A G E N D A 1. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE Ian Metcalfe 2 ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

KT asked whether there was any evidence of a wider appreciationof the issues with emergency activity among healthcare partnersin community. HL confirmed there were lots of discussions andthat there had been progress and they were working to allowdirect access to the out of hours GP service without anappointment by the end of May. She added that the Trust was stillworking with local GPs to increase their presence in ED Minors inaddition to ED Majors and also to ensure assessments for patientswith ongoing health and social care needs are carried outside ofthe hospital as more efficient.TS added that The King’s Fund had been commissioned toidentify the priorities locally and one of the recommendations waslikely to be that the acute trusts should manage communityhospitals in order to better align the incentives to move patientsout of an acute care setting into a more appropriate one.IM asked whether the performance issues with the 18 weekreferral to treatment targets were likely to continue while activitylevels remained high. HL replied that the Trust had prepared atrajectory for recovery and a capacity plan in order to achievecompliance in a clinically sustainable way between May andOctober in all specialities. She added that some breaches weredue to cancellations and complex pathways.(b) Financial Performance (Appendix F)SH presented the paper, noting that the year-end results weresubject to external audit. He reported that:• EBITDA had fallen due to a reduction in non-operatingexpenditure and a non recurrent increase in operatingexpenditure, the first related to the reduced capitalprogramme and a revaluation of the Trust’s asset base bythe District Valuer and the latter to the initial planning anddesign fees in relation to Christchurch Hospital;• the Trust had met the transformation plan for 2012/13 buthe expressed caution on the outlook for the coming year inparticular in the context of non-recurrent savings.He concluded that the 2012/13 performance had been excellentand there were no concerns relating to any Directorate.JS requested whether additional information on staff vacancylevels could be provided in the report to highlight areas wherevacancy levels were high. SH confirmed that the reporting relatedto unfilled clinical vacancies only and reported at an aggregatelevel across the Trust.SHBOD/Part 1MINS 10.05.13 PAGE 8 OF 16
(c)Stroke Performance (Presentation)Damian Jenkinson, Joseph Kwan and Clare Gordon joined themeeting.DJ commented that the concern shown by the Board and theCouncil of Governors both pleased and troubled him as heappreciated the priority and focus on the performance of theStroke Unit but was aware at the same time that the performancehad created some anxiety.DJ delivered his presentation, explaining that:• the targets for Stroke performance were measures of theprocess of care rather than clinical outcomes but it hadbeen demonstrated that the quality of the process waslinked to good outcomes;• patients’ survival and their ability to live independently washeavily influenced by their condition prior to their stroke;• 100% of patients should be directly admitted to the StrokeUnit and the recent dip in the Trust’s performance and themore recent recovery in performance;• the aspiration for 80% of patients to spend 90% of their stayon the Stroke Unit;• there was a pattern in terms of annual performance and theactions which had been taken had led to an improvementequating to a smaller dip in performance in 2012/13 thanthe previous year;• other performance measures relating to brain imaging andthrombolysis were provided with support from Radiologyand the Trust’s performance was close to the nationalaverage;• the introduction of a weekend service for TIA as it wasimportant to act quickly and prevent strokes in thesepatient;• both he and JK had worked weekends and this wasdelivering an excellent service, with imaging within 20minutes and the results within 25 minutes, although due tocoding issues they did not have data available yet;• the excellent, high quality service provided through EarlySupported Discharge (ESD) work which supported patientsoutside Hospital where they recover better;• the Stroke Unit was looking to expand the communityservice for patients who did not qualify for ESD due to theirmore complex needs;• the reduction in the number of beds when the Stroke Unitwas opened was due to the reduction in delays relating totransfer to Christchurch Hospital, ESD and increasedconsultant ward rounds and the Department of Health’sasset tool had been used to support these calculationswhich were still correct (although a different mix of bedsBOD/Part 1MINS 10.05.13 PAGE 9 OF 16
