovation
- Page 24 and 25:
Table 5: GDP Growth 1995-2003 in Se
- Page 26 and 27:
Table 7: Relative Strengths and Wea
- Page 28 and 29:
Box 3: The Indicator ProblemExistin
- Page 31 and 32: CHAPTER 2:BALTIC SMEs - AGENTS OF F
- Page 33 and 34: Table 9: Average Annual Growth of S
- Page 35 and 36: Box 4: Overview of Selected Multina
- Page 37 and 38: The Role of SMEs in Transitional Ec
- Page 39 and 40: e to the potential advantage of the
- Page 41 and 42: A common measurement of business ac
- Page 43 and 44: Figure 8: Labour Productivity per P
- Page 45 and 46: Figure 10: Employment in Med/Hi-tec
- Page 47 and 48: Summing up, there are fewer economi
- Page 49 and 50: Overall, SMEs tend to lack the fina
- Page 51 and 52: Figure 12: Enterprises with Innovat
- Page 53 and 54: Figure 14: Proportion of Enterprise
- Page 55 and 56: Table 14: Barriers to Innovation fo
- Page 57 and 58: Some interesting examples of cluste
- Page 59 and 60: CHAPTER 3:POLICIES PROMOTING SMEs A
- Page 61 and 62: National governments themselves wil
- Page 63 and 64: Institutional StructureIn all of th
- Page 65 and 66: EU countries (innovation relay cent
- Page 67 and 68: LITHUANIAAgency/OrganisationLithuan
- Page 69 and 70: From the private sector, the chambe
- Page 71 and 72: On the whole, the B4 have relativel
- Page 73 and 74: LITHUANIAProgramme/Policy DocumentI
- Page 75 and 76: Table 19: B4 National Rankings of A
- Page 77 and 78: Box 11: Structural Funds to the Can
- Page 79 and 80: Box 12: On SMEs and FinancingIt doe
- Page 81: examples of evaluations of national
- Page 85 and 86: General challengesBased on our own
- Page 87 and 88: the above-mentioned channels. 27 On
- Page 89 and 90: the EU average and particularly wit
- Page 91 and 92: RecommendationsBased on the challen
- Page 93 and 94: CHAPTER 5:A VISION OF A NORDIC-BALT
- Page 95 and 96: addition, they are the most advance
- Page 97 and 98: countries. One such sign is the rap
- Page 99 and 100: CONCLUSIONSEU accession will not re
- Page 101 and 102: REFERENCESAlfonso, Antonio, Ludger
- Page 103 and 104: European Commission (2003f), Compre
- Page 105 and 106: Eurostat (2004a), SMEs in the Candi
- Page 107 and 108: Statistical Office of Estonia (2004
- Page 109 and 110: APPENDIX I:Agenda for Working Group
- Page 111 and 112: DAY 2:POLICY SOLUTIONS9:30-10:30 In
- Page 113 and 114: APPENDIX II:Participants in the IKE
- Page 115 and 116: APPENDIX III:Conclusions from the I
- Page 117 and 118: APPENDIX IV:Summary of the Panel se
- Page 119 and 120: Regarding the role of policymaking,
- Page 121 and 122: APPENDIX V:Description of Field Stu
- Page 123 and 124: Mr. Miroslaw MarekMr. Talis Millers
- Page 126: IKED - International Organisation f