16.07.2015 Views

review of literature on clinical pancreatology - The Pancreapedia

review of literature on clinical pancreatology - The Pancreapedia

review of literature on clinical pancreatology - The Pancreapedia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

mass (n=121) or lymph node (n=101). <strong>The</strong> classificati<strong>on</strong> as benign or malignant, based <strong>on</strong>the real time elastography pattern, was compared with the classificati<strong>on</strong> based <strong>on</strong> the B-mode EUS images and with the final diagnosis obtained by EUS-guided fine needleaspirati<strong>on</strong> (EUS-FNA) and/or by surgical pathology. An interobserver study was performed.<strong>The</strong> sensitivity and specificity <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> EUS elastography to differentiate benign from malignantpancreatic lesi<strong>on</strong>s are 92 and 80 percent, respectively, compared to 92 percent and 69percent, respectively, for the c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>al B-mode images. <strong>The</strong> sensitivity and specificity <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>EUS elastography to differentiate benign from malignant lymph nodes was 92 percent and 83percent, respectively, compared to 79 percent and 50 percent, respectively, for the B-modeimages. <strong>The</strong> kappa coefficient was 0.785 for the pancreatic masses and 0.657 for the lymphnodes. EUS elastography is superior compared to c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>al B-mode imaging andappears to be able to distinguish benign from malignant pancreatic masses and lymph nodeswith a high sensitivity, specificity and accuracy. It might be reserved as a sec<strong>on</strong>d lineexaminati<strong>on</strong> to help characterise pancreatic masses after negative EUS-FNA and mightincrease the yield <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> EUS-FNA for lymph nodes [443].MetabolomicsObesity is a worldwide epidemic and a significant risk factor for pancreatic diseases includingpancreatitis and pancreatic cancer; the mechanisms underlying this associati<strong>on</strong> areunknown. Metabolomics is a powerful new analytical approach for describing themetabolome (compliment <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> small molecules) <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> cells, tissue or bi<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>luids at any given time.<strong>The</strong> aim was now to analyze pancreatic fat c<strong>on</strong>tent in lean and c<strong>on</strong>genitally obese miceusing both metabolomic analysis and c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>al chromatography. <strong>The</strong> pancreatic fatc<strong>on</strong>tent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 12 lean (C57BL/6J), 12 obese leptin-deficient (Lep ob ) and 12 obesehyperleptinemic (Lep db ) mice was evaluated by metabolomic analysis, thin-layer and gaschromatography. Pancreata <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>genitally obese mice had significantly more totalpancreatic fat, triglycerides and free fatty acids, but significantly less phospholipids andcholesterol than those <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> lean mice. Metabolomic analysis showed excellent correlati<strong>on</strong> withthin-layer and gas chromatography in measuring total fat, triglycerides and phospholipids.Differences in pancreatic fat c<strong>on</strong>tent and character may have important implicati<strong>on</strong>s whenc<strong>on</strong>sidering the local pancreatic proinflammatory milieu in obesity. Metabolomic analysis is avalid, powerful tool with which to further define the mechanisms by which fat impactspancreatic disease [444].Optical markersPancreatic cancer screening has been hampered by the high rate <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> complicati<strong>on</strong>sassociated with interrogating the pancreas. <strong>The</strong> closest n<strong>on</strong>-invasively accessible mucosaavailable for pancreatic cancer screening is the periampullary duodenal tissue. An earlierreport has shown the potential <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> using optical markers to interrogate this tissue for thepresence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> pancreatic cancer. In <strong>on</strong>e study, it was reported a larger data set <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> lowcoherenceenhanced backscattering (LEBS) and elastic light scattering fingerprinting (ELF)optical markers from the periampullary duodenal mucosa. Optical measurements from biopsysamples were acquired from a total <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 203 patients with varying <strong>clinical</strong> classificati<strong>on</strong>including healthy c<strong>on</strong>trols, a family history <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> pancreatic cancer, pancreatitis, mucinous cysticprecursor lesi<strong>on</strong>s, pancreatic cancer, and other pancreatic malignancies. Evaluati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> theperformance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> an independent testing set for discriminating healthy c<strong>on</strong>trol patients frompancreatic cancer patients showed a 95 percent sensitivity, 71 percent specificity, and 85percent area under the receiver operator characteristic (AUROC) curve. Importantly, thisperformance was uncompromised for detecting potentially curable stages <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the disease.Additi<strong>on</strong>ally, optical markers in higher risk populati<strong>on</strong>s such as family history and pancreatitishad values between those <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> healthy c<strong>on</strong>trol and pancreatic cancer patients, thus allowing forfuture investigati<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> screening from these high risk groups [445].

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!