16.07.2015 Views

review of literature on clinical pancreatology - The Pancreapedia

review of literature on clinical pancreatology - The Pancreapedia

review of literature on clinical pancreatology - The Pancreapedia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography 170 patients were enrolled andrandomized to two groups: a study group (n=85) who received 300 mg <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> oral allopurinol at15 h and 3 h before endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and a c<strong>on</strong>trolgroup (n=85) receiving an oral placebo at the same times. Main Outcome Measurementsincluded serum amylase levels and the number severity <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the episodes <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> pancreatitis.Serum amylase levels were classified as normal (< 150 IU/L) or hyperamylasemia (> 151IU/L). Episodes <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> pancreatitis were classified following Rans<strong>on</strong>'s criteria and CT severityindex. Distributi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> benign pathology was similar between groups. Hyperamylasemia wasmore comm<strong>on</strong> in the c<strong>on</strong>trol group. Mild pancreatitis developed in two patients from the studygroup (2.3 %) and eight (9.4 %) from c<strong>on</strong>trol group, which was a significant difference; sevenepisodes were observed in high-risk patients <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the c<strong>on</strong>trol group (25 %) and <strong>on</strong>e in theallopurinol group (3 %). Significant risk factors for post-procedure pancreatitis were precutsphincterotomy, pancreatic duct manipulati<strong>on</strong>, and multiple procedures. <strong>The</strong>re were nodeaths or side effects. It was c<strong>on</strong>cluded that allopurinol before ERCP decreased theincidences <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> hyperamylasemia and pancreatitis in patients submitted to high-risk procedures[211].Sprayed epinephrine as prophylaxisEpinephrine sprayed <strong>on</strong> the papilla may reduce papillary edema and thus prevent acutepancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). <strong>The</strong> aim <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong>estudy was to determine the efficacy <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this technique for preventi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> post- ERCPpancreatitis. It was randomized the patients to have 10 ml <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> either 0.02 percent epinephrine(epinephrine group) or saline (c<strong>on</strong>trol group) sprayed <strong>on</strong> the papilla after diagnostic ERCPand prospectively analyzed the occurrence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> post-ERCP pancreatitis between the groups.<strong>The</strong>re was no significant difference between the groups with regard to visualizati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the bileduct and/or the main and accessory pancreatic ducts, presence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> pancreatic acinarizati<strong>on</strong>,number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> injecti<strong>on</strong>s into the pancreatic duct, total volume <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>trast used, and proceduredurati<strong>on</strong>. Overall, post-ERCP pancreatitis occurred in 4 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the 370 patients (1 %). <strong>The</strong>incidence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> pancreatitis tended to be higher in the c<strong>on</strong>trol group (4/185) than in theepinephrine group (0/185), but this was not a statistically significant difference. Furtherstudies <strong>on</strong> the efficacy <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this technique in patients at high risk for pancreatitis, and <strong>on</strong> othervolumes and/or c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> epinephrine, are warranted [212].Interleukin-10 as prophylaxisPancreatitis is the most comm<strong>on</strong> major complicati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> endoscopic retrogradecholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Inflammatory cytokines are released during acutepancreatitis. Interleukin-10 (IL-10) is a potent inhibitor <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> cytokines and has been shown toattenuate pancreatitis in animal models and pilot human studies. One study aimed todetermine whether prophylactic IL-10 administrati<strong>on</strong> reduces the frequency or severity <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>post-ERCP pancreatitis in high-risk patients. A randomized, multicenter, double-blind,placebo-c<strong>on</strong>trolled study was c<strong>on</strong>ducted. Patients received IL-10 at a dose <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> either 8 or 20microg/kg or placebo as a single intravenous injecti<strong>on</strong> 15 to 30 minutes before ERCP.Standardized criteria were used to diagnose and grade the severity <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> postprocedurepancreatitis. A total <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 305 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the planned total enrollment <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 948 patients were randomized.<strong>The</strong>re was a 15, 22, and 14 percent incidence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> post-ERCP pancreatitis in the IL-10 (8microg/kg), IL-10 (20 microg/kg), and placebo treatment groups, respectively. Due toapparent lack <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> efficacy, the study was terminated at an interim analysis [213].Antibiotics as prophylaxisIt was determined the prophylactic effect <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> antibiotics <strong>on</strong> post-endoscopic retrogradecholangiopancreatography (ERCP) cholangitis or sepsis reducti<strong>on</strong> in randomized c<strong>on</strong>trolledtrials. Databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Science Citati<strong>on</strong>Index updated to June 2007 were searched. Main outcome measure was post-ERCPcholangitis or sepsis. Seven trials were identified, and a total <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1389 patients were included;post-ERCP cholangitis occurred in 5.8 percent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>trols (41/705) versus 3.4 percent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!