13.07.2015 Views

Icon - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

Icon - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

Icon - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Its poetical merits have been extolled to the skies by its admirers, and thePriest and the Levite, though they have joined to anathematise it, have not,when they came in its way, “passed by on the other side.” 134Strikingly, John Gibson Lockhart’s article on Cantos IX to XI in Blackwood’sEdinburgh Magazine acknowledges the cantos’ questioning <strong>of</strong> religion, and disagreeswith it, but nonetheless validates its usefulness: “Who can deny, that that is valuablein a certain way which paints the prevailing sentiment <strong>of</strong> a large proportion <strong>of</strong> thepeople <strong>of</strong> any given age <strong>of</strong> the world?” Despite his disagreements with itsmetaphysical ontology, Lockhart defends Don Juan’s representative nature,acknowledging the prevalence <strong>of</strong> heterodoxy amongst “a large proportion <strong>of</strong> thepeople”. This acknowledgement is useful in the same way that William Roberts’comments on CHP are useful: as demonstrations <strong>of</strong> the heterogeneity <strong>of</strong> thecontemporary religious context, and thus the unrepresentative nature <strong>of</strong> theconservative religious views espoused by some. Going on to talk about Don Juan’salleged obscenity, Lockhart compares it with the ‘obscenity’ <strong>of</strong> Tom Jones and‘blasphemy’ <strong>of</strong> Voltaire, to declare,it is not within fifty miles <strong>of</strong> either <strong>of</strong> them: and as to obscenity, there is more<strong>of</strong> that in the pious Richardson’s pious Pamela, than all the novels and poemsthat have been written since. 135This is the argument which Byron had been making about Don Juan and Cain sincetheir inception. Interestingly, the reviewer uses “pious” as Byron does, including<strong>of</strong>ten within Don Juan, to mean ‘religious in appearance’, rather than ‘devoted inintention’, and thus the reviewer highlights hypocrisy and validates the poet’s attacksupon it. In the poem, the “pious reason /For making squares and streets anonymous”(13.26.201-2) is to conceal the identities <strong>of</strong> the perpetrators <strong>of</strong> scandalous acts, and, inregard to the slaughter at Ismail, the reader is alliteratively directed to “ponder what apious pastime war is” (8.124.992). Steel and lead, for blades and bullets, are “<strong>The</strong>134 Monthly Magazine, September 1823: pp.112, 113-14 (1705, 6-7). Identified as Campbell inGalignani Edition, p.778B.135 John Gibson Lockhart, Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine, XIV (September 1823), 282-93, RR, I,210-21: p.283 (211).83

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!