16.07.2015 Views

review of literature on clinical pancreatology - The Pancreapedia

review of literature on clinical pancreatology - The Pancreapedia

review of literature on clinical pancreatology - The Pancreapedia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Precut at sphincterotomyPrecut is performed when biliary access at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP) fails. Precut may have adjunctive risks, but some authors have suggested that theattempts to cannulate the papilla that precede precutting cause complicati<strong>on</strong>s. It wastherefore evaluated the role <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the timing <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> precut in determining the development <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>complicati<strong>on</strong>s and with respect to the other factors involved. During ERCP, after 10 min <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>attempts to cannulate, patients were randomized to an early-precut group (n=77) undergoingprecut immediately or a late-access group (n=74) in which cannulati<strong>on</strong> was attempted for 10further minutes before the endoscopist was free to perform precut or to persist incannulati<strong>on</strong>. Occurrence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> complicati<strong>on</strong>s and the associated risk factors were recorded. <strong>The</strong>two groups were similar for general characteristics. <strong>The</strong> number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> attempts to cannulate, thenumber <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> pancreas injecti<strong>on</strong>s, and the incidence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> acinarizati<strong>on</strong> were higher in the lateaccessgroup. <strong>The</strong> cannulati<strong>on</strong> rate was 94 percent. <strong>The</strong> incidence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> overall complicati<strong>on</strong>swas similar, but the pancreatitis rate was higher in the late-access group (14.9 vs 2.6 %).Amylase levels increased by 399 + 879 in the early-precut group and 834 + 1478 in the lateaccessgroup, which was a significant difference. N<strong>on</strong>dilated bile duct and pancreaticinjecti<strong>on</strong> were related to the development <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> pancreatitis, whereas the performance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> precutwas related to other complicati<strong>on</strong>s. <strong>The</strong> authors c<strong>on</strong>cluded that early precut is associatedwith lower pancreatitis rate, suggesting that pancreatitis develops as a c<strong>on</strong>sequence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> theattempts to cannulate the papilla and pancreatic injecti<strong>on</strong>, and not pre-cutting [200].ERCP in severe biliary pancreatitisPrevious studies have included <strong>on</strong>ly a relatively small number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> patients with predictedsevere acute biliary pancreatitis in most studies. It was now again investigated the <strong>clinical</strong>effects <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> early ERCP in these patients in a prospective, observati<strong>on</strong>al multicenter study in 8university medical centers and 7 major teaching hospitals. One hundred fifty-three patientswith predicted severe acute biliary pancreatitis without cholangitis were enrolled in arandomized multicenter trial <strong>on</strong> probiotic prophylaxis in acute pancreatitis and wereprospectively followed. C<strong>on</strong>servative treatment or ERCP within 72 hours after symptom<strong>on</strong>set (at discreti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the treating physician) were compared for complicati<strong>on</strong>s and mortality.Patients without and with cholestasis (bilirubin: >2.3 mg/dL and/or dilated comm<strong>on</strong> bile duct)were analyzed separately. Of the 153 patients, 81 (53 %) underwent ERCP and 72 (47 %)c<strong>on</strong>servative treatment. Groups were highly comparable at baseline. Seventy-eight patients(51 %) had cholestasis. In patients with cholestasis, ERCP (52/78 patients: 67 %), ascompared with c<strong>on</strong>servative treatment, was associated with significantly fewer complicati<strong>on</strong>s(25 % vs 54 %). This included significantly fewer patients with >30 percent pancreaticnecrosis (8 % vs 31 %). Mortality was n<strong>on</strong>significantly lower after ERCP (6 % vs 15 %). Inpatients without cholestasis, ERCP (29/75 patients: 39 %) was not associated with reducedcomplicati<strong>on</strong>s (45 % vs 41 %) or mortality (14 % vs 17 %). It was c<strong>on</strong>cluded that early ERCPis associated with fewer complicati<strong>on</strong>s in predicted severe acute biliary pancreatitis ifcholestasis is present [201].Value <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> EUSWhen c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>al ERCP methods fail because <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> periampullary or ductal obstructi<strong>on</strong>, EUSguidedcholangiopancreatography (EUS-CP) may aid in pancreaticobiliary access.C<strong>on</strong>secutive patients undergoing EUS-CP were prospectively identified. <strong>The</strong>se patients hadunderg<strong>on</strong>e failed attempt(s) at therapeutic ERCP. Technical success was decompressi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>the duct <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> interest. Clinical success was resoluti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> jaundice or at least a 50 percentreducti<strong>on</strong> in pain or narcotics, as applicable. Between 2003 and 2007, EUS-CP wasattempted in 20 patients (11 men, 9 women age 58 years). Indicati<strong>on</strong>s included jaundice(n=8), biliary st<strong>on</strong>es (n=3), chr<strong>on</strong>ic pancreatitis (n=6), acute pancreatitis (n=2), and papillarystenosis (n=1). Reas<strong>on</strong>s for failed ERCP included periampullary mass (n=8), intradiverticularpapillae (n=4), and pancreatic duct stricture (n=7) or st<strong>on</strong>e (n=1). Technical success wasachieved in 18 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 20 patients (90 %). Biliary decompressi<strong>on</strong> was obtained in 11 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 12 patients(92 %) (7 transpapillary and 4 transenteric-transcholedochal). Pancreatic decompressi<strong>on</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!