function as such. Areas to be addressed <strong>in</strong> this context <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>the</strong> management <strong>and</strong> organisation of<strong>in</strong>stitutions <strong>and</strong> processes as well as <strong>the</strong> development of appropriate human resource strategies.• The general awareness of <strong>in</strong>novation policy <strong>and</strong> of its importance for economic growth <strong>and</strong>competitiveness.As po<strong>in</strong>ted out <strong>in</strong> a recent evaluation of <strong>in</strong>novation policy <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> C<strong>and</strong>idate Countries, “<strong>in</strong>novation, <strong>in</strong>its broadest sense, rema<strong>in</strong>s a poorly understood, <strong>and</strong> even accepted, concept” ((European Commission2001a), p.158). There is a need to <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>and</strong> improve <strong>the</strong> general awareness <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g of<strong>in</strong>novation <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>novation policy, <strong>and</strong> of its importance for economic growth <strong>and</strong> competitiveness.Increased awareness <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g is vital for ensur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> coord<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> effectiveness ofpolicies.• Improv<strong>in</strong>g methods <strong>and</strong> data for measur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> compar<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>novation performance.In order to ensure <strong>the</strong> design of effective <strong>and</strong> resource-efficient <strong>in</strong>novation policies, <strong>the</strong>re is a needto improve data <strong>and</strong> methods for assess<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> compar<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>novation performance <strong>and</strong> capacity,particularly with regard to <strong>SMEs</strong>.Specific challengesTurn<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> specific challenges for policymakers striv<strong>in</strong>g to promote SME development <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>B4 countries, a number of areas where <strong>the</strong>re is still considerable room for improvement can beidentified 25 :• Insufficient access to start-capital <strong>and</strong> long-term <strong>in</strong>vestment sourcesLack of access to capital, as one of <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>cipal barriers for start<strong>in</strong>g new companies <strong>and</strong> exp<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>gcompanies, is a problem which is by no means unique to <strong>the</strong> B4. In bus<strong>in</strong>ess surveys conducted<strong>in</strong>, <strong>and</strong> analyses carried out on, <strong>the</strong> EU-15, for example this factor is generally listed as one of <strong>the</strong>major challenges fac<strong>in</strong>g <strong>SMEs</strong> (see, for example, European Commission (2004), p.5; <strong>and</strong> EuropeanCommission (2003u), p.22). Similarly, a recent bus<strong>in</strong>ess survey analysis concluded that “almost allEuropean bus<strong>in</strong>esses feel that national governments <strong>and</strong>/or <strong>the</strong> European Union could do moreto help small enterprises to get access to f<strong>in</strong>ance” (European Commission (2003t), p.41). Hav<strong>in</strong>gsaid that, however, <strong>in</strong> our analysis we have found strong <strong>in</strong>dications that <strong>in</strong>sufficient access to startcapital <strong>and</strong> to long-term <strong>in</strong>vestment sources is a greater problem for <strong>SMEs</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> B4, than <strong>in</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>gEU Member States. Start-up companies have nei<strong>the</strong>r collateral nor a credit history, <strong>and</strong> often lackexperience <strong>in</strong> complet<strong>in</strong>g loan applications. F<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g for high-risk projects is generally <strong>in</strong>accessible,or is so limited that only a few, select bus<strong>in</strong>ess projects receive f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g. A number of specific problemscan be identified <strong>in</strong> this context. Firstly, banks <strong>in</strong> many of <strong>the</strong> B4 appear to lack both <strong>the</strong> experience<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> organisational, <strong>in</strong>stitutional <strong>and</strong> managerial means required to function as effective f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>gsources for <strong>SMEs</strong>. 