Page 1 and 2: A meeting of the Board of Directors
Page 3 and 4: THE ROYAL BOURNEMOUTH AND CHRISTCHU
Page 5 and 6: In response to a question from KT a
Page 7 and 8: how this was being rolled out throu
Page 9: still challenged at times;• that
Page 13 and 14: • nurse staffing was already bein
Page 15 and 16: (b) Informatics Strategy (Appendix
Page 17 and 18: (b)Monitor’s Guidance for NHS Pro
Page 19 and 20: THE ROYAL BOURNEMOUTH AND CHRISTCHU
Page 21 and 22: BOARD OF DIRECTORSMeeting Date and
Page 23 and 24: Quality Impact Assessments 2013/14T
Page 26 and 27: Example of completed QIATransformat
Page 28 and 29: Board of Directors Part 114th June
Page 30 and 31: Board of Directors Part 114th June
Page 32 and 33: Area Indicator Measure Target Monit
Page 34 and 35: Trust Performance Dashboard - Quali
Page 36 and 37: Board of DirectorsJune 2013Financia
Page 38 and 39: Board of DirectorsJune 20138. Recom
Page 40 and 41: BOARD OF DIRECTORSMeeting Date and
Page 42 and 43: Board of Directors Part 114 June 20
Page 60 and 61:
Board of Directors Part 114 June 20
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
EnforcementGuidance28 March 2013Mon
Page 84 and 85:
ForewordThe Health and Social Care
Page 86 and 87:
1 IntroductionThe Health and Social
Page 88 and 89:
Table 1.1 Monitor’s enforcement p
Page 90 and 91:
Licence enforcementDiscretionary re
Page 92 and 93:
Competition lawMonitor has concurre
Page 94 and 95:
2 PrioritisationThis chapter sets o
Page 96 and 97:
We also recognise that the actions
Page 98 and 99:
3 Imposing discretionary requiremen
Page 100 and 101:
SeriousnessMonitor will take into a
Page 102 and 103:
Deterring similar breaches by other
Page 104 and 105:
An important objective of imposing
Page 106 and 107:
4 Enforcement - case procedures4.1
Page 108 and 109:
provide regular case updates to par
Page 110 and 111:
including in the application eviden
Page 112 and 113:
In certain circumstances, Monitor m
Page 114 and 115:
Non-compliance penaltiesUnder sched
Page 116 and 117:
Notice of Intent (section 90)Where
Page 118 and 119:
• any incidental or consequential
Page 120 and 121:
Monitor will have concurrent powers
Page 122 and 123:
the first two decision-making point
Page 124 and 125:
Non-compliance penaltiesA provider
Page 126 and 127:
AnnexMonitor’s powers of enforcem
Page 128 and 129:
a) has provided, or is providing, a
Page 130 and 131:
c) the matters likely to be taken i
Page 132 and 133:
Monitor, 4 Matthew Parker Street, L
Page 134 and 135:
Board of Directors - Part I14 th Ju
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Board of Directors Part I14 th June
Page 144 and 145:
Board of Directors Part I14 th June
Page 146 and 147:
BOARD OF DIRECTORSMeeting Date and
Page 148 and 149:
Job DescriptionPOST TITLEREPORTS AN
Page 150 and 151:
MEDICAL LEADERSHIPAs Medical Direct
Page 152 and 153:
PERSON SPECIFICATIONQualifications:
Page 154 and 155:
CALDICOTT GUARDIAN ROLE DESCRIPTION
Page 156 and 157:
BOARD OF DIRECTORSMeeting Date and
Page 158 and 159:
Transporting sharps containersIn or
Page 160 and 161:
NHS Winter Heroes recognisedFour me
Page 162 and 163:
Leadership programmesSupported by N
Page 164 and 165:
Board of Directors - Part I14 June
Page 166 and 167:
Board of Directors - Part I14 June
Page 168 and 169:
DatePublicationTitleInformationPage
Page 170 and 171:
DatePublicationTitle3 May 2013www.s
Page 172 and 173:
May 2013 l 6
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
DatePublicationTitle13 May 2013www.
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Board of Directors Business Program
show all

A G E N D A 1. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE Ian Metcalfe 2 ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?