• Lack of cooperation between bus<strong>in</strong>esses, research <strong>in</strong>stitutions <strong>and</strong> state agencies, <strong>and</strong> lack of crossborderSME partnershipsIn recent years, researchers <strong>and</strong> policymakers are <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly recogniz<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>in</strong>novative <strong>SMEs</strong> are<strong>the</strong> foundation of a strong national <strong>in</strong>novation system <strong>and</strong> a pr<strong>in</strong>cipal driver of competitiveness <strong>and</strong>growth. In addition, <strong>and</strong> perhaps more importantly, <strong>the</strong>re is a grow<strong>in</strong>g underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g that networks<strong>and</strong> l<strong>in</strong>kages – sometimes referred to as cluster<strong>in</strong>g – between <strong>SMEs</strong> but also between <strong>SMEs</strong> <strong>and</strong> LSEs,between <strong>SMEs</strong> <strong>and</strong> universities <strong>and</strong> research <strong>in</strong>stitutions, <strong>and</strong> between <strong>SMEs</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> public sector,are important, <strong>and</strong> often crucial for enabl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> development of <strong>in</strong>novative <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternationallycompetitive <strong>SMEs</strong>. 28 Although many of <strong>the</strong> B4 countries have <strong>the</strong> basic components needed todevelop <strong>SMEs</strong>, <strong>the</strong>y all (except for Pol<strong>and</strong>) lack <strong>the</strong> size <strong>and</strong> scale to compete <strong>in</strong>dependently. In orderto succeed, <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual actors need to cooperate more closely, <strong>and</strong> seek network<strong>in</strong>g partners beyondnational borders.• Low national <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> R&DR&D <strong>in</strong>vestment is viewed as <strong>the</strong> best proxy for <strong>in</strong>novation, as it <strong>in</strong>dicates <strong>the</strong> level of potentialfuture output <strong>in</strong> terms of new products <strong>and</strong> processes. As shown <strong>in</strong> Chapter 1, <strong>the</strong> B4 have a muchlower average <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> R&D (as a % of GDP) than Member Countries <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> EU, <strong>and</strong> arethus considered as hav<strong>in</strong>g a lower <strong>in</strong>novative potential. Policymakers <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> B4 underst<strong>and</strong> that thisis a key challenge <strong>and</strong> have prioritised action <strong>in</strong> this area <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir National Innovation Programmes- with goals of <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> national level of R&D <strong>in</strong>vestment. It is not sufficient, however, simplyto <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>the</strong> level of public <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> R&D. An <strong>in</strong>crease is needed from both <strong>the</strong> public <strong>and</strong>private sectors. As shown <strong>in</strong> Chapter 3, <strong>the</strong> private sector’s <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> R&D is low <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> B4,both <strong>in</strong> terms of its percentage of GDP <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> terms of its share of total national expenditure onR&D (rang<strong>in</strong>g between 20-30%, compared to approximately 55% <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> EU-15). To address thisspecific challenge, <strong>the</strong> B4 governments must identify <strong>the</strong> barriers h<strong>in</strong>der<strong>in</strong>g private sector <strong>in</strong>vestment<strong>in</strong> R&D, <strong>and</strong> f<strong>in</strong>d ways to “turn <strong>the</strong> tide”. Specifically, policymakers should consider dismantl<strong>in</strong>gexist<strong>in</strong>g dis<strong>in</strong>centives to R&D <strong>in</strong>vestment (e.g. fiscal measures such as taxes on R&D expenditures),<strong>and</strong> possibly establish<strong>in</strong>g appropriate <strong>in</strong>centives/fiscal measures to <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g private sector <strong>in</strong>vestment(<strong>and</strong> collaboration between <strong>the</strong> public <strong>and</strong> private sectors) <strong>in</strong> R&D.• Entrepreneurship not seen as a key competenceMany of <strong>the</strong> B4 countries still treat entrepreneurship as a topic for vocational education, ra<strong>the</strong>r thana key component of <strong>the</strong> basic education curriculum. More efforts need to be made to promote anentrepreneurial culture.• Fragmentation <strong>and</strong> poor availability of bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>and</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess servicesAll of <strong>the</strong> B4 countries have <strong>in</strong>itiated a number of activities to support bus<strong>in</strong>esses (bus<strong>in</strong>essdevelopment <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>novation centers, advisory <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation offices, bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong>cubators <strong>and</strong>technology parks). However, <strong>the</strong> general view from <strong>SMEs</strong> is that <strong>the</strong>re is still a need for streng<strong>the</strong>nedskills <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational market entry, market<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> promotion.• Insufficient access to new technologyEven though <strong>in</strong>ternet penetration, telephone <strong>and</strong> cellular access have <strong>in</strong>creased significantly <strong>in</strong> all B4countries over <strong>the</strong> past years, <strong>the</strong>re is still a gap <strong>in</strong> access to new technology when compared with28For a more <strong>in</strong>-depth discussion of <strong>the</strong> importance of clusters <strong>and</strong> cluster<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> this context, see, for example, Andersson et.al. (2004c).86
<strong>the</strong> EU average <strong>and</strong> particularly with <strong>in</strong>ternationally lead<strong>in</strong>g countries, such as <strong>the</strong> Nordic countries.With regard to ICT access <strong>and</strong> usage, Estonia is considerably more advanced than <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r B4countries. Latvia’s performance has dramatically improved <strong>in</strong> a number of areas <strong>in</strong> recent years. Of<strong>the</strong> four countries, Pol<strong>and</strong> seems to be faced with <strong>the</strong> largest challenges <strong>in</strong> this aspect. (For a practicalexample of address<strong>in</strong>g this issue, see Box 14.)Box 14: W<strong>in</strong>dow to <strong>the</strong> Future <strong>in</strong>itiative <strong>in</strong> LithuaniaIn May 2002, lead<strong>in</strong>g Lithuanian bus<strong>in</strong>esses (fixed <strong>and</strong> mobile telecommunications, banks,<strong>and</strong> IT companies) came toge<strong>the</strong>r to form <strong>the</strong> W<strong>in</strong>dow to <strong>the</strong> Future alliance. The goal was toachieve <strong>the</strong> same average <strong>in</strong>ternet penetration <strong>in</strong> Lithuanian as <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> European Union with<strong>in</strong>three years through three fields of activity: broad public access, tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g on computer usage <strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>ternet, development of electronic content <strong>and</strong> services relevant to civil society. At <strong>the</strong> end of2002, <strong>the</strong> Lithuanian government jo<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>the</strong> alliance, agree<strong>in</strong>g to establish 300 new <strong>in</strong>ternetaccess locations <strong>and</strong> allocate LTL 5.6 million to <strong>the</strong> project over three years.Dur<strong>in</strong>g 2003, 66 public <strong>in</strong>ternet access po<strong>in</strong>ts were established throughout Lithuania,enabl<strong>in</strong>g citizens to spend over 1.500.000 hours on <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternet. A free <strong>in</strong>ternet tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gcourse is planned for 20.000 people. It is <strong>the</strong> alliance founders’ goal that <strong>the</strong> project willprompt closer collaboration between <strong>the</strong> public <strong>and</strong> private sectors on <strong>the</strong> development of <strong>the</strong><strong>in</strong>formation society, <strong>and</strong> will provide a base for local governmental <strong>in</strong>stitutions to act <strong>in</strong> thisarea, stimulat<strong>in</strong>g municipalities to take fur<strong>the</strong>r steps <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g public <strong>in</strong>ternetaccess po<strong>in</strong>ts accord<strong>in</strong>g to local needs.Source: W<strong>in</strong>dows to <strong>the</strong> Future <strong>in</strong>ternet site: www.langasiateiti.lt• Insufficiently competitive bus<strong>in</strong>ess environment (compet<strong>in</strong>g on cheap products)The basic math <strong>and</strong> science education is viewed as a major asset <strong>in</strong> all <strong>the</strong> B4 countries. The Acced<strong>in</strong>gCountries are catch<strong>in</strong>g up to <strong>the</strong> EU average with approximately 21% of <strong>the</strong>ir total populationwork<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> an S&T occupation or hav<strong>in</strong>g a tertiary education