04.12.2012 Views

florida state university college of music performance practice

florida state university college of music performance practice

florida state university college of music performance practice

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

in a lower key <strong>of</strong> D major; however, in Dürr‟s opinion this has not been conclusively<br />

determined. 255<br />

Other modifications Bach made in the second <strong>performance</strong> included the insertion<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Bass aria (movement 11+), “Himmel reiße, Welt erbebe” after the chorale<br />

(movement 11) “Wer hat dich so geschlagen,” and this aria is also believed to have its<br />

provenance in the Weimar period. Tenor aria (movement 13 II ) “Zerschmettert mich, ihr<br />

Felsen und ihr Hügel” replaced “Ach, mein Sinn” (movement 13 I ); Tenor aria (movement<br />

19 II ) “Ach windet euch nicht so, geplagte Seelen” replaced both Bass aria, “Betrachte,<br />

meine Seel” (movement 19) and Tenor aria, “Erwäge, wie sein blutgefärbter Rüucken<br />

(movement 20) from version 1. The seven-bar dramatic telling <strong>of</strong> the ripping <strong>of</strong> the<br />

temple veil in Movement 33 “Und siehe da, der Vorhang im Tempel zerriß” replaced its<br />

earlier version. Dürr suggests that this altering had textual implications in that the new<br />

text, Matthew 27: 51-52, flows better into the tenor arioso (movement 34), “Mein Herz,<br />

in dem ganze Welt” than the previous Mark 15: 38 text. 256<br />

The chorale chorus “Christe, du Lamm Gottes, (movement 40 II ) replaced the<br />

straightforward chorale in version 1, “Ach Herr, laß dein lieb Engelein” (movement<br />

40 I ). 257 This extensive chorale chorus was used previously in the cantata Du wahrer Gott<br />

und Davids Sohn (BWV 23) that served as Bach‟s audition piece for the Leipzig post.<br />

This prior use contributes to speculation that perhaps it was at some time part <strong>of</strong> another<br />

Passion from the Weimar period. 258 However, at this point this is mere speculation with<br />

no concrete evidence substantiating this idea.<br />

Several enigmas present themselves with the 1725 version. First, why did Bach<br />

feel compelled to produce a different version, with textual insertions that are more<br />

apocalyptic 259 in tone, <strong>of</strong> the St. John Passion? There are those who feel the additions <strong>of</strong><br />

the elaborate chorale choruses in version 2 corresponded with the 1724-1725 cantata<br />

cycle. Dürr cautions that while this could be the case, it must be remembered that for a<br />

Good Friday evensong, there would not have been a chorale sermon, for which the<br />

255<br />

Dürr, Johann Sebastian Bach’s St. John Passion, 5.<br />

256<br />

Ibid.<br />

257<br />

Ibid.<br />

258<br />

Ibid.<br />

259<br />

Daniel R. Melamed, “Bach‟s St. John Passion: Can We Really Still Hear the Work – and<br />

Which One?” in The World <strong>of</strong> Baroque Music, George B. Stauffer, ed. Bloomington: Indiana University<br />

Press, 2006, 235-252.<br />

53

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!