26 Secondly, while <strong>the</strong>re are provisions for receiv<strong>in</strong>g start-up loans or grants (fromPAED, SMEDA, LDA, Enterprise Estonia, among o<strong>the</strong>rs <strong>in</strong> Pol<strong>and</strong>, Lithuania, Latvia <strong>and</strong> Estonia,respectively), <strong>the</strong>se grants are generally limited to st<strong>and</strong>ard sums which often do not meet <strong>the</strong> needsfor start<strong>in</strong>g up hi-tech companies or o<strong>the</strong>r companies, which might have a strong potential to grow,but which also require significantly higher <strong>in</strong>itial capital <strong>in</strong>vestments than those available through25Sources for this summary list <strong>in</strong>clude UNECE report on <strong>SMEs</strong> <strong>in</strong> Countries <strong>in</strong> Transition, 2003; European Commission Report on <strong>the</strong> Implementation of<strong>the</strong> European Charter for Small Enterprises <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> C<strong>and</strong>idate Countries for Accession to <strong>the</strong> European Union; <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual country <strong>in</strong>put from Workshopon Design<strong>in</strong>g Policies for Innovation <strong>and</strong> Enterprise Development June 16/17 2003 <strong>in</strong> Riga.26See, for example, presentation by Emmanual Berck, DG Enterprise at CEI Summit Economic Forum, 2003 http://www.google.com/url?sa=U&start=1&q=http://www.ce<strong>in</strong>et.org/download/sef_2004/sSU_%2520Berck.ppt&e=7704 . This f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g was confirmed <strong>in</strong> our <strong>in</strong>terviews with policymakers <strong>and</strong> representativesof <strong>the</strong> bank<strong>in</strong>g sector <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> B4.84
<strong>the</strong> above-mentioned channels. 27 Once a company has been started, <strong>the</strong> third challenge <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> B4 is<strong>the</strong> lack of function<strong>in</strong>g pre-seed, seed <strong>and</strong> venture capital <strong>and</strong> secondary capital markets. Overall, <strong>the</strong>f<strong>in</strong>ancial structures that would be necessary for enabl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> start-up <strong>and</strong> development of <strong>in</strong>novative,<strong>and</strong> often high-risk, projects <strong>and</strong> companies are not <strong>in</strong> place or too fragmented or weak (see Box 12above <strong>and</strong> Box 13 below).Box 13: Good Practice Example of Public Intervention <strong>in</strong> Venture Capital *In recent years, <strong>the</strong> general view on <strong>the</strong> public sector’s role <strong>in</strong> venture capital markets hastransformed. Previously, it was widely viewed that <strong>the</strong> public sector should absta<strong>in</strong> from gett<strong>in</strong>gactively <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> capital markets, <strong>and</strong> that <strong>the</strong> market forces of supply <strong>and</strong> dem<strong>and</strong> shouldgovern capital market movements. However, recent market trends have led to a more riskaverseattitude <strong>and</strong> a decrease <strong>in</strong> funds <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> earliest (seed <strong>and</strong> start-up) <strong>in</strong>vestment stages.This has a strong impact on <strong>the</strong> newest <strong>and</strong> smallest companies, limit<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir ability to <strong>in</strong>vestfor <strong>in</strong>novation <strong>and</strong> growth. With<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> public sector, <strong>the</strong>re is grow<strong>in</strong>g attention to this “marketimperfection”, <strong>and</strong> a desire to address <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g needs of young, <strong>in</strong>novative (<strong>and</strong> mostoften, small) companies.Vaekstfonden <strong>in</strong> Denmark provides a good example of constructive <strong>and</strong> successful publicsector <strong>in</strong>tervention to support <strong>and</strong> develop venture capital markets, provid<strong>in</strong>g better access tofunds for newer, smaller companies.Vaekstfonden was established <strong>in</strong> 1992 as a state-backed <strong>in</strong>vestment company, provid<strong>in</strong>g f<strong>in</strong>anceto fast-grow<strong>in</strong>g Danish companies <strong>and</strong> act<strong>in</strong>g as a fund-of-fund <strong>in</strong>vestor <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> private equitysector <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Nordic region. Its mission is to streng<strong>the</strong>n development <strong>and</strong> renewal <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Danisheconomy by procur<strong>in</strong>g f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g for promis<strong>in</strong>g projects <strong>in</strong> small- <strong>and</strong> medium-size bus<strong>in</strong>esses.Investments are focused on early stage ventures ma<strong>in</strong>ly with<strong>in</strong> life science, med- <strong>and</strong> high-techcompanies, as well as mezzan<strong>in</strong>e f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g to a broad range of branches. Vaekstfonden has acapital base of 400 billion, mak<strong>in</strong>g it one of <strong>the</strong> largest players on <strong>the</strong> Danish VC market, <strong>and</strong>is <strong>the</strong> largest