16.07.2015 Views

review of literature on clinical pancreatology - The Pancreapedia

review of literature on clinical pancreatology - The Pancreapedia

review of literature on clinical pancreatology - The Pancreapedia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

evaluati<strong>on</strong>. <strong>The</strong> purpose <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> these diagnostic tests is to distinguish benign from malignantcysts <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the pancreas. Accordingly, it is imperative to distinguish pancreatic pseudocystsfrom their mimics. In <strong>on</strong>e study, the authors explored the cytomorphologic features <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>pseudocyst <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the pancreas and evaluated the role <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Alcian blue and mucicarmine stains inthe cytologic evaluati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> pancreatic cysts. Forty-two patients were identified who had aneventual diagnosis <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> pancreatic pseudocyst and had an endoscopic ultrasound-guided fineneedleaspirate available. Clinical and imaging findings and chemical analyses <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> cyst fluidwere recorded. <strong>The</strong> cytologic preparati<strong>on</strong>s were evaluated for gastrointestinal c<strong>on</strong>taminati<strong>on</strong>,inflammatory cells, mucin, and pigmented material. <strong>The</strong> cytomorphologic features <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 110neoplastic mucinous cysts (intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasms/mucinous cysticneoplasms <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the pancreas) were evaluated and compared with the pseudocysts. <strong>The</strong>majority <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> patients (95 %) had a prior episode <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> pancreatitis. On imaging, the pseudocystswere unilocular (92 %). In 69 percent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> cases, the endos<strong>on</strong>ographic diagnosis was that <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> apseudocyst. <strong>The</strong> mean carcinoembry<strong>on</strong>ic antigen level was 41 ng/mL. In c<strong>on</strong>trast, thecytopathologist rendered a definitive diagnosis <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> pseudocyst in <strong>on</strong>ly 10 percent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> cases.<strong>The</strong> majority <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> smears (75 %) revealed neutrophils and/or histiocytes. Atypical epithelialclusters were identified in 3 cases, 1 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> which was diagnosed as suspicious for carcinoma.Yellow pigmented material, which was identified in 13 pseudocysts (31 %), was not observedin neoplastic mucinous cysts. Alcian blue- and mucicarmine-positive material was identifiedin 64 and 40 percent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> pseudocysts, respectively, and in 57 and 38 percent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> neoplasticmucinous cysts, respectively. It was c<strong>on</strong>cluded that the cytologic features frequently weren<strong>on</strong>specific. <strong>The</strong> presence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> yellow pigmented material served as a surrogate marker <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> apseudocyst. Special stains for mucin did not distinguish pseudocysts from neoplasticmucinous cysts [644].To retrospectively evaluate the sensitivity and specificity <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> several morphologic findings thatmay be seen with cystic pancreatic lesi<strong>on</strong>s, in the diagnosis <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> pseudocyst at magneticres<strong>on</strong>ance (MR) imaging from 2005 to 2007, electr<strong>on</strong>ic radiology and pathology databaseswere searched to identify patients with pancreatic cystic neoplasms or pseudocysts whounderwent pancreatic MR imaging. Twenty-two patients with cystic pancreatic neoplasmsthat were c<strong>on</strong>firmed at surgical resecti<strong>on</strong> (n=12) or endoscopic ultras<strong>on</strong>ography with cysticfluid analysis (n=10) were identified. Of 20 patients with pancreatic pseudocysts, seven hadpseudocysts that were identified at pathologic resecti<strong>on</strong> and 13 had a <strong>clinical</strong> history <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>pancreatitis, with initial computed tomography revealing no pancreatic cyst and subsequentfollow-up MR imaging depicting cystic lesi<strong>on</strong>s. Two abdominal radiologists independently andrandomly evaluated each case for presence or absence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> septa and internal dependentdebris and for external cyst morphology <strong>on</strong> axial and cor<strong>on</strong>al T2-weighted images and threedimensi<strong>on</strong>algradient-echo T1-weighted images obtained before and after intravenousc<strong>on</strong>trast agent administrati<strong>on</strong>. Logistic regressi<strong>on</strong> for correlated data was used to assess theusefulness <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> internal debris, external morphology, and septa for differentiating cysticneoplasms from pseudocysts. <strong>The</strong> readers' assessments <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the presence or absence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>cystic debris were c<strong>on</strong>cordant for 40 (95 %) <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the 42 patients, with a kappa coefficient <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>0.889, which indicated nearly perfect agreement. Thirteen (93 %) <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 14 lesi<strong>on</strong>s found to havedebris by either or both readers were pseudocysts, and <strong>on</strong>ly <strong>on</strong>e (4 %) <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the 22 cysticneoplasms had debris. Both readers were more likely to identify septa within cysticneoplasms than within pseudocysts; however, the difference was not significant for eitherreader. <strong>The</strong> readers were more likely to observe microlobulated morphology in cysticneoplasms than in pseudocysts, with the difference between these lesi<strong>on</strong> types, in terms <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>prevalence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> microlobulated morphology, exhibiting a trend toward-but not reachingstatisticalsignificance. It was c<strong>on</strong>cluded that the presence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> internal dependent debrisappears to be a highly specific MR finding for the diagnosis <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> pancreatic pseudocyst [645].EUSEndoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is useful for the treatment <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> sterile pancreatic fluid collecti<strong>on</strong>s(PFC), either by means <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> transmural drainage or by complete aspirati<strong>on</strong>. <strong>The</strong> aim <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong>e

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!