04.12.2012 Views

florida state university college of music performance practice

florida state university college of music performance practice

florida state university college of music performance practice

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

given space with breath to enhance their poetic meaning. Yet overall the longer lines<br />

were performed in a legato manner. Rilling (1996) represents a few conductors who<br />

diverge in sections from legato to a more marcato feel. Case in point “die ich nun weiter<br />

nicht beweine,” (which I no longer bewail) was performed in such a marcato style. 438<br />

The tempo and duration <strong>of</strong> this movement demonstrate closer results as the twenty<br />

five years progressed. Guttenberg‟s (1991) recording shows an extreme fluctuation in<br />

tempo throughout the movement. One unique fact <strong>of</strong> this movmement is that this is one<br />

<strong>of</strong> the only movements where a German conductor is not represented in the top three<br />

fastest or slowest interpretations. Leusink (2001) from Holland was recorded as the<br />

fastest interpretation <strong>of</strong> this chorus at 6:01 followed by Austrian conductor Harnoncourt<br />

(1993) at 6:08. The third fastest recording <strong>of</strong> this movement is from English conductor<br />

Cleobury at 6:20. The top two slowest recordings come from Belgium conductors whose<br />

recordings are from the same year. Kuijken (1987) and Herreweghe (1987) were marked<br />

at 9:06 and 8:31 respectively. Swiss conductor Corboz (1994) was third slowest at 8:18.<br />

40 Ach Herr, laß dein lieb Engelein (Chorale)<br />

The final movement in the Passion is an E flat major chorale which prays for a<br />

“peaceful death and the resurrection <strong>of</strong> the body on the Last Day.” 439 Being the last<br />

movement, it is not surprising that for dramatic effect dynamics played a very important<br />

part in this chorale. Results from analyzing the thirty-eight recordings show great variety<br />

in the way conductors chose dynamics. Given the immeasurable possibilities that<br />

conductors chose for dynamic shadings in this chorale, only a few will be explored here.<br />

The choices conductors made regarding dynamics show a keen interest in imparting the<br />

text to the listener by having dynamics act in response to the text. Phrases were not only<br />

terraced dynamically, but recordings like Slowik (1989), Milnes (1996), Beringer (1997)<br />

and Daus (1999) demonstrated a gradual pacing <strong>of</strong> crescendi and decrescendi within<br />

particular phrases. While there were many subtle differences regarding dynamics, many<br />

had the same overall vision throughout this movement. The majority <strong>of</strong> conductors like<br />

Christophers (1989), Cleobury (1996), Rilling (1996), Dombrecht (1996), Fasolis (1998),<br />

438 Translations are from Dürr, Johann Sebastian Bach’s St. John Passion, 168-169.<br />

439 Roehrig, “The St. John Passion by J.S. Bach in the light <strong>of</strong> the Neue Bach-Ausgabe edition 1973,” 145.<br />

130

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!