16.07.2015 Views

review of literature on clinical pancreatology - The Pancreapedia

review of literature on clinical pancreatology - The Pancreapedia

review of literature on clinical pancreatology - The Pancreapedia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PANCREATIC HISTORYEarly c<strong>on</strong>ceptsPancreatic anatomy<strong>The</strong> earliest observati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> the pancreas were probably made by rabbis in the Babyl<strong>on</strong>ianTalmud who refer to a "finger <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the liver" [001]. <strong>The</strong> initial anatomical descripti<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> thepancreas are generally c<strong>on</strong>sidered to have originated from the Alexandrians Herophilus,Erasistratos, and Eudemus in the third century BC [002, 003]. Although Galen provided amodest anatomical descripti<strong>on</strong>, neither he, Hippocrates, Erasistratus, nor Herophilus wereable to identify any relati<strong>on</strong>ship to disease. <strong>The</strong>se ancient quasi anatomophysiologistsregarded the pancreas as unusual, given that it had no cartilage or b<strong>on</strong>e. This observati<strong>on</strong>led Ruphos <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Ephesus (c. 100 BC) to name the organ "pancreas" (Greek pan: all, + kreas:flesh or meat) [004, 005].Andreas Vesalius (1513-1564) referred to the pancreas in the fifth book <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> his opus (Dehumani corporis fabrica) as a "glandulous organ or kannelly body <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> substance growing in theneather pannicle <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the caule (omentum)" and postulated that the pancreas exerts aprotective effect <strong>on</strong> the stomach by serving as a cushi<strong>on</strong> (Schutzorgan) <strong>on</strong> which it rested[006].In 1642, in an anatomical dissecti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> an executed criminal, Johann Wirsüng (1589-1643)described the main pancreatic duct, but neither he nor his c<strong>on</strong>temporaries could decipher thefuncti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the gland [007]. Giovanni Domenico Santorini (1681-1737) is credited with thediscovery <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the accessory pancreatic duct, although several other c<strong>on</strong>temporary anatomistsalso reported <strong>on</strong> the existence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the accessory duct [008].In 1720, Abraham Vater (1684-1751) presented his descripti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the duodenal ampulla[008], whereas Ruggero Oddi, as a fourth year medical student in 1887, dem<strong>on</strong>strated theexistence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the sphincter, which bears his name [009]. <strong>The</strong> dubious history <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this sphincteris recapitulated in Oddi's precipitous fall from scientific grace and his ignominious demise asa member <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the French Foreign legi<strong>on</strong> in an unknown grave in Tunisia [010].Pancreatic physiologyDespite knowledge <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the existence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the pancreas, there was little effort to investigate thephysiological role <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the gland until the late 17th century when Franciscus de le Boe Sylvius(1614-1672) <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Amsterdam proposed that digesti<strong>on</strong> was a multistep process starting withfermentati<strong>on</strong> by saliva in the mouth and the stomach, a sec<strong>on</strong>d phase involving thepancreas, followed by the passage <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> chyle into lymphatics, the venous system, andeventually, the right side <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the heart [011]. His pupil, Regnier de Graaf (1641-1673),ingeniously developed a method for the direct investigati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the nature <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> pancreatic juiceby creating canine pancreatic fistulae through which he inserted feather quills into thepancreatic ductal orifices to obtain succus pancreaticus [012]. However, his investigati<strong>on</strong>sinto the nature <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the succus pancreaticus resulted in his err<strong>on</strong>eous c<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong> that it wasacidic in nature (he had sampled the pyloric antra <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> his piscine models) [010].<strong>The</strong>se innovative theories <strong>on</strong> digesti<strong>on</strong> were subsequently modified by John C<strong>on</strong>rad Brunner(1653-1727) whose experiments in pancreatectomized dogs led him to propose thatspecialized duodenal glands (which are named after him) were the major source <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> digestivejuice secreti<strong>on</strong> and that the pancreas was not vital either for digesti<strong>on</strong> or for life [002, 013]. In1682, Peyer described the lymphatic nodules located in the walls <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the ileum and proposedthat both Brunner glands and his own "patches" were adjuncts to digesti<strong>on</strong>, producing a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!