16.07.2015 Views

review of literature on clinical pancreatology - The Pancreapedia

review of literature on clinical pancreatology - The Pancreapedia

review of literature on clinical pancreatology - The Pancreapedia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

patients with a proven exocrine pancreatic insufficiency [290].Functi<strong>on</strong> in diabetes mellitusRecently it has been shown that there is not <strong>on</strong>ly endocrine insufficiency in diabetic patients,but a frequent co-morbidity <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> both, the endocrine and exocrine pancreas. <strong>The</strong> records <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>1992 patients with diabetes mellitus who had been treated in <strong>on</strong>e hospital during a 2-yearperiod were re-evaluated. Defined parameters were documented in standardized datasheets. Records were further checked for the results <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> imaging procedures <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the pancreas.In 307 patients fecal elastase-1 c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s had been performed and documented. Onlythese patients were included in further evaluati<strong>on</strong>. Fecal elastase-1 c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s wereinversely correlated with diabetes durati<strong>on</strong> and HbA1c-levels but not with age. C-peptidelevels correlated positively with fecal elastase-1 c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s. BMI and fecal elastase-1c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s were also significantly correlated. <strong>The</strong>re was no correlati<strong>on</strong> between diabetestherapy and exocrine pancreatic functi<strong>on</strong> as there was no correlati<strong>on</strong> with any c<strong>on</strong>comitantmedicati<strong>on</strong>. <strong>The</strong> presence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> diabetes-associated antibodies was not related to fecalelastase-1 c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s. According to the documented data 38 were classified as type-1diabetes (12 %), 167 as type-2 (54 %), and 88 patients met the diagnostic criteria <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> type-3(29 %). Fourteen patients could not be classified because <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> lacking informati<strong>on</strong> (5 %). <strong>The</strong>authors c<strong>on</strong>cluded that exocrine insufficiency might be explained as a complicati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>diabetes mellitus. However, it is more likely that type-3 diabetes is much more frequent thanpreviously believed. C<strong>on</strong>sequently the evaluati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> exocrine functi<strong>on</strong> and morphologyshould be included into the <strong>clinical</strong> workup <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> any diabetic patient at least at the time <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>manifestati<strong>on</strong> [291].Pancreas divisumTo assess the l<strong>on</strong>g-term outcomes <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> endoscopic minor papilla therapy in a spectrum <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>symptomatic patients with pancreas divisum. Patients with pancreas divisum coded in aprospective database as having had minor papilla endotherapy (1997- 2003, n=145) weregrouped into 3 categories: (1) acute recurrent pancreatitis, (2) chr<strong>on</strong>ic pancreatitis, and (3)chr<strong>on</strong>ic/recurrent epigastric pain. Teleph<strong>on</strong>e follow-up was c<strong>on</strong>ducted (78 % <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> patients),including quesi<strong>on</strong>s regarding interval co-interventi<strong>on</strong>s and narcotic use. Primary success wasdefined as <strong>clinical</strong> improvement (better or cured <strong>on</strong> a Likert scale), without needing narcotics,after <strong>on</strong>e therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Primary successrates in acute recurrent pancreatitis, chr<strong>on</strong>ic pancreatitis, and chr<strong>on</strong>ic/recurrent epigastricpain were achieved in 53 percentage, 18 percent, and 41 percent, respectively; andsec<strong>on</strong>dary success rates (< 2 additi<strong>on</strong>al endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographies),71 percent, 46 percent, and 55 percent, respectively (median follow-up, 43m<strong>on</strong>ths; range, 14-116 m<strong>on</strong>ths). Younger age (median age, 47 years [no success] vs 58years [success]) and chr<strong>on</strong>ic pancreatitis (odds ratio, 0.10; 95 % c<strong>on</strong>fidence interval 0.03 to0.39) independently predicted a lower chance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> success. It was c<strong>on</strong>cluded that significantl<strong>on</strong>g-term improvement can be achieved with endoscopic therapy in selected patients withpancreas divisum, although many require multiple procedures. Older patients, withoutchr<strong>on</strong>ic pancreatitis, were most likely to resp<strong>on</strong>d [292].Pancreatic stellate cellsPancreatitis and pancreatic cancer represent two major diseases <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the exocrine pancreas.Pancreatitis exhibits both acute and chr<strong>on</strong>ic manifestati<strong>on</strong>s. <strong>The</strong> comm<strong>on</strong>est causes <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> acutepancreatitis are gallst<strong>on</strong>es and alcohol abuse; the latter is also the predominant cause <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>chr<strong>on</strong>ic pancreatitis. Recent evidence indicates that endotoxinemia, which occurs in

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!