Many more explanations however related to morecontrollable concerns such as building design andattributed the damage to lax building conventions indeveloping countries. Channel 5’s ‘5 Facts’, for example,said that building regulations, less strict than those indeveloped countries, had been responsible for the highdeath toll:Graphic: 200 a year this size or biggerReporter: Most of them are not near built-up areas. Oneearthquake in Peru left 70,000 people dead and 600,000homeless.Graphic: 70,000 killed in Peru in 1970Reporter: The death toll is higher in developing countriesbecause regulations aren’t so strict, this latest earthquakewouldn’t have claimed as many victims if it hadhappened in California for example.Graphic: Building regulations important (29.1.99Channel 5 1900-1930)Simon Gillan, a UK Rescue Worker interviewed onboth BBC1 and BBC2 on 28 January, related thedevastation to the ‘mixed building materials’ used indeveloping countries:Simon Gillan, UK Rescue Worker: I was reallysurprised, it was absolutely horrendous. I mean they havegot all sorts of mixed building materials here, somebuildings are standing, other buildings are like what’sstanding behind me, sort of shanty type buildings, thatjust collapsed totally. (BBC1 1800-1830; 28.1.99 BBC22230-2320)By and large, these appear as short one-off statementsin the flow of extended accounts of devastation which arenot taken up by the reporter’s dialogue that encase them.Only BBC2 featured an in-depth report on the scale ofthe damage and its future prevention. Juxtaposed againstappeals by the Colombian government for internationalaid, BBC2 looked at recent earthquakes in Afghanistan,Turkey and China and asked ‘how close is science togiving a way of saving human life?’ The newscaster states:Newscaster: Earthquakes are acts of God, they cannotbe prevented. But if there was some way of gettingreasonable warning, then at least buildings could beevacuated and lives saved...In Japan, the government hasbeen spending around £100 million a year on researchinto earthquake prediction. At this center they keep a 24-hour watch for potential pressure points. But, despitedecades of effort, neither they nor anyone else canmanage more than broad, brash ideas on when, where orif the earth might quake again.... The uncomfortabletruth is that disasters like the one which hit Cobai in 1995,still happen, 4,500 people killed, 100,000 homesdestroyed and a repair bill of $100 billion.The newscaster concludes, ‘prediction would beinevitable, but the chances of it happening are slim’:Newscaster: There are just too many variables, we needto know the location of a potential hit, in terms of itslongitude, latitude and depth, the month, day and timeand the expected magnitude of the quake.With this, the report turns from prediction to thedevastating effects of earthquakes and how this can bemodified. This ultimately concerns building materials.The report interviews a geo-seismic engineer:Zygmunt Lubkowski, Geo-seismic engineer, OveArup & Partners: If we design to modern codes ofpractice and we ensure that buildings, bridges etc areconstructed properly, then we can prevent the sort of lossof life which has been observed in Colombia.Newscaster: Using computer simulations, the engineerscan design and build bridges and buildings to withstandeven very strong earthquakes.The report goes on to look at how a ‘lack ofeducation, money and engineering expertise...allowssuch devastation:Richard Hughes, Building Conventor: Education isobviously a high priority because in most areas acommunity will experience an earthquake once in ageneration, or every few generations and therefore it’simportant to keep the message alive that people are livingin a seismic area and should be aware of it. So, they shouldknow what to do when an earthquake occurs and theyshould know what to do to maintain their houses.The newscaster follows this up with descriptions ofthe ‘frightening’ effects of earthquakes and how ‘victims’need an ‘even chance of surviving them.’ But with this thereport ends; there is no discussion of the ‘repair bill of$100 billion’ for Cobai in 1995 and how Colombia, adeveloping country could afford this, let alone theexpensive building modifications specified, which wouldbe costly.Channel 4 does report that the looting has created a‘security crisis’ that even Colombia, ‘one of the mostviolent countries on earth has never seen before’, that itis ‘a country that’s been racked for so long by civil war’,and that ‘the state of Colombia is in no shape, itsinfrastructure, its political hierarchy...to deal with adisaster like this.’ However nowhere in the news coverageare there attempts to contextualise accounts of disasterwithin the politics of the country. There is no discussion58 DFID – July 2000
of the violence and civil war which has torn Colombia for40 years and how the civil crisis caused by the earthquakecould destabilise the political status quo or affectparamilitary groups who have been fighting a guerrillawar for 35 years. According to newspapers at the time,some of these had used the drama of the earthquake totheir own advantage, to distract attention from theiractivities. For example:As the world’s attention is focused on the Colombianearthquake, the country’s paramilitary death squadshave taken advantage of the distraction provided by thecatastrophe to step up their activities. Fears are growingfor the safety of four Colombian human rights workersabducted by a paramilitary group on Thursday in thecity of Medellin, known as the center of the country’sdrugs trade...The paramilitary death squads are believedto be financed by Colombia’s drugs traffickers and tooperate with the consent of the Colombian army. Theysay they have a mission to combat Colombia’s left-wingguerrillas, but they are accused by human rights groupsof conducting a campaign of terror against the civilianpopulation that has driven hundreds of thousands ofColombians from their homes in the past five years... Lastweek’s abduction is a major embarrassment forColombia’s president, Andreas Pastrana, who has beentrying to open peace talks with the main guerrilla armiesin Colombia, but who has been widely criticized forfailing to curb the death squad activities. The mainguerrilla army, the FARC, has demanded thedismantling of the paramilitary groups as a condition ofany peace negotiations and they accuse the Colombianarmy of supporting paramilitary activities. (TheIndependent on Sunday 31.1.99)The earthquake struck a region in Central WesternColombia, previously vulnerable to earthquakes. In1995, for example, The Financial Times reported howPereira suffered an earthquake and that throughout theregion many of the buildings that collapsed were thosere-built after the last disaster (The Financial Times26.1.99). There were only eight references to the longtermreconstruction of the country. On several occasionsthroughout the news coverage, Humberto De La Calle,the Colombian Ambassador is featured calling for aidand long term financial assistance, but these commentsare not pursued by the text which follows. Repeatedly,the discussion flows back to short term solutions ofcharitable giving and medical aid.There are one-off statements by reporters on rebuilding,for example on ITN we hear ‘they can rebuildagain but the task is overwhelming’ (29.1.99 ITN 1230-1330) and on BBC1:Reporter: It will take years for Akindo Province torecover from a disaster which struck a nation in themiddle of a government-directed austerity drive. (BBC12100-2130)There is no discussion of what this term actuallyrefers to, or how it relates to the report that precedes it,which deals with ‘outbreaks of looting by armed gangs.’We are told that ‘the town of Kodova, the poorest in thiscoffee-growing region, was at the epicentre of theearthquake,’ that:Reporter: Usually, these soldiers would be fighting theprivate armies and drug lords who’ve made Colombia theworld’s kingdom of cocaine.......Outbreaks of looting arestill going on. Hunger is the motivation for most of thesedesperate people. The authorities are clamping down witharmed police and soldiers deployed and a curfew orderedfor yet another night in the largest towns. Because of abottleneck in distribution, the president of Colombia hascome to the region to command and cajole, but there’swidespread public cynicism that even in this instance ofdisaster, local political bosses will rise above the corruptionthat plagues their country. (BBC1 2100-2130)There is no discussion of the impact of theearthquake on Colombia’s ‘coffee growing region.’Nowhere is it said for example, that coffee is the mainexport and that Armenia produces 50% of the country’sannual coffee harvest. The way in which damage on thisscale affects the lives of ordinary people beyond theimmediate civil disorder and looting, how homes andlivelihoods may have to be rebuilt at their own expense,without government assistance, is not discussed. Neitherare the long term economic repercussions onunemployment and investment referred to. As TheGuardian newspaper noted:But victims in the poor neighbourhood of Santander werenot convinced. ‘We had to build this place without statehelp, and no doubt we will have to rebuild it ourselvestoo,’ said a group of men huddled round their campfire.‘They will only invest their money where they can get adecent return.’ (The Guardian 1.2.99)The cost of re-building Colombia’s coffee growingregion could cost $1.5 billion, a cost which thisdeveloping country could ill-afford. Yet, there is littlediscussion of how the money will be raised, as TheFinancial Times noted:Juan Camilo Restrepo, finance minister, said the packageto help restore normality would total 60bn pesos (aboutDollars 38m)…Mr. Restrepo said the package would beavailable to affected coffee producers by Monday. Headded that the package would consist of “long-term, softDFID – July 2000 59
- Page 1 and 2:
issuesDFIDDepartmentforInternationa
- Page 3 and 4:
Introduction to the Three-Part Stud
- Page 5 and 6:
MethodologiesI. Content study condu
- Page 7 and 8:
III. Production study conducted by
- Page 9 and 10:
ContentsA. Key Findings 3A.1. Conte
- Page 11 and 12:
A. Key FindingsA.1.●●●●●
- Page 13 and 14:
B. SummariesB.1.Content Study(Glasg
- Page 15 and 16: ulletins, followed by aid/developme
- Page 17 and 18: travel/adventure programmes in the
- Page 19 and 20: EXERCISE 4: COMIC RELIEFGroups were
- Page 21 and 22: Cookery programmes seemed to bring
- Page 23 and 24: Content and Audience Studies(Glasgo
- Page 25 and 26: events. Jamaica featured only in sp
- Page 27 and 28: Comparing Figures 1, 2 and 3 shows
- Page 29 and 30: Figure 6: BBC coverage of the devel
- Page 31 and 32: and Newsnight were also much more l
- Page 33 and 34: Figure 1: Number of references made
- Page 35 and 36: Newscaster: Well of course they may
- Page 37 and 38: A fifth possible consequence of the
- Page 39 and 40: American accusations of discriminat
- Page 41 and 42: the desire of the small scale farme
- Page 43 and 44: industry in considerable detail. Th
- Page 45 and 46: statement made. The wide range and
- Page 47 and 48: C.2.2.3. The Presidential elections
- Page 49 and 50: The Newsnight report on the electio
- Page 51 and 52: work in the South. Nobody will allo
- Page 53 and 54: fashion, but they are not allowed t
- Page 55 and 56: attack. Sky News reported, ‘It is
- