A G E N D A 1. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE Ian Metcalfe 2 ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

provide greater details on the work which was being done arounddischarge planningGB asked about the impact on outcomes for patients who werenot able to be admitted to the Stroke Unit. DJ acknowledged thatlots had been written about this and had shown that Stroke Unitsimprove the clinical outcomes for patients when compared togeneral medical wards. He added that the data around ESD hadcompared outcomes to patients on a Stroke Unit rather thangeneral medical wards and this demonstrated further improvementin outcomes for patients with ESD with mild to moderate strokes.DJ added that there were tariffs associated with stroke servicesand best practice for admitting patients to a fully specified StrokeUnit for example there was an additional £0.33m payable for theweekend TIA service.JS requested that the Board be provided with more information onthe outcomes measures for the Stroke Unit which had beenreferred to in the discussion. She thanked DJ, JK and CG for thepresentation and noted how she had been encouraged by thenational position.JS acknowledged that the questions which had been submitted bythe Governors would be answered by a subsequent briefing. DJ,JK and CG left the meeting.HLHL55/13 STRATEGY(a)Proposed Merger between Poole Hospital and RBCH(Appendix G)TS reported on the visit to the Hospital from Dr Dan Poulter MPwhich had been arranged after Christopher Chope MP had raisedquestions about the merger in Parliament.He confirmed that the Council of Governors had received adetailed brief on the Competition Commission process followingthe hearing and that there would be a further hearing in June. Herelayed the Competition Commission’s latest thinking in relation towhich services may be affected by a substantial lessening ofcompetition following the merger, which indicated that non-electiveservices, private activity and community activity would not beaffected and there may be a risk of a substantial lessening ofcompetition for outpatients and some elective activity. He notedthat any discussion about remedies would be likely to last throughJuly and August, but it was difficult to gauge at this stage, and theTrusts continued to work towards licensing of the merged trust inApril 2014.BOD/Part 1MINS 10.05.13 PAGE 12 OF 16
(b) Informatics Strategy (Appendix H)PG presented the report describing how the Trust’s InformaticsStrategy was clinically driven and the Trust’s vision. He noted thatthe National Information Strategy published in 2012 recognisedthe paperless hospital for first time. He highlighted the objectivesand drivers of the strategy, including:• the aim for all patient information to be collectedelectronically to allow access for multiple users at any time;• maximising safety and clinical quality;• improving efficiency;• supporting clinical decision-making;• improving digital channels for communicating and deliveringcare to patients;• assisting in the delivery of recommendations in the FrancisReport relating to the electronic patient record (EPR) andelectronic escalation; and• improving the way various organisations involved in apatient’s health and social care worked together, giving theexample the EPR being available to ambulance staff andthe electrocardiogram from the ambulance being availableto the teams in the Hospital.He explained that there were 27 projects and six workstreamswhich included those elements that provided the foundation for thenew tools and the new tools themselves. He concluded that thefunding for the strategy had been approved in principle by theFinance Committee and that this would be reviewed at leastannually and it had also been approved by the Board of Directorsat Poole Hospital on 25 April.In response to a question from SP about the level of resiliencebuilt into the plan, PG replied that innovations were tracked verycarefully and the Trust could look at other countries who werefurther ahead that the UK from an Informatics perspective to gaingreater insight.BF and TS questioned the possible impact of any financialdifficulties at Poole Hospital NHS Foundation Trust on the fundingand delivery of the strategy. PG responded that the delivery of thestrategy was dependent on the capital but that projects could bephased differently if this was an issue and also that someelements of the strategy were dependent on both Trusts workingtogether at same time, giving the example of the scanning ofpaper records.PS noted that the strategy was impressive and demonstrated howInformatics could help improve some of the risks arounddocumentation which the Trust had identified previously andreferred to eNEWS. She asked whether PG had confidence thatBOD/Part 1MINS 10.05.13 PAGE 13 OF 16
