13.07.2015 Views

2011 Municipal Study - City of Brantford

2011 Municipal Study - City of Brantford

2011 Municipal Study - City of Brantford

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Municipal</strong> <strong>Study</strong> <strong>2011</strong>Unweighted Assessment Trends 2008-<strong>2011</strong>The tables on the next several pages reflect the change in unweighted assessment from 2008-<strong>2011</strong>.The changes include the impact <strong>of</strong> reassessment as well as growth. The table has been sorted fromlow to high for the 2010-<strong>2011</strong>% change in assessment. Communities experiencing population andeconomic growth are likely to experience short-run increases in property values. This is because, inthe short run, the housing supply is fixed and the increase in demand created by growth will forceprices up. Declining areas are more likely to see a decrease in the market value <strong>of</strong> properties or aslower than average increase in property values.Changein CVA2008 -2009Changein CVA2009 -2010Changein CVA2010 -<strong>2011</strong>RelativeRanking %increase2010-<strong>2011</strong>Niagara Falls 5.1% 14.0% -1.9% lowWindsor -6.1% 0.9% 0.8% lowThunder Bay 1.1% 3.1% 2.6% lowChatham-Kent 4.8% 3.9% 2.9% lowLeamington 2.6% 2.6% 3.0% lowKingsville N/A 2.9% 3.5% lowPort Colborne 5.5% 5.6% 4.2% lowSt. Catharines 5.4% 6.0% 4.2% lowPickering 0.5% 3.5% 4.6% lowSt. Marys N/A N/A 4.8% lowThorold 6.5% 6.5% 5.0% lowBrockville 7.0% 6.8% 5.1% lowGeorgina 5.2% 6.6% 5.3% lowStratford 5.5% 5.7% 5.3% lowCentral Elgin 5.0% 5.0% 5.4% lowSt. Thomas 7.9% 5.9% 5.4% lowMiddlesex Centre 6.0% 4.3% 5.5% lowWhitby 5.9% 5.5% 5.6% lowNewmarket 7.3% 6.3% 5.6% lowOttawa 6.6% 5.8% 5.8% lowOshawa 5.7% 5.0% 5.9% lowTillsonburg 6.7% 5.0% 5.9% lowPelham 8.0% 7.6% 6.0% lowClarington 7.0% 5.9% 6.1% lowAjax 8.7% 5.6% 6.2% midFort Erie 6.3% 7.0% 6.2% midLondon 7.0% 5.8% 6.3% midWainfleet 7.5% 7.2% 6.4% midKawartha Lakes 7.6% 6.7% 6.5% midMississauga 7.5% 7.1% 6.5% midLambton Shores N/A N/A 6.6% mid<strong>Brantford</strong> 8.0% 6.8% 6.6% midWelland 6.8% 6.2% 6.6% midKingston 9.7% 3.2% 6.7% midHamilton 7.4% 7.8% 6.7% midCambridge 7.3% 6.6% 6.7% midQuinte West 16.4% 7.5% 6.8% midNiagara-on-the-Lake 7.8% 8.0% 6.8% midBrampton 8.1% 6.6% 7.0% midChangein CVA2008 -2009Changein CVA2009 -2010Changein CVA2010 -<strong>2011</strong>RelativeRanking %increase2010-<strong>2011</strong>Peterborough 7.2% 6.1% 7.0% midEast Gwillimbury 5.8% 7.7% 7.0% midHalton Hills 8.2% 6.3% 7.0% midToronto 7.4% 7.1% 7.0% midBelleville 8.1% 7.7% 7.1% midRichmond Hill 7.5% 7.0% 7.1% midLincoln 8.4% 8.6% 7.1% midNorth Dumfries 8.2% 6.7% 7.2% midSarnia 7.4% 6.4% 7.2% midSault Ste. Marie 7.8% 7.9% 7.3% midOrangeville 7.9% 7.2% 7.4% midHuntsville 7.9% 8.0% 7.4% midAurora 6.7% 8.3% 7.4% midGuelph 8.6% 5.8% 7.5% highWaterloo 7.5% 6.7% 7.6% highKitchener 7.2% 7.1% 7.6% highNorth Bay 7.7% 7.3% 7.7% highTimmins 7.3% 8.2% 7.7% highBracebridge 9.2% 8.6% 7.8% highVaughan 9.0% 9.3% 8.1% highOakville 9.2% 8.4% 8.1% highWest Lincoln 7.2% 8.0% 8.1% highBurlington 8.9% 7.1% 8.2% highPrince Edward County 9.0% 7.0% 8.2% highGrimsby 8.6% 8.0% 8.2% highWellesley 8.7% 8.6% 8.4% highCaledon 9.7% 6.8% 8.5% highThe Blue Mountains N/A N/A 8.8% highMarkham 7.5% 7.6% 9.0% highWoolwich 8.9% 9.7% 9.1% highWilmot 9.2% 8.2% 9.2% highKing 6.2% 8.1% 9.3% highGravenhurst 8.4% 8.6% 9.4% highWhitchurch Stouffville 11.6% 9.9% 11.4% highBarrie 6.7% 7.1% 11.8% highGreater Sudbury 15.5% 10.3% 12.1% highMilton 15.7% 13.9% 14.5% highAverage 7.4% 6.9% 6.8%Median 7.5% 7.0% 6.9%Minimum -6.1% 0.9% -1.9%Maximum 16.4% 14.0% 14.5%Socio Economic Indicators32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!