04.12.2012 Views

florida state university college of music performance practice

florida state university college of music performance practice

florida state university college of music performance practice

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

portrayals <strong>of</strong> Bach, not only since 2000, but also in the past quarter-<strong>of</strong>-a-century is<br />

symptomatic <strong>of</strong> a devaluing <strong>of</strong> the score or Werktrueue, <strong>of</strong>ten associated with modernist<br />

values, and more about the postmodern attraction to humanistic and restorative aspects <strong>of</strong><br />

art such as composer biographies. 203<br />

Scholar Christoph Wolff added to his already rich Bach résumé with a celebrated<br />

biographical portrait Bach: the Learned Musician. In a review, David Ledbetter suggests<br />

that Wolff‟s contribution that intensely focuses on the objective and scientific realm <strong>of</strong><br />

Bach‟s life accomplishments, is a celebrated conclusion to the objective twentieth century<br />

Sachlichkeit. 204 For Wolff, Bach is examined in the context <strong>of</strong> the scientific revolution<br />

sweeping Europe in the seventeenth century, and provides supporting evidence that he<br />

deserves recognition as one <strong>of</strong> the leading intellects <strong>of</strong> the world. Wolff‟s discourse is<br />

prompted by the quote <strong>of</strong> German poet and writer Christian Friedrich Daniel Schubart,<br />

“Was Newton als Weltweiser war, war Sebastian Bach als Tonkünstler” (what Newton<br />

was as philosopher, Sebastian Bach was as composer). 205<br />

Originally published in 2000 and then translated into English six years later,<br />

Martin Geck provides readers with a responsible, albeit less-celebrated, inquiry than the<br />

Wolff biography. Furthermore, in the year 2000 Andrew Parrott published The Essential<br />

Bach Choir, which served to answer critics‟ requests for a thorough encapsulation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

thesis first proposed by Rifkin and defended by Parrott and others <strong>of</strong> one-voice-per-part<br />

(commonly known as OVPP) singing <strong>of</strong> Bach‟s concerted works. Two years later, Rifkin<br />

responded himself with a shorter book, Bach’s Choral Ideal, which reexamines the<br />

legendary Entwurff. Since the disturbance that ensued over a quarter-<strong>of</strong>-a-century ago<br />

concerning Rifkin‟s revolutionary idea <strong>of</strong> Bach‟s choir, many people have been<br />

persuaded by his case. No one to date has presented compelling evidence to dismiss<br />

203 John Butt, “The Postmodern Mindset, Musicology and the Future <strong>of</strong> Bach Scholarship,” Understanding<br />

Bach 1 (2006) 12. (Accessed 8 January 2008), <br />

204 David Ledbetter, “Wolff‟s Bach,” Early Music 29.1 (February 2001): 128.<br />

205 Christoph Wolff, Johann Sebastian Bach: The Learned Musician, (New York: W.W. Norton and<br />

Company, 2000),1. Wolff has used this quote to develop additional studies concerning Bach‟s self-image as<br />

well as his thoughts concerning <strong>music</strong> <strong>of</strong> the seventeenth century. See Christoph Wolff, “Bach‟s Music and<br />

Newtonian Science: A Composer in Search <strong>of</strong> the Foundations <strong>of</strong> His Art,” Understanding Bach 2 95-106,<br />

Christoph Wolff, “Defining Genius: Early Reflections <strong>of</strong> J.S. Bach‟s Self-Image,” Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the<br />

American Philosophical Society 145.4 (December 2001) 474, Christoph Wolff, “Images <strong>of</strong> Bach in the<br />

Perspective <strong>of</strong> Basic Research and Interpretative Scholarship,” The Journal <strong>of</strong> Musicology 22.4 (Fall 2005),<br />

511, Christoph Wolff, “J.S.Bach and the legacy <strong>of</strong> the seventeenth century,” in Bach Studies 2, Daniel R.<br />

Melamed, editor (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), 200.<br />

42

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!