16.07.2015 Views

review of literature on clinical pancreatology - The Pancreapedia

review of literature on clinical pancreatology - The Pancreapedia

review of literature on clinical pancreatology - The Pancreapedia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

patients for operati<strong>on</strong> and when counseling patients about operative risk, but they do notpreclude obese individuals from undergoing definitive pancreatic operati<strong>on</strong>s [458].To examine the influence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> obesity, as measured by body mass index (BMI) <strong>on</strong>clinicopathologic factors and survival after pancreatectomy to treat adenocarcinoma aretrospective <str<strong>on</strong>g>review</str<strong>on</strong>g> and statistical analysis using prospectively collected data wasperformed. Two hundred eighty-five c<strong>on</strong>secutive patients with data available for BMIcalculati<strong>on</strong> who underwent potentially curative pancreas resecti<strong>on</strong> to treat adenocarcinomafrom 1999 to 2006. It was identified a subset <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> obese patients (BMI >35) who were at 12-foldrisk <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> lymph node metastasis compared with n<strong>on</strong>obese patients (BMI < 35). <strong>The</strong> estimateddisease-free and overall survival rates were decreased in the obese patients, and the risk <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>cancer recurrence and death after pancreatectomy was nearly twice that in n<strong>on</strong>obesepatients. It was c<strong>on</strong>cluded that obese patients with a BMI <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> more than 35 are more likely tohave node-positive pancreatic cancer and decreased survival after surgical resecti<strong>on</strong>. Datasuggest that the negative influence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> BMI <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> more than 35 <strong>on</strong> cancer-related end points isunrelated to the potential complexity <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> performing major <strong>on</strong>cologic surgery in obese patients[459].Diabetes in pancreatic cancerIn Korea, the prevalence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> pancreatic cancer (PC) in general populati<strong>on</strong> has been reportedas 7 in 100,000. However, that in diabetes mellitus (DM) has not been elucidated yet. Onestudy was designed to estimate the prevalence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> PC am<strong>on</strong>g diabetes mellitus patients, andcharacterize and compare the patients with diabetes mellitus with and without PC. 5,082patients (4,890 diabetes mellitus without PC, 78 PC with diabetes mellitus, and 114 PCwithout diabetes mellitus) were enrolled during a period <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 4 years between 2004 and 2008.<strong>The</strong> prevalence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> PC in diabetes mellitus patients was 1.6 percent and that <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> diabetesmellitus in PC patients was 41 percent. No significant differences in the <strong>clinical</strong>characteristics except HbAIc and ALP were observed between PC patients with diabetesmellitus and without diabetes mellitus. Am<strong>on</strong>g 78 PC patients with diabetes mellitus, diabetesmellitus was diagnosed in 19 (29 %) and 29 (37 %) patients c<strong>on</strong>comitantly or within 2 yearsprior to the diagnosis <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> PC, respectively. Am<strong>on</strong>g the cases with recent <strong>on</strong>set diabetesmellitus (less than 2 years durati<strong>on</strong>), the disease durati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> diabetes mellitus before thediagnosis <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> PC was less than 1 year in 14 patients (18 %) and 1 to 2 years in 15 patients(19 %). Diabetes mellitus patients with PC were found to have significantly higher ALT, totalbilirubin, and ALP levels than in diabetes mellitus patients without PC. It was c<strong>on</strong>cluded thatthe prevalence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> pancreatic cancer in diabetes mellitus patients was 1.6 percent and washigher than in the general populati<strong>on</strong>. Recent <strong>on</strong>set diabetes mellitus was frequent in PCpatients (less than 2 years durati<strong>on</strong>) [460].Coeliac axis stenosisPatients with celiac axis stenosis are asymptomatic due to the rich collateral blood supplythrough superior mesenteric artery. However, ligating and dividing gastroduodenal arteryduring pancreatoduodenectomy can cause ischemic threat especially to liver, less frequentlystomach and spleen, or failure <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> anastomoses. It was presented a case <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 27-year-oldfemale who underwent duodenopancreatectomy for pseudopapillary tumor <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the head <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>pancreas. Celiac axis stenosis was found peroperatively and proven during angiography.Although an attempt <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> endovascular dilatati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> celiac axis was unsuccessful, blood supplyto the liver was sufficient and therefore it was not performed any other interventi<strong>on</strong> toimprove blood flow to the liver. Postoperative course was uneventful. Celiac axis stenosiscan be caused by tumor infiltrati<strong>on</strong> or lymphadenopathy in malignant disease,atherosclerosis or compressi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the median arcuate ligament. <strong>The</strong> stenosis can be

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!