13.07.2015 Views

Icon - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

Icon - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

Icon - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Thou bold discoverer in an unknown sea,Of happy isles and happier tenants there;I ask thee not to prove a Sadducee;Still dream <strong>of</strong> Paradise, thou know’st not where,But lovest too well to bid thine erring brother share. (McGann 2.46:64-72).<strong>The</strong> “churlish Priest” has been replaced by the “holiest men” as the believers in theafterlife, strengthening the positive connotations <strong>of</strong> that position, while the Sadduceeremains, as does the negative valuation <strong>of</strong> that viewpoint. While Joseph describes thisdraught as expressing “a Lucretian contempt for the idea <strong>of</strong> an after-life”, 108 thatreading is somewhat at odds with the appeal against disbelief in line 70. <strong>The</strong> stanzadescribes the priest’s concept <strong>of</strong> an afterlife as a “phantasy”, but also speaks <strong>of</strong> “envy”<strong>of</strong> that very fantasy, demonstrating not contempt <strong>of</strong> such an idea but desire for it. <strong>The</strong>modal “may” in line 65 could as easily be speculative as dynamic, referring only tothe possibility that no afterlife will occur. 109 In both versions <strong>of</strong> this stanza, the idea<strong>of</strong> an afterlife is represented in positive terms, even though it is far from certain: thisuncertainty is decidedly unorthodox, from a dogmatic perspective, but also decidedlynot secularist. <strong>The</strong> final line is a criticism <strong>of</strong> hypocrisy, and, yet again, <strong>of</strong> a lack <strong>of</strong>love for one’s neighbour.<strong>The</strong> Deity<strong>The</strong> validation <strong>of</strong> belief is stronger with respect towards the deity. Gleckner describesthe narrator <strong>of</strong> CHP as having an “orthodox Christian bias”, a bias which Gleckner’sown position configures as “provincial”. 110 A bias at least towards theism is evident.In addition to general comments on religious belief and practice, there are singularlymonotheistic statements in CHP, ranging from the reference by Harold’s page tohaving no friend apart from his parents, and Harold, and “one above” (1.13.4.149), toexplicit statements by the narrator, such as the apostrophe to God in appeal for justiceto 2.45.404, and the address at the beginning <strong>of</strong> the description <strong>of</strong> Portugal: “Oh,108 Joseph, p.15; see also p.26.109 This is coherent with the idea <strong>of</strong> conditional immortality, explored in more detail with respect to theEastern Tales.110 Gleckner, p.59.66

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!