Page 1 and 2: A meeting of the Board of Directors
Page 3 and 4: THE ROYAL BOURNEMOUTH AND CHRISTCHU
Page 5 and 6: In response to a question from KT a
Page 7 and 8: how this was being rolled out throu
Page 9 and 10: still challenged at times;• that
Page 11 and 12: (c)Stroke Performance (Presentation
Page 13: • nurse staffing was already bein
Page 17 and 18: (b)Monitor’s Guidance for NHS Pro
Page 19 and 20: THE ROYAL BOURNEMOUTH AND CHRISTCHU
Page 21 and 22: BOARD OF DIRECTORSMeeting Date and
Page 23 and 24: Quality Impact Assessments 2013/14T
Page 26 and 27: Example of completed QIATransformat
Page 28 and 29: Board of Directors Part 114th June
Page 30 and 31: Board of Directors Part 114th June
Page 32 and 33: Area Indicator Measure Target Monit
Page 34 and 35: Trust Performance Dashboard - Quali
Page 36 and 37: Board of DirectorsJune 2013Financia
Page 38 and 39: Board of DirectorsJune 20138. Recom
Page 40 and 41: BOARD OF DIRECTORSMeeting Date and
Page 42 and 43: Board of Directors Part 114 June 20
Page 64 and 65:
Board of Directors Part 114 June 20
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
EnforcementGuidance28 March 2013Mon
Page 84 and 85:
ForewordThe Health and Social Care
Page 86 and 87:
1 IntroductionThe Health and Social
Page 88 and 89:
Table 1.1 Monitor’s enforcement p
Page 90 and 91:
Licence enforcementDiscretionary re
Page 92 and 93:
Competition lawMonitor has concurre
Page 94 and 95:
2 PrioritisationThis chapter sets o
Page 96 and 97:
We also recognise that the actions
Page 98 and 99:
3 Imposing discretionary requiremen
Page 100 and 101:
SeriousnessMonitor will take into a
Page 102 and 103:
Deterring similar breaches by other
Page 104 and 105:
An important objective of imposing
Page 106 and 107:
4 Enforcement - case procedures4.1
Page 108 and 109:
provide regular case updates to par
Page 110 and 111:
including in the application eviden
Page 112 and 113:
In certain circumstances, Monitor m
Page 114 and 115:
Non-compliance penaltiesUnder sched
Page 116 and 117:
Notice of Intent (section 90)Where
Page 118 and 119:
• any incidental or consequential
Page 120 and 121:
Monitor will have concurrent powers
Page 122 and 123:
the first two decision-making point
Page 124 and 125:
Non-compliance penaltiesA provider
Page 126 and 127:
AnnexMonitor’s powers of enforcem
Page 128 and 129:
a) has provided, or is providing, a
Page 130 and 131:
c) the matters likely to be taken i
Page 132 and 133:
Monitor, 4 Matthew Parker Street, L
Page 134 and 135:
Board of Directors - Part I14 th Ju
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Board of Directors Part I14 th June
Page 144 and 145:
Board of Directors Part I14 th June
Page 146 and 147:
BOARD OF DIRECTORSMeeting Date and
Page 148 and 149:
Job DescriptionPOST TITLEREPORTS AN
Page 150 and 151:
MEDICAL LEADERSHIPAs Medical Direct
Page 152 and 153:
PERSON SPECIFICATIONQualifications:
Page 154 and 155:
CALDICOTT GUARDIAN ROLE DESCRIPTION
Page 156 and 157:
BOARD OF DIRECTORSMeeting Date and
Page 158 and 159:
Transporting sharps containersIn or
Page 160 and 161:
NHS Winter Heroes recognisedFour me
Page 162 and 163:
Leadership programmesSupported by N
Page 164 and 165:
Board of Directors - Part I14 June
Page 166 and 167:
Board of Directors - Part I14 June
Page 168 and 169:
DatePublicationTitleInformationPage
Page 170 and 171:
DatePublicationTitle3 May 2013www.s
Page 172 and 173:
May 2013 l 6
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
DatePublicationTitle13 May 2013www.
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Board of Directors Business Program
show all

A G E N D A 1. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE Ian Metcalfe 2 ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?