13.07.2015 Views

Icon - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

Icon - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

Icon - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

tell!” (11.77.609-10). <strong>The</strong> punchline which puts “Carotid-artery-cutting Castlereagh”(10.59.468) in Hell leaves open the inference by analogy that Napoleon is in Heavenand that there is a God to know this.<strong>The</strong> text is reinforcing, not challenging, the stereotypical belief position in thatparticular regard, whilst challenging the certainty <strong>of</strong> mortal knowledge about theseissues: non-specific theism is implicitly affirmed, and this is coherent with the poem’spreviously-discussed representation <strong>of</strong> the post-mortem existence <strong>of</strong> the soul, butmore specific formulations <strong>of</strong> belief are left undetermined by the criticism <strong>of</strong> theirepistemology.Another expression <strong>of</strong> agnosis is joined with an attack on cant. <strong>The</strong> first part is theplayfully sceptical one, not attacking religion, but gently questioning it. This beginswith the description <strong>of</strong> “this unriddled wonder, /<strong>The</strong> World, which at the worst’s aglorious blunder” (11.3.23-4), declaring the self-evident truth that the world is notunderstood by us, and moving on to a positive valuation which at the very leastimplies theism, since a blunder can only be made by an agent. This is furtherunderlined by the beginning <strong>of</strong> the next stanza, which identifies the theistic position <strong>of</strong>the Bible as better than the vagaries <strong>of</strong> pure randomness, and then proceeds into aconsideration <strong>of</strong> religious disputation:If it be Chance; or if it be accordingTo the Old Text, still better: – lest it shouldTurn out so, we’ll say nothing against the wording,As several people think such hazards rude:<strong>The</strong>y’re right; our days are too brief for affordingSpace to dispute what no one ever couldDecide, and every body one day willKnow very clearly – or at least lie still. (11.4.25-4.32).136

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!