16.07.2015 Views

review of literature on clinical pancreatology - The Pancreapedia

review of literature on clinical pancreatology - The Pancreapedia

review of literature on clinical pancreatology - The Pancreapedia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

carcinogen exposure with cancer risk. <strong>The</strong> results from these epidemiologic studies wereevaluated and summarized in this <str<strong>on</strong>g>review</str<strong>on</strong>g>. <strong>The</strong> majority <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> these studies have shown that highintake <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> well-d<strong>on</strong>e meat and high exposure to meat carcinogens, particularly HCAs, mayincrease the risk <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> human cancer [338].SmokingCigarette smoking doubles the risk <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> pancreatic cancer, and smoking accounts for 20 to 25percent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> pancreatic cancers. <strong>The</strong> recent sequencing <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the pancreatic cancer genomeprovides an unprecedented opportunity to identify mutati<strong>on</strong>al patterns associated withsmoking. It was previously sequenced >750 milli<strong>on</strong> bp DNA from 23,219 transcripts in 24adenocarcinomas <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the pancreas (discovery screen). In this previous study, the 39 genesthat were mutated more than <strong>on</strong>ce in the discovery screen were sequenced in an additi<strong>on</strong>al90 adenocarcinomas <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the pancreas (validati<strong>on</strong> screen). Now, it was compared the somaticmutati<strong>on</strong>s in the cancers obtained from individuals who ever smoked cigarettes (n=64) to thesomatic mutati<strong>on</strong>s in the cancers obtained from individuals who never smoked cigarettes(n=50). When adjusted for age and gender, analyses <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the discovery screen revealedsignificantly more n<strong>on</strong>syn<strong>on</strong>ymous mutati<strong>on</strong>s in the carcinomas obtained from ever smokers(mean, 53 mutati<strong>on</strong>s per tumor) than in the carcinomas obtained from never smokers (mean,38.5). <strong>The</strong> difference between smokers and n<strong>on</strong>smokers was not driven by mutati<strong>on</strong>s inknown driver genes in pancreatic cancer (KRAS, TP53, CDKN2A/p16, and SMAD4), butinstead was predominantly observed in genes mutated at lower frequency. No differenceswere observed in mutati<strong>on</strong>s in carcinomas from the head versus tail <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the gland. Pancreaticcarcinomas from cigarette smokers harbor more mutati<strong>on</strong>s than do carcinomas from neversmokers [339].A meta-analysis <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> observati<strong>on</strong>al studies <strong>on</strong> associati<strong>on</strong> between cigarette smoking andpancreatic cancer was performed to focus, particularly, <strong>on</strong> the role <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the studies' quality inaffecting meta-analysis results. A bibliographic search was carried out <strong>on</strong> PubMed andEMBASE databases until February 15, 2008. Key words were "pancreatic neoplasms,""pancreatic cancer," "smoking," "smoke," "cigarette," "case-c<strong>on</strong>trol studies," and "cohortstudies." Studies about cigarette smoking and pancreatic cancer were selected andassessed <strong>on</strong> quality. Six cohort studies and 24 case-c<strong>on</strong>trol studies were selected, withmedian quality scores <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 8 (range, 3) and 10 (range, 8), respectively. Pooled case-c<strong>on</strong>trolstudies' odds ratio (OR) and cohort studies' risk ratio were, respectively, 1.45 (95 %c<strong>on</strong>fidence interval 1.33 to 1.57) and 1.78 (95% CI, 1.64-1.92). After stratifying for qualityscoring, high-quality-scored case-c<strong>on</strong>trol studies yielded an odds ratio <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1.38 (95 %c<strong>on</strong>fidence interval 1.27 to 1.49), whereas the others gave an odds ratio <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1.52 (95 %c<strong>on</strong>fidence interval 1.34 to 1.73). <strong>The</strong> results <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> meta-analysis for cohort studies showed arisk ratio <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1.74 (95 % c<strong>on</strong>fidence interval 1.61 to 1.90) and <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2.10 (95 % c<strong>on</strong>fidenceinterval 1.64 to 2.67), respectively, for high- and low-quality score studies. It was thusc<strong>on</strong>cluded that here is evidence that cigarette smoking is an important risk factor forpancreatic cancer, but the estimate <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the associati<strong>on</strong> greatly relies <strong>on</strong> the studies' quality[340].To evaluate the effects <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> nicotine and cigarette smoke exposure <strong>on</strong> mice submitted to 7,12-dimethylbenzanthracene (DMBA) model <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> pancreatic carcinogenesis. One hundred fourteenmale mice were divided into the DMBA-n and DMBA-s groups: the DMBA-n group was given2 mg/kg per dose <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> nicotine subcutaneously for 45 days, and the DMBA-s group wasexposed to 100 mg/m 3 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> cigarette smoke. At day 16, 1 mg <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> DMBA crystals was implantedin the pancreatic head <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> both groups. Euthanasia was performed in all mice 30 days afterthe surgery. <strong>The</strong> specimens were evaluated according to the following criteria: normal ducts,reactive hyperplasia, pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasm 3 (PanIN-3), and carcinoma. <strong>The</strong>frequency <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> PanIN in the 3 groups was almost the same when c<strong>on</strong>sidering the higher-grade

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!