13.07.2015 Views

Icon - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

Icon - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

Icon - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>of</strong> Lord Byron (1978), and also the essays collected in Byron, the Bible and Religion:Essays from the Twelfth International Byron Seminar, edited by Wolf Z Hirst (1991),have all gone some way towards redressing this general lack. Knight’s work,however, is dedicated to reading Byron from his biography, and taking the poetry assupport to that enterprise. Looper’s compendium is useful, but it is a compendium,not a commentary. Byron, the Bible and Religion, on the other hand, is a very usefulcollection <strong>of</strong> essays, especially those by Hirst, Thorslev, and Ray Stevens, andparticularly in regard to Cain and Heaven and Earth.<strong>The</strong> critics whose work has been most useful to this study are spread across aconsiderable span <strong>of</strong> time. Samuel Chew’s Dramas <strong>of</strong> Lord Byron (1915), MichaelKennedy Joseph’s Byron the Poet (1964), and Robert M Ryan’s <strong>The</strong> RomanticReformation: Religious Politics in English Literature 1789-1824 (1997) are allvaluable to this study not just for the depth <strong>of</strong> their scholarship in general, but inparticular for the consideration <strong>of</strong> the religious aspects <strong>of</strong> Byron’s work. <strong>The</strong>yexamine much <strong>of</strong> what others slight. Ryan is one <strong>of</strong> the very few to realise, forexample, the role which Lucifer actually plays in Cain.All too frequently, the critics who slight the religious aspects <strong>of</strong> Byron’s works adoptinto their reading such presumptions as Byron’s “Calvinist background”, which is acritical issue in its own right. Annabella, Lady Byron, claimed that the poet “had thegloomiest Calvinistic tenets”, 12 and William Harness asserted that “Byron, from hisearly education in Scotland, had been taught to identify the principles <strong>of</strong> Christianitywith the extreme dogmas <strong>of</strong> Calvinism”. 13 A number <strong>of</strong> subsequent critics have thusread Calvinism into his depictions <strong>of</strong> faith.<strong>The</strong>se critics include E W Marjarum, on Byron being “haunted” by his “Calvinistictraining”, 14 Lovell, on Byron’s “Calvinistic concept <strong>of</strong> deity”, 15 and Marchand, on12 Annabella, Lady Byron, 5/3/55, quoted in Coleridge 13.262n.13 A G L’Estrange, <strong>The</strong> Literary Life <strong>of</strong> William Harness (London: Hurst and Blackett, 1871), p.13.14 Marjarum, p.21.15 Ernest J. Lovell, Jr, Byron: <strong>The</strong> Record <strong>of</strong> a Quest (Hamden, Connecticut: Archon Books, 1966),p.213.12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!