early-stage <strong>in</strong>vestor <strong>in</strong> Denmark.A recent strategy shift <strong>in</strong> 2001 supports three ma<strong>in</strong> actions: <strong>the</strong> activation of a passive capitalbase to ensure that capital reaches <strong>the</strong> segments where <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial markets hesitate to <strong>in</strong>vest;establishment of a fund-of-funds to build a stronger Danish venture market; <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased useof equity <strong>in</strong> direct <strong>in</strong>vestments to ensure that Vaekstfonden gets its fair share of future upsidereturns. Vaekstfonden’s three bus<strong>in</strong>ess areas <strong>in</strong>clude direct <strong>in</strong>vestments, fund-of-funds <strong>and</strong>Vaekstaution (a loan guarantee scheme for <strong>SMEs</strong>). More <strong>in</strong>formation about Vaekstfonden canbe found on <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>ternet site at: www.vaekstfonden.dk.* A recent IKED article on The Role of Public Intervention <strong>in</strong> Venture Capital can be found on <strong>the</strong> World Bank’s Knowledge Economy DevelopmentGateway at: http://www.developmentgateway.org/node/130667/sdm/docview?docid=93227127Exam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> challenges for high-tech <strong>SMEs</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> EU-15, a report commissioned by <strong>the</strong> European Commission found that[t]he situation of highly <strong>in</strong>novative <strong>SMEs</strong> with regard to obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g f<strong>in</strong>ance is characterized by a number of specific features, which <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciple make it more difficultfor <strong>the</strong>m to access f<strong>in</strong>ance <strong>and</strong> which may cause market failures (e.g. risk/uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty, long development periods, <strong>in</strong>tangible ra<strong>the</strong>r than tangible assets, <strong>in</strong>formationasymmetry) (European Commission (2002g), p.48).85
- Page 1 and 2:
Sylvia Schwaag SergerEmily HanssonC
- Page 4 and 5:
About the International Organisatio
- Page 7:
PREFACEAccession to the Single Mark
- Page 10 and 11:
enterprise development. There are n
- Page 12 and 13:
BOXESBox 1: The ‘Knowledge-Based
- Page 15 and 16:
INTRODUCTIONAfter more than 10 year
- Page 17 and 18:
CHAPTER 1: FROM STABILISATION TO IN
- Page 19:
increased competitive pressure as B
- Page 22 and 23:
Box 2: On Innovation and Innovation
- Page 24 and 25:
Table 5: GDP Growth 1995-2003 in Se
- Page 26 and 27:
Table 7: Relative Strengths and Wea
- Page 28 and 29:
Box 3: The Indicator ProblemExistin
- Page 31 and 32:
CHAPTER 2:BALTIC SMEs - AGENTS OF F
- Page 33 and 34:
Table 9: Average Annual Growth of S
- Page 35 and 36: Box 4: Overview of Selected Multina
- Page 37 and 38: The Role of SMEs in Transitional Ec
- Page 39 and 40: e to the potential advantage of the
- Page 41 and 42: A common measurement of business ac
- Page 43 and 44: Figure 8: Labour Productivity per P
- Page 45 and 46: Figure 10: Employment in Med/Hi-tec
- Page 47 and 48: Summing up, there are fewer economi
- Page 49 and 50: Overall, SMEs tend to lack the fina
- Page 51 and 52: Figure 12: Enterprises with Innovat
- Page 53 and 54: Figure 14: Proportion of Enterprise
- Page 55 and 56: Table 14: Barriers to Innovation fo
- Page 57 and 58: Some interesting examples of cluste
- Page 59 and 60: CHAPTER 3:POLICIES PROMOTING SMEs A
- Page 61 and 62: National governments themselves wil
- Page 63 and 64: Institutional StructureIn all of th
- Page 65 and 66: EU countries (innovation relay cent
- Page 67 and 68: LITHUANIAAgency/OrganisationLithuan
- Page 69 and 70: From the private sector, the chambe
- Page 71 and 72: On the whole, the B4 have relativel
- Page 73 and 74: LITHUANIAProgramme/Policy DocumentI
- Page 75 and 76: Table 19: B4 National Rankings of A
- Page 77 and 78: Box 11: Structural Funds to the Can
- Page 79 and 80: Box 12: On SMEs and FinancingIt doe
- Page 81 and 82: examples of evaluations of national
- Page 83 and 84: CHAPTER 4:CHALLENGES AND RECOMMENDA
- Page 85: General challengesBased on our own
- Page 89 and 90: the EU average and particularly wit
- Page 91 and 92: RecommendationsBased on the challen
- Page 93 and 94: CHAPTER 5:A VISION OF A NORDIC-BALT
- Page 95 and 96: addition, they are the most advance
- Page 97 and 98: countries. One such sign is the rap
- Page 99 and 100: CONCLUSIONSEU accession will not re
- Page 101 and 102: REFERENCESAlfonso, Antonio, Ludger
- Page 103 and 104: European Commission (2003f), Compre
- Page 105 and 106: Eurostat (2004a), SMEs in the Candi
- Page 107 and 108: Statistical Office of Estonia (2004
- Page 109 and 110: APPENDIX I:Agenda for Working Group
- Page 111 and 112: DAY 2:POLICY SOLUTIONS9:30-10:30 In
- Page 113 and 114: APPENDIX II:Participants in the IKE
- Page 115 and 116: APPENDIX III:Conclusions from the I
- Page 117 and 118: APPENDIX IV:Summary of the Panel se
- Page 119 and 120: Regarding the role of policymaking,
- Page 121 and 122: APPENDIX V:Description of Field Stu
- Page 123 and 124: Mr. Miroslaw MarekMr. Talis Millers
- Page 126: IKED - International Organisation f