04.12.2012 Views

florida state university college of music performance practice

florida state university college of music performance practice

florida state university college of music performance practice

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

parts as the “B” parts in his Kritischer Bericht. 235 The next reference to the St. John is<br />

found in the inventory catalogue <strong>of</strong> the Berliner Singakademie compiled by S.W. Dehn<br />

prior to 1854. 236 It is highly likely they were in the library <strong>of</strong> the Berliner Singakademie<br />

long before 1854 because on May 15, 1815 Carl Friedrich Zelter began rehearsing the St.<br />

John Passion with the Singakademie. 237 In 1854-55, the Berlin Royal Library acquired<br />

the parts and now today they are kept at the Berliner Staatsbibliothek. 238<br />

It is important enough to point out that to untangle the quagmire <strong>of</strong> the various<br />

parts, autograph corrections, insertions, deletions, restorations <strong>of</strong> previously deleted parts<br />

involved in the multiple versions <strong>of</strong> the St. John Passion much is owed to the<br />

indispensable work <strong>of</strong> Arthur Mendel‟s editing <strong>of</strong> the St. John Passion for the Neue<br />

Bach-Ausgabe. Prior to this, there was the edited score in the Bachgesellschaft by<br />

Wilhelm Rust who relied heavily on the haphazard chronology developed by Philipp<br />

Spitta. 239<br />

Between the publishing <strong>of</strong> the two editions only one additional part has been<br />

discovered, identified as Peter/Pilate, B19 z in the Neue Bach Ausgabe, that now only<br />

exists in photostatic form due to the original copy being lost in the events during or after<br />

World War II. 240 Mendel‟s conclusions concerning the various extant manuscript sources<br />

<strong>of</strong> the St. John Passion are drastically different from Spitta and Rust. The crux for<br />

Mendel‟s research lies in the evidence presented by Dürr and Dadeslon that<br />

revolutionized the chronology <strong>of</strong> Bach‟s works, which cast doubt on the previous datings<br />

<strong>of</strong> the surviving sources <strong>of</strong> the St. John Passion as well as the evidence left by the<br />

sources.<br />

Mendel‟s research highlights that most <strong>of</strong> the surviving parts predate the only<br />

extant original score, which in areas shows Bach‟s own handwriting as well as other<br />

copyists. There is also the thorny issue that there are discrepancies between the surviving<br />

score and parts. The original score is usually referred to as either Source A or Score<br />

235 Helmut J. Roehrig, “The St. John Passion by J.S. Bach in the light <strong>of</strong> the Neue Bach-Ausgabe edition<br />

1973: a conductor‟s analysis in preparation for a <strong>performance</strong>.” PhD diss., Indiana University, 1981, 5.<br />

236 Ibid.<br />

237 Ibid.<br />

238 Ibid.<br />

239 Ibid.<br />

240 Ibid.<br />

50

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!