A G E N D A 1. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE Ian Metcalfe 2 ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

BOARD OF DIRECTORSMeeting Date and Part: 14 June 2013 Part 1Subject:Section:Proposed merger of The Royal Bournemouth andChristchurch Hospitals NHS FT and Poole Hospital NHS FTStrategyExecutive with OverallResponsibilityTony SpotswoodAuthor of Paper:Details of previousdiscussion and/ordissemination:Key Purpose:Tony SpotswoodOngoing discussions regarding the mergerPatient Safety Health & Safety Performance StrategyXXAction required by BoD:To note progressExecutive Summary:Strategic Goals &Objectives:Links to CQCRegistration: (Outcomereference)Links to AssuranceFramework/Key Risks:Type of Assurance:To update the Board on current work regarding the proposedmergerMaintaining local servicesQuality and SafetyQuality and SafetyInternalExternalX
Board of Directors Part 114 June 2013The proposed merger of The Royal Bournemouth and ChristchurchHospitals NHS FT and Poole Hospital NHS FTThe Trusts are due to hold second separate hearings with the CompetitionCommission on 11 June. These discussions will principally focus on the areas ofoverlap between the two organisations, the CC’s attempt to define our market, thecounterfactual, maternity services and the competitive effect on elective services.At this stage the emerging CC papers argue the Trusts provide a range of serviceswhich they do not. This is despite clear evidence to the contrary. It is cruciallyimportant that the lay panel are fully aware of this fact as otherwise the degree ofoverlap is overstated. This has emerged as a result of the CC seeking toreapportion patient activity attributed to general medicine and general surgery. Afull update on the hearing will be given at the Board meeting.Once concluded the Trusts expect to receive, by the end of June, the provisionalfindings of the Competition Commission. This will then generate a series ofdiscussions regarding potential remedies which the CC would see as an importantmeans of mitigating any perceived significant lessening of competition. From thework that has been undertaken to date the areas it is most concerned about relateto elective and maternity services.An important recent development has been an acknowledgement from Monitor thatin the absence of merger and financial support from the CCG, (which they are clearwill not be forthcoming), then Poole will face very significant financial pressures.The Competition Commission had previously argued that this was unlikely to impacton the future of the Trust; Monitor are, however, clear in view of recent informationprovided to them by Poole Hospital, that this will create significant pressure. TheCC will need to weigh this development very carefully in considering any potentiallessening of competition.Work continues now led by Mary Sherry to develop a more detailed set of plansunderpinning the likely savings to accrue as a result of the merger. It is importantthat all directorates are able to complete their Post Transaction Integration Plans(PTIPs) and detail savings/efficiencies that will be generated in 2014/15 and2015/16. The two Trusts are currently working to identify whether the savings aresufficient to maintain a balanced financial position for any new merged organisation.Monitor will want to be satisfied that the new organisation is financially viable. It ispossible that further discussions will be required with commissioners concerning theneed to provide transitional support for the new organisation. These discussionshave not yet taken place but will be important in helping maintain the financial healthof a new organisation. The Cost Improvement Plans of each directorate will bereviewed in detail on 1 and 2 July. This scrutiny is critical to ensure that we haverobust plans going forward and these will be independently tested through KPMGand Monitor’s assessment of the proposed organisation.Work will commence in the Autumn to determine the options to be put forward forconsultation with regard to the future configuration of a range services includingthose previously discussed. It is important for me to emphasise that no decisionshave been taken with regard to the future siting of services and both TMB and HEGProposed Merger Page 1 of 2Strategy
Page 1 and 2: A meeting of the Board of Directors
Page 3 and 4: THE ROYAL BOURNEMOUTH AND CHRISTCHU
Page 5 and 6: In response to a question from KT a
Page 7 and 8: how this was being rolled out throu
Page 9 and 10: still challenged at times;• that
Page 11 and 12: (c)Stroke Performance (Presentation
Page 13 and 14: • nurse staffing was already bein
Page 15 and 16: (b) Informatics Strategy (Appendix
Page 17 and 18: (b)Monitor’s Guidance for NHS Pro
Page 19 and 20: THE ROYAL BOURNEMOUTH AND CHRISTCHU
Page 21 and 22: BOARD OF DIRECTORSMeeting Date and
Page 23 and 24: Quality Impact Assessments 2013/14T
Page 26 and 27: Example of completed QIATransformat
Page 28 and 29: Board of Directors Part 114th June
Page 30 and 31: Board of Directors Part 114th June
Page 32 and 33: Area Indicator Measure Target Monit
Page 34 and 35: Trust Performance Dashboard - Quali
Page 36 and 37: Board of DirectorsJune 2013Financia
Page 38 and 39: Board of DirectorsJune 20138. Recom
Page 42 and 43: Board of Directors Part 114 June 20
Page 82 and 83: EnforcementGuidance28 March 2013Mon
Page 84 and 85: ForewordThe Health and Social Care
Page 86 and 87: 1 IntroductionThe Health and Social
Page 88 and 89: Table 1.1 Monitor’s enforcement p
Page 90 and 91:
Licence enforcementDiscretionary re
Page 92 and 93:
Competition lawMonitor has concurre
Page 94 and 95:
2 PrioritisationThis chapter sets o
Page 96 and 97:
We also recognise that the actions
Page 98 and 99:
3 Imposing discretionary requiremen
Page 100 and 101:
SeriousnessMonitor will take into a
Page 102 and 103:
Deterring similar breaches by other
Page 104 and 105:
An important objective of imposing
Page 106 and 107:
4 Enforcement - case procedures4.1
Page 108 and 109:
provide regular case updates to par
Page 110 and 111:
including in the application eviden
Page 112 and 113:
In certain circumstances, Monitor m
Page 114 and 115:
Non-compliance penaltiesUnder sched
Page 116 and 117:
Notice of Intent (section 90)Where
Page 118 and 119:
• any incidental or consequential
Page 120 and 121:
Monitor will have concurrent powers
Page 122 and 123:
the first two decision-making point
Page 124 and 125:
Non-compliance penaltiesA provider
Page 126 and 127:
AnnexMonitor’s powers of enforcem
Page 128 and 129:
a) has provided, or is providing, a
Page 130 and 131:
c) the matters likely to be taken i
Page 132 and 133:
Monitor, 4 Matthew Parker Street, L
Page 134 and 135:
Board of Directors - Part I14 th Ju
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Board of Directors Part I14 th June
Page 144 and 145:
Board of Directors Part I14 th June
Page 146 and 147:
BOARD OF DIRECTORSMeeting Date and
Page 148 and 149:
Job DescriptionPOST TITLEREPORTS AN
Page 150 and 151:
MEDICAL LEADERSHIPAs Medical Direct
Page 152 and 153:
PERSON SPECIFICATIONQualifications:
Page 154 and 155:
CALDICOTT GUARDIAN ROLE DESCRIPTION
Page 156 and 157:
BOARD OF DIRECTORSMeeting Date and
Page 158 and 159:
Transporting sharps containersIn or
Page 160 and 161:
NHS Winter Heroes recognisedFour me
Page 162 and 163:
Leadership programmesSupported by N
Page 164 and 165:
Board of Directors - Part I14 June
Page 166 and 167:
Board of Directors - Part I14 June
Page 168 and 169:
DatePublicationTitleInformationPage
Page 170 and 171:
DatePublicationTitle3 May 2013www.s
Page 172 and 173:
May 2013 l 6
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
DatePublicationTitle13 May 2013www.
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Board of Directors Business Program
show all

A G E N D A 1. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE Ian Metcalfe 2 ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?