13.07.2015 Views

Icon - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

Icon - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

Icon - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

hundreds slily – for copies” (10.145, to Kinnaird 7/4/23). <strong>The</strong> clerk’s tale isconsistent with the Literary Chronicle’s description <strong>of</strong> the poem as “universally read,much admired, <strong>of</strong>ten abused”, 147 and with Campbell’s assertion that “scarcely anypoem <strong>of</strong> the present day has been more generally read”. 148 As with many <strong>of</strong> Byron’sother productions, the very popularity <strong>of</strong> the calumniated work demonstrated that thecritics’ proclaimed repugnance was not representative <strong>of</strong> the wider readership’sfeelings.None <strong>of</strong> this suggests that he was unaware <strong>of</strong> its deviation from moral propriety: in aletter to Augusta Leigh, he comments,I have also had a love letter from Pimlico from a lady whom I never saw in mylife – but who hath fallen in love with me for having written Don Juan! – Isuppose that she is either mad or nau[ghty]. (10.29, 7/11/22).That she must be mad or naughty to fall in love over Don Juan says that the poemmust diverge significantly from normal standards, but the poet did not considernormality to be equivalent with correctness, as is demonstrated by his frequentcommentary upon the disjunction between the normal appearance <strong>of</strong> social proprietyand the actual behaviours in which people engaged. <strong>The</strong> divergence <strong>of</strong> Don Juanfrom common social standards he did not consider to be dangerous, immoral, orunpopular, to judge by his comment to Kinnaird regarding Don Juan’s legal status, hisdeclaration that Little and Rousseau are more corrupting, and his preference for a juryover the Lord Chancellor:I am not at all clear that the poem is not a Copyright – at least all but the tw<strong>of</strong>irst cantos – it is not sedition – it is not blasphemy – if Murray chooses to trythe question before a jury with the former cantos – I will with the present ones.[…] it is useless to go to the Chancellor – better to a Jury at once. (10.98, toKinnaird 12/2/23).147 Literary Chronicle, August 11, 1821, 495-7; August 11, 1821, 514-6, RR, III, 1297-1302: p.495(1297).148 Monthly Magazine, September 1823, p.112 (1705).90

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!