04.12.2012 Views

florida state university college of music performance practice

florida state university college of music performance practice

florida state university college of music performance practice

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

seem to have no bearing on formal design as evidenced by Rilling (1996), who for no<br />

known reason, uses piano in measures 72-81 and ends the movement in a forte dynamic.<br />

Three conductors used trills with discretion. Slowik (1989) added trills in the<br />

Soprano and Tenor vocal part on each top line F in measure eighty-eight. Likewise,<br />

Veldhoven (2004) added the trill in only the tenor part F in measure eighty-eight while<br />

Higginbottom (2001) made the decision for the Soprano part to trill on the D in measure<br />

eighty-nine. Other unique artistic decisions were made with Guttenberg (1991) who takes<br />

a break after the cadence from the previous recitative before starting the fugue <strong>state</strong>ment.<br />

Guttenberg (1991) and Beringer (1997) hold the final note <strong>of</strong> the chorus for an unusually<br />

longer time than their contemporaries. Lastly, Carrington (2006) inserts a fermata and<br />

holds the F major chord on the second half <strong>of</strong> beat one in measure 87, which clearly<br />

sectionalizes the last three measures.<br />

The fastest interpretation <strong>of</strong> this movement belongs to German conductor Max<br />

(1990) at 1:06 while Dutchman Koopman (1993) and German Noll (1997) were both<br />

timed at 1:09. All three <strong>of</strong> the slowest interpretations were German conductors.<br />

Guttenberg (1991) rendered the movement in 2:08 while Weyand (1990) and Beringer<br />

(1997) were timed at 1:32 and 1:27 respectively. The graphical analysis on this<br />

movement shows the recordings with a surprising amount <strong>of</strong> similar time durations, when<br />

one disregards momentarily Guttenberg‟s slowest movement.<br />

22 Durch dein Gefängnis, Gottes Sohn (Chorale)<br />

This chorale explains that Christ‟s physical bondage and imprisonment allows us<br />

to be spiritually free. 422 Dynamically, the majority <strong>of</strong> the conductors desired a s<strong>of</strong>ter<br />

dynamic to perform this chorale, but there were a few who performed it in a mezzo-forte<br />

while Rilling (1996) sang it in a healthy forte dynamic.<br />

Thirty-seven conductors observed every fermata written in this chorale. Only<br />

Guttenberg (1991) preferred a longer four-bar phrase by ignoring the first fermata in the<br />

beginning <strong>of</strong> the chorale. Most performed the fermatas with the tone and the choirs<br />

ending consonants occurring within one beat value. There were a few conductors who<br />

422 Roehrig, Helmut J. “The St. John Passion by J.S. Bach in the light <strong>of</strong> the Neue Bach-Ausgabe edition<br />

1973: a conductor‟s analysis in preparation for a <strong>performance</strong>.” PhD diss., Indiana University, 1981, 142.<br />

117

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!