13.07.2015 Views

Icon - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

Icon - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

Icon - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>of</strong> the system’s own primary values. That same dogma did not have universalacceptance in Byron’s own day.Unknowing is a common feature <strong>of</strong> Don Juan, and much <strong>of</strong> the poem expressesepistemological doubt. At times, this is focussed upon metaphysical knowledge, but afew <strong>of</strong> the instances problematize knowledge in general: “Socrates said, our onlyknowledge was / “To know that nothing could be known”” (7.5.33-4, echoing CHP2.7.56). Don Juan contains enough references to doubt as to constitute an aporeticdiscourse. At times, generalised epistemological doubt seems to be the central topic:“How little do we know that which we are! /How less what we may be!” (15.99.787-8). Ignorance and doubt are universalised, as the rhetor, in borrowing a moment fromByron’s own life, says, “I've stood upon Achilles’ tomb, /And heard Troy doubted;Time will doubt <strong>of</strong> Rome” (4.101.807-8). <strong>The</strong> assertion that Rome will be doubted isa clear demonstration that dubiousness is far from being evidence against facticity,and is instead a natural result <strong>of</strong> human nature and especially <strong>of</strong> human ignorance.Part <strong>of</strong> the consideration <strong>of</strong> the limits <strong>of</strong> human knowledge is the devaluation <strong>of</strong>philosophy, from the poem’s not launching in medias res to the commentary onJuan’s youthful cogitations:’Twas strange that one so young should thus concernHis brain about the action <strong>of</strong> the sky;If you think ’twas philosophy that this did,I can’t help thinking puberty assisted. (1.93.743-4).Lambro is later described as being ignorant, just like a philosopher (3.26.204-8). AsCharles R McCabe notes, Byron’s rhetoric “probes satirically and ironically intoseveral fundamental religious and philosophical presuppositions”, destabilising them.Philosophy suffers more than religion, particularly through not being separated intoidealised and fallen varieties. Frequently, philosophy is a heuristic exercise, and so itfalls under the criticism <strong>of</strong> Don Juan’s vehement epistemological doubt. WhatMcCabe goes on to say, following Hoagwood’s viewpoint, is that this “prepares us to138

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!