04.12.2012 Views

florida state university college of music performance practice

florida state university college of music performance practice

florida state university college of music performance practice

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

the St. John Passion. While no one can argue that these works are indeed spectacular<br />

creations <strong>of</strong> art, what can be attributed as the bias against acknowledging the St. John<br />

Passion in the same class?<br />

First, unlike Bach‟s other large-scale works, the lack <strong>of</strong> one definitive version<br />

discouraged many conductors to program the work. Perhaps without the clarification <strong>of</strong><br />

one particular version gave the impression that the St. John Passion was an<br />

undistinguished work in Bach‟s corpus. Additionally, there are <strong>of</strong>ten two generalizations<br />

made when making decisions concerning a work‟s value. There is the assumption that<br />

works composed later in a composer‟s life are always more sophisticated than those<br />

composed early in the composer‟s career. Second, works that are compositionally longer<br />

are <strong>of</strong>ten judged as superior when compared to shorter counterparts. Despite its various<br />

versions, the core <strong>of</strong> St. John Passion, when compared to works such as the Mass in B<br />

minor and St. Matthew Passion, is both compositionally early in Bach‟s oeuvre as well as<br />

shorter in length. The three factors explored above could account for the many years in<br />

the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries that the St. John Passion suffered neglect.<br />

In the middle <strong>of</strong> the Twentieth Century, the fortune <strong>of</strong> the St. John Passion began<br />

to change. In addition to the two important 1950 recordings by conductors Grossman and<br />

Shaw, G. Schirmer published an edited vocal score <strong>of</strong> the St. John Passion in 1951. The<br />

vocal score included forty-three pages <strong>of</strong> introductory notes by <strong>music</strong>ologist Arthur<br />

Mendel. Mendel‟s unique and impressive foreword provided detailed information<br />

regarding the St. John Passion and <strong>performance</strong> <strong>practice</strong> suggestions on a myriad <strong>of</strong><br />

issues such as history and structure, performing forces, notational conventions, chorale<br />

fermatas and expressive devices such as dynamics, ornamentation and articulation. This<br />

introduction followed by Mendel‟s historic editing <strong>of</strong> the St. John Passion for the Neue<br />

Bach Ausgabe in 1973 distinguishes him as perhaps the one singular personality that<br />

transformed the work from obscurity to a recognition <strong>of</strong> its deserved esteem.<br />

However, it should be pointed out that while Mendel‟s work was indisputably<br />

important to the exposure and dissemination <strong>of</strong> the St. John Passion in the later half <strong>of</strong><br />

the twentieth century, the <strong>music</strong>al establishment‟s attitude and climate, as influenced by<br />

the early <strong>music</strong> movement had also changed. No longer did <strong>music</strong>ians subscribe entirely<br />

to the evolutionary position <strong>of</strong> <strong>music</strong>al works. The ideology <strong>of</strong> the evolutionary view is<br />

74

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!