level, compared to approximately27% <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> EU, <strong>and</strong> with a faster expansion <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> number of graduates than <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> EU (Eurostat(2003d)).There is an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> total number of graduates. On average, however, currently onlyapproximately one half of graduates go on to work <strong>in</strong> an S&T occupation rais<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> question ofwhe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> scientific base is be<strong>in</strong>g leveraged appropriately. Thus, although <strong>the</strong> B4 have strong,traditional research <strong>and</strong> science bases, <strong>and</strong> are catch<strong>in</strong>g-up <strong>in</strong> tertiary graduates, <strong>the</strong> benefit of this hasnot yet been seen <strong>in</strong> terms of national competitiveness. There are <strong>in</strong>dications that this is chang<strong>in</strong>g,but overall, <strong>the</strong>se countries are still compet<strong>in</strong>g on low labour costs <strong>and</strong> cheap products ra<strong>the</strong>r than on<strong>the</strong>ir ability to design <strong>and</strong> sell unique products, processes or applications of <strong>the</strong>ir own. To some extent,this tendency is reflected <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> patterns of FDI flow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> C<strong>and</strong>idate Countries. Accord<strong>in</strong>gto Barry, <strong>the</strong> evidence suggests that “[m]ost current CEE [Central <strong>and</strong> Eastern European]-boundFDI comes from Europe ra<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong> US, is market seek<strong>in</strong>g ra<strong>the</strong>r than export-oriented, <strong>and</strong> isrelatively low-tech” (Barry (2002)).87
- Page 1 and 2:
Sylvia Schwaag SergerEmily HanssonC
- Page 4 and 5:
About the International Organisatio
- Page 7:
PREFACEAccession to the Single Mark
- Page 10 and 11:
enterprise development. There are n
- Page 12 and 13:
BOXESBox 1: The ‘Knowledge-Based
- Page 15 and 16:
INTRODUCTIONAfter more than 10 year
- Page 17 and 18:
CHAPTER 1: FROM STABILISATION TO IN
- Page 19:
increased competitive pressure as B
- Page 22 and 23:
Box 2: On Innovation and Innovation
- Page 24 and 25:
Table 5: GDP Growth 1995-2003 in Se
- Page 26 and 27:
Table 7: Relative Strengths and Wea
- Page 28 and 29:
Box 3: The Indicator ProblemExistin
- Page 31 and 32:
CHAPTER 2:BALTIC SMEs - AGENTS OF F
- Page 33 and 34:
Table 9: Average Annual Growth of S
- Page 35 and 36:
Box 4: Overview of Selected Multina
- Page 37 and 38: The Role of SMEs in Transitional Ec
- Page 39 and 40: e to the potential advantage of the
- Page 41 and 42: A common measurement of business ac
- Page 43 and 44: Figure 8: Labour Productivity per P
- Page 45 and 46: Figure 10: Employment in Med/Hi-tec
- Page 47 and 48: Summing up, there are fewer economi
- Page 49 and 50: Overall, SMEs tend to lack the fina
- Page 51 and 52: Figure 12: Enterprises with Innovat
- Page 53 and 54: Figure 14: Proportion of Enterprise
- Page 55 and 56: Table 14: Barriers to Innovation fo
- Page 57 and 58: Some interesting examples of cluste
- Page 59 and 60: CHAPTER 3:POLICIES PROMOTING SMEs A
- Page 61 and 62: National governments themselves wil
- Page 63 and 64: Institutional StructureIn all of th
- Page 65 and 66: EU countries (innovation relay cent
- Page 67 and 68: LITHUANIAAgency/OrganisationLithuan
- Page 69 and 70: From the private sector, the chambe
- Page 71 and 72: On the whole, the B4 have relativel
- Page 73 and 74: LITHUANIAProgramme/Policy DocumentI
- Page 75 and 76: Table 19: B4 National Rankings of A
- Page 77 and 78: Box 11: Structural Funds to the Can
- Page 79 and 80: Box 12: On SMEs and FinancingIt doe
- Page 81 and 82: examples of evaluations of national
- Page 83 and 84: CHAPTER 4:CHALLENGES AND RECOMMENDA
- Page 85 and 86: General challengesBased on our own
- Page 87: the above-mentioned channels. 27 On
- Page 91 and 92: RecommendationsBased on the challen
- Page 93 and 94: CHAPTER 5:A VISION OF A NORDIC-BALT
- Page 95 and 96: addition, they are the most advance
- Page 97 and 98: countries. One such sign is the rap
- Page 99 and 100: CONCLUSIONSEU accession will not re
- Page 101 and 102: REFERENCESAlfonso, Antonio, Ludger
- Page 103 and 104: European Commission (2003f), Compre
- Page 105 and 106: Eurostat (2004a), SMEs in the Candi
- Page 107 and 108: Statistical Office of Estonia (2004
- Page 109 and 110: APPENDIX I:Agenda for Working Group
- Page 111 and 112: DAY 2:POLICY SOLUTIONS9:30-10:30 In
- Page 113 and 114: APPENDIX II:Participants in the IKE
- Page 115 and 116: APPENDIX III:Conclusions from the I
- Page 117 and 118: APPENDIX IV:Summary of the Panel se
- Page 119 and 120: Regarding the role of policymaking,
- Page 121 and 122: APPENDIX V:Description of Field Stu
- Page 123 and 124: Mr. Miroslaw MarekMr. Talis Millers
- Page 126: IKED - International Organisation f