13.07.2015 Views

Icon - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

Icon - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

Icon - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

accept more readily the inconclusiveness <strong>of</strong> skeptical thought”, 216 and yet theacceptance <strong>of</strong> inconclusiveness is no more present in Don Juan than is the acceptance<strong>of</strong> conclusiveness. Andrew M Cooper is closer in saying, “Byron’s scepticism is lessa definite philosophic rationalism than a perpetual process <strong>of</strong> pragmaticadjustment”: 217 it is an atelic method, not a finished system. <strong>The</strong> activity <strong>of</strong>philosophizing thus remains a major component <strong>of</strong> the rhetor’s role in Don Juan:I love Wisdom more than she loves me;My tendency is to philosophizeOn most things, from a tyrant to a tree;But still the spouseless Virgin Knowledge flies.What are we? and whence came we? what shall beOur ultimate existence? what’s our present?Are questions answerless, and yet incessant. (6.63.498-504).<strong>The</strong>se questions being “incessant” means that the issues are not simply abandoned,and the rhetor does not relax either into an assured materialism or into a complacentapathy regarding metaphysics. 218 Instead, there is a constant attempt to answer theunanswerable, regardless <strong>of</strong> the prediction <strong>of</strong> complete absence <strong>of</strong> lasting success:I would solicit free discussionUpon all points no matter what, or whose –Because as Ages upon Ages push on,[…]What was a paradox becomes a truth orA something like it – as bear witness Luther! (17.6.41-3, 7-8).<strong>The</strong> ideological stability <strong>of</strong> lasting philosophical success, however, is not necessaryfor a thinker who is capable <strong>of</strong> holding contradictory propositions in tension: “I leave216 McCabe, ‘A Secret Prepossession: Skepticism in Byron’s Don Juan’, Renascence, 28 (1975), pp3-14: 7.217 Cooper, ‘Shipwreck and Skepticism in Don Juan’, Keats-Shelley Journal, 32 (1983), 83-80 (p.75).218 This is wherein any such system as Pyrrhonism does not apply, because the traditional stoiccalmness is not attained by the rhetor <strong>of</strong> Don Juan.139

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!