<strong>and</strong> Estonia have recently evaluated <strong>the</strong>ir national <strong>in</strong>novation policies <strong>and</strong>/or national <strong>in</strong>novationsystems (Georghiou et.al. (2003), Reid (2003)). 29Overall, similar to <strong>the</strong> Nordic countries <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> contrast with a number of o<strong>the</strong>r C<strong>and</strong>idate Countries,<strong>in</strong>novation policy, <strong>and</strong> its importance for competitiveness <strong>and</strong> economic development is not a newconcept <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> B4 (for an overview over <strong>in</strong>novation policies <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> C<strong>and</strong>idate Countries see EuropeanCommission (2001a), (2001c), (2001d) <strong>and</strong> (2003b), <strong>and</strong> Reid (2003)).In light of <strong>the</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation of <strong>the</strong> common <strong>in</strong>terests, challenges <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>novation policy issues,both <strong>the</strong> Baltic <strong>and</strong> Nordic countries st<strong>and</strong> to benefit significantly from exchang<strong>in</strong>g policy views<strong>and</strong> experiences <strong>and</strong> for discuss<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> agree<strong>in</strong>g on common <strong>in</strong>itiatives <strong>and</strong> policy solutions forstreng<strong>the</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>novation systems <strong>and</strong> overall competitiveness. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, such cooperationwill streng<strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> regional economic <strong>in</strong>tegration of <strong>the</strong> Nordic/Baltic Sea area <strong>and</strong> create importantsynergy effects between <strong>the</strong>se two regions.In order for Nordic-Baltic cooperation on <strong>in</strong>novation, enterprise development <strong>and</strong> competitivenessto be effective <strong>and</strong> policy-relevant, discussions on <strong>and</strong> processes for streng<strong>the</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>novation systems<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Baltic <strong>and</strong> Nordic countries should <strong>in</strong>volve all relevant actors <strong>and</strong> stakeholders. In particular,<strong>the</strong>y should <strong>in</strong>clude representatives from policymak<strong>in</strong>g, academia <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess sector (accord<strong>in</strong>gto <strong>the</strong> triple helix model; see Box 6). In addition, <strong>the</strong>y should be based on a systemic, cross-sectoralor horizontal policy perspective <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>volve top level decision-makers.The cooperation could address <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g issues:• Barriers to <strong>and</strong> possibilities for Nordic-Baltic cooperation on <strong>in</strong>novation• Human capital issues (tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, education, lifelong learn<strong>in</strong>g)• Innovation policy: awareness <strong>and</strong> governance issues• Entrepreneurship• Cluster policies: models, best practices, directions for future policy design• Venture Capital: markets, policies, experiences• EU Structural Funds: How to use EU Structural Funds to streng<strong>the</strong>n <strong>in</strong>novation,competitiveness <strong>and</strong> convergence?• Commercialisation of R&D: How can researchers <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> private sector work toge<strong>the</strong>r toga<strong>in</strong> a return on <strong>in</strong>vestment?A streng<strong>the</strong>ned cooperation between <strong>the</strong> Nordic <strong>and</strong> Baltic countries on <strong>the</strong>se issues, could make asignificant contribution to streng<strong>the</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> conditions for <strong>in</strong>novation <strong>and</strong> enterprise development<strong>and</strong> thus for long-term prosperity <strong>and</strong> welfare <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> region as a whole. In <strong>the</strong> more immediatefuture, this <strong>in</strong>itiative would contribute substantially to ensur<strong>in</strong>g a successful accession of <strong>the</strong> New EUMember Countries <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Baltic Sea Region to <strong>the</strong> Internal <strong>Market</strong>.29For evaluations of <strong>the</strong> Swedish <strong>and</strong> Norwegian <strong>in</strong>novation systems, see Andersson et.al. (2002) <strong>and</strong> (2003a).96
CONCLUSIONSEU accession will not result <strong>in</strong> a dramatic dw<strong>in</strong>dl<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>SMEs</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> New Member Countries <strong>in</strong>general, or <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> B4 <strong>in</strong> particular. In this context, <strong>the</strong> pessimism of Polish companies as reflected<strong>in</strong> Eurochambres’ bus<strong>in</strong>ess survey (see Box 5), is probably exaggerated. However, EU accession willbr<strong>in</strong>g significant new challenges for <strong>SMEs</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> B4 countries. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>the</strong>se challenges will beheightened by <strong>the</strong> structural changes, summed-up <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> term ‘knowledge-based economy’, which iscurrently reshap<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> world economy. Toge<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong>se two factors will exert <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g pressures onenterprises to be <strong>in</strong>novative, <strong>in</strong> order to be competitive.The B4 countries have undergone, <strong>and</strong> are still <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> process of undergo<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> transition fromplanned economies to function<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> thriv<strong>in</strong>g market economies. The B4 have made substantial<strong>and</strong> impressive progress <strong>in</strong> this process, by implement<strong>in</strong>g a number far-reach<strong>in</strong>g structural reforms<strong>and</strong> establish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>stitutions necessary for <strong>the</strong> development of function<strong>in</strong>g markets. The progressis reflected <strong>in</strong> significant <strong>and</strong> rapid <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> use of ICT with some countries – which <strong>in</strong>itiallystarted out a dramatically lower level – rapidly approach<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> levels of some of <strong>the</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g EUMember States. It is also reflected <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> high average GDP which particularly Estonia, Latvia,Lithuania, <strong>and</strong> Pol<strong>and</strong> have experienced s<strong>in</strong>ce 1995, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> ability of <strong>the</strong>se countries to attractsubstantial foreign direct <strong>in</strong>vestment.Policymakers <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> B4 are <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly recognis<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> importance of <strong>in</strong>novation policy forcompetitiveness <strong>and</strong> economic development. Similarly, <strong>the</strong> importance of a dynamic SME sector,for economic growth <strong>and</strong> job creation, is widely acknowledged. In <strong>the</strong> past years, <strong>the</strong> governments<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>se countries have worked actively to design or improve national policies for <strong>in</strong>novation <strong>and</strong>enterprise development.None<strong>the</strong>less, a number of important policy challenges rema<strong>in</strong> with regard to enabl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> developmentof a critical mass of <strong>in</strong>novative <strong>SMEs</strong> which are able to contribute to ensur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> competitiveness <strong>and</strong>vitality of <strong>the</strong> B4 economies <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> S<strong>in</strong>gle <strong>Market</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> long term.This report has established that <strong>SMEs</strong> play a significant <strong>and</strong> grow<strong>in</strong>g role for <strong>the</strong> economies of <strong>the</strong>B4. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>SMEs</strong> are of crucial importance, as agents of economic renewal <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>novation, <strong>and</strong>for secur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> future competitiveness of <strong>the</strong> transition economies. Recent evidence shows that <strong>the</strong>reis a clear need to streng<strong>the</strong>n competitiveness <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>novation <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> B4 <strong>in</strong> general, <strong>and</strong> particularly<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> SME sector. Given that compliance costs <strong>in</strong> connection with accession weigh relatively moreheavily on <strong>SMEs</strong> than on larger companies, <strong>and</strong> given <strong>the</strong> shortage of capital, lack of managementcapabilities <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r human capital resources, <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r barriers felt most acutely by <strong>SMEs</strong>, <strong>the</strong>reis a considerable risk that a significant number of <strong>SMEs</strong> might never make it to <strong>the</strong> stage where <strong>the</strong>ycan capitalise on <strong>the</strong> significant opportunities offered by <strong>the</strong> S<strong>in</strong>gle <strong>Market</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge-basedeconomy.At a time when <strong>the</strong>y are still <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> process of complet<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> transition to function<strong>in</strong>g marketeconomies, <strong>the</strong> people, companies <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>stitutions of <strong>the</strong> B4 countries are fac<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> next daunt<strong>in</strong>gtask of adapt<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> challenges presented by accession to <strong>the</strong> S<strong>in</strong>gle <strong>Market</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> rapidly<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g importance of knowledge <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>novation for competitiveness <strong>and</strong> economic growth. Oneof <strong>the</strong> key challenges for policymakers is to act <strong>in</strong> support of <strong>SMEs</strong>, by design<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> implement<strong>in</strong>gpolicies that will promote <strong>the</strong> ability <strong>and</strong> will<strong>in</strong>gness of a critical mass of <strong>SMEs</strong> to engage <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>novativeactivities.97
- Page 1 and 2:
Sylvia Schwaag SergerEmily HanssonC
- Page 4 and 5:
About the International Organisatio
- Page 7:
PREFACEAccession to the Single Mark
- Page 10 and 11:
enterprise development. There are n
- Page 12 and 13:
BOXESBox 1: The ‘Knowledge-Based
- Page 15 and 16:
INTRODUCTIONAfter more than 10 year
- Page 17 and 18:
CHAPTER 1: FROM STABILISATION TO IN
- Page 19:
increased competitive pressure as B
- Page 22 and 23:
Box 2: On Innovation and Innovation
- Page 24 and 25:
Table 5: GDP Growth 1995-2003 in Se
- Page 26 and 27:
Table 7: Relative Strengths and Wea
- Page 28 and 29:
Box 3: The Indicator ProblemExistin
- Page 31 and 32:
CHAPTER 2:BALTIC SMEs - AGENTS OF F
- Page 33 and 34:
Table 9: Average Annual Growth of S
- Page 35 and 36:
Box 4: Overview of Selected Multina
- Page 37 and 38:
The Role of SMEs in Transitional Ec
- Page 39 and 40:
e to the potential advantage of the
- Page 41 and 42:
A common measurement of business ac
- Page 43 and 44:
Figure 8: Labour Productivity per P
- Page 45 and 46:
Figure 10: Employment in Med/Hi-tec
- Page 47 and 48: Summing up, there are fewer economi
- Page 49 and 50: Overall, SMEs tend to lack the fina
- Page 51 and 52: Figure 12: Enterprises with Innovat
- Page 53 and 54: Figure 14: Proportion of Enterprise
- Page 55 and 56: Table 14: Barriers to Innovation fo
- Page 57 and 58: Some interesting examples of cluste
- Page 59 and 60: CHAPTER 3:POLICIES PROMOTING SMEs A
- Page 61 and 62: National governments themselves wil
- Page 63 and 64: Institutional StructureIn all of th
- Page 65 and 66: EU countries (innovation relay cent
- Page 67 and 68: LITHUANIAAgency/OrganisationLithuan
- Page 69 and 70: From the private sector, the chambe
- Page 71 and 72: On the whole, the B4 have relativel
- Page 73 and 74: LITHUANIAProgramme/Policy DocumentI
- Page 75 and 76: Table 19: B4 National Rankings of A
- Page 77 and 78: Box 11: Structural Funds to the Can
- Page 79 and 80: Box 12: On SMEs and FinancingIt doe
- Page 81 and 82: examples of evaluations of national
- Page 83 and 84: CHAPTER 4:CHALLENGES AND RECOMMENDA
- Page 85 and 86: General challengesBased on our own
- Page 87 and 88: the above-mentioned channels. 27 On
- Page 89 and 90: the EU average and particularly wit
- Page 91 and 92: RecommendationsBased on the challen
- Page 93 and 94: CHAPTER 5:A VISION OF A NORDIC-BALT
- Page 95 and 96: addition, they are the most advance
- Page 97: countries. One such sign is the rap
- Page 101 and 102: REFERENCESAlfonso, Antonio, Ludger
- Page 103 and 104: European Commission (2003f), Compre
- Page 105 and 106: Eurostat (2004a), SMEs in the Candi
- Page 107 and 108: Statistical Office of Estonia (2004
- Page 109 and 110: APPENDIX I:Agenda for Working Group
- Page 111 and 112: DAY 2:POLICY SOLUTIONS9:30-10:30 In
- Page 113 and 114: APPENDIX II:Participants in the IKE
- Page 115 and 116: APPENDIX III:Conclusions from the I
- Page 117 and 118: APPENDIX IV:Summary of the Panel se
- Page 119 and 120: Regarding the role of policymaking,
- Page 121 and 122: APPENDIX V:Description of Field Stu
- Page 123 and 124: Mr. Miroslaw MarekMr. Talis Millers
- Page 126: IKED - International Organisation f