review of literature on clinical pancreatology - The Pancreapedia
review of literature on clinical pancreatology - The Pancreapedia
review of literature on clinical pancreatology - The Pancreapedia
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
mass (n=121) or lymph node (n=101). <strong>The</strong> classificati<strong>on</strong> as benign or malignant, based <strong>on</strong>the real time elastography pattern, was compared with the classificati<strong>on</strong> based <strong>on</strong> the B-mode EUS images and with the final diagnosis obtained by EUS-guided fine needleaspirati<strong>on</strong> (EUS-FNA) and/or by surgical pathology. An interobserver study was performed.<strong>The</strong> sensitivity and specificity <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> EUS elastography to differentiate benign from malignantpancreatic lesi<strong>on</strong>s are 92 and 80 percent, respectively, compared to 92 percent and 69percent, respectively, for the c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>al B-mode images. <strong>The</strong> sensitivity and specificity <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>EUS elastography to differentiate benign from malignant lymph nodes was 92 percent and 83percent, respectively, compared to 79 percent and 50 percent, respectively, for the B-modeimages. <strong>The</strong> kappa coefficient was 0.785 for the pancreatic masses and 0.657 for the lymphnodes. EUS elastography is superior compared to c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>al B-mode imaging andappears to be able to distinguish benign from malignant pancreatic masses and lymph nodeswith a high sensitivity, specificity and accuracy. It might be reserved as a sec<strong>on</strong>d lineexaminati<strong>on</strong> to help characterise pancreatic masses after negative EUS-FNA and mightincrease the yield <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> EUS-FNA for lymph nodes [443].MetabolomicsObesity is a worldwide epidemic and a significant risk factor for pancreatic diseases includingpancreatitis and pancreatic cancer; the mechanisms underlying this associati<strong>on</strong> areunknown. Metabolomics is a powerful new analytical approach for describing themetabolome (compliment <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> small molecules) <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> cells, tissue or bi<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>luids at any given time.<strong>The</strong> aim was now to analyze pancreatic fat c<strong>on</strong>tent in lean and c<strong>on</strong>genitally obese miceusing both metabolomic analysis and c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>al chromatography. <strong>The</strong> pancreatic fatc<strong>on</strong>tent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 12 lean (C57BL/6J), 12 obese leptin-deficient (Lep ob ) and 12 obesehyperleptinemic (Lep db ) mice was evaluated by metabolomic analysis, thin-layer and gaschromatography. Pancreata <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>genitally obese mice had significantly more totalpancreatic fat, triglycerides and free fatty acids, but significantly less phospholipids andcholesterol than those <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> lean mice. Metabolomic analysis showed excellent correlati<strong>on</strong> withthin-layer and gas chromatography in measuring total fat, triglycerides and phospholipids.Differences in pancreatic fat c<strong>on</strong>tent and character may have important implicati<strong>on</strong>s whenc<strong>on</strong>sidering the local pancreatic proinflammatory milieu in obesity. Metabolomic analysis is avalid, powerful tool with which to further define the mechanisms by which fat impactspancreatic disease [444].Optical markersPancreatic cancer screening has been hampered by the high rate <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> complicati<strong>on</strong>sassociated with interrogating the pancreas. <strong>The</strong> closest n<strong>on</strong>-invasively accessible mucosaavailable for pancreatic cancer screening is the periampullary duodenal tissue. An earlierreport has shown the potential <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> using optical markers to interrogate this tissue for thepresence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> pancreatic cancer. In <strong>on</strong>e study, it was reported a larger data set <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> lowcoherenceenhanced backscattering (LEBS) and elastic light scattering fingerprinting (ELF)optical markers from the periampullary duodenal mucosa. Optical measurements from biopsysamples were acquired from a total <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 203 patients with varying <strong>clinical</strong> classificati<strong>on</strong>including healthy c<strong>on</strong>trols, a family history <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> pancreatic cancer, pancreatitis, mucinous cysticprecursor lesi<strong>on</strong>s, pancreatic cancer, and other pancreatic malignancies. Evaluati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> theperformance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> an independent testing set for discriminating healthy c<strong>on</strong>trol patients frompancreatic cancer patients showed a 95 percent sensitivity, 71 percent specificity, and 85percent area under the receiver operator characteristic (AUROC) curve. Importantly, thisperformance was uncompromised for detecting potentially curable stages <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the disease.Additi<strong>on</strong>ally, optical markers in higher risk populati<strong>on</strong>s such as family history and pancreatitishad values between those <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> healthy c<strong>on</strong>trol and pancreatic cancer patients, thus allowing forfuture investigati<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> screening from these high risk groups [445].