13.07.2015 Views

Icon - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

Icon - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

Icon - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

the most taboo <strong>of</strong> all acts, the consumption <strong>of</strong> another human. <strong>The</strong> source for thecannibalism is evidently <strong>The</strong> Sufferings <strong>of</strong> the Crew <strong>of</strong> the Thomas, 192 but, once again,the poet has added the religious element.On another part <strong>of</strong> Don Juan, the Edinburgh Monthly Review thus also makes an errorin reading when it claims “an apparently fixed disbelief <strong>of</strong> futurity” in the poem. 193While many <strong>of</strong> the poet’s works do question the idea <strong>of</strong> post-mortem existence, thispoem represents the idea as true. In the initial shipwreck, “near two hundred souls/Had left their bodies” (2.55.433-4), and the subsequent discussion <strong>of</strong> Purgatoryimplies that the souls did not cease to exist upon their exit. “Nine souls more went” inthe swamping <strong>of</strong> the cutter (2.61.481): the souls are described as travelling, notperishing. Referring to Haidée and Juan, and their great love for one another, therhetor says, “<strong>The</strong>ir intense souls, into each other pour’d, /If souls could die, hadperished in that passion” (2.191.1523-4). <strong>The</strong> usage <strong>of</strong> the past-form conditionalstates that souls cannot die, and thus do exist beyond the death <strong>of</strong> the body. Don Juanaffirms the immortality <strong>of</strong> the soul, although it does go on to problematize thataffirmation later, in its engagements with agnosis.One single line which caused much contemporary comment was 8.9.70, with itscondemnation <strong>of</strong> Wordsworth’s address to God which says, “Yea, Carnage is thydaughter!” 194 Whereas the liberal Literary Examiner validates Byron’s criticism <strong>of</strong>Wordsworth’s “blasphemy”, 195 others took exception to Byron’s reference to it. 196Don Juan, however, continues by saying, “If he speak truth, she is Christ’s sister, and/Just now behaved as in the Holy Land.” (8.9.71-2). <strong>The</strong> carnage in the Holy Land192 Q.v. Galignani Edition, p.752b n3193 Edinburgh Monthly Review, October 1819, p.479 (797).194 Line 282 <strong>of</strong> the original version <strong>of</strong> “Ode, the morning <strong>of</strong> the day appointed for a generalThanksgiving, January 18, 1816”, later deleted by Wordsworth. Q.v. William Wordsworth, ShorterPoems, 1807-1820, ed. by Carl H. Ketcham (Ithaca: Cornell <strong>University</strong> Press, 1989).195 Literary Examiner, July 5, 1823, 6-12; July 12, 1823, 23-7, RR, III, 1358-64: p.25 (1363).196 <strong>The</strong> Literary Gazette includes Byron’s passage amongst a series <strong>of</strong> quotations which are followedby the dismissal “what the fool only says in his heart, the worse than fool publishes openly”(July 19,1823, 451-3, RR, IV, 1461-3: p.451 (1461), alluding to Psalm 14:1, “<strong>The</strong> fool hath said in his heart,<strong>The</strong>re is no God”). <strong>The</strong> British Critic and John Bull exonerate Wordsworth’s “inadvertent nonsense”whilst arraigning Byron’s “shameless blasphemy” and “vice” (British Critic, 2nd Series, XX (August1823), 178-88, RR, I, 331-336: p.184 (334); John Bull, July 20, 1823, 229, RR, III, 1220-1: p.229(1221)).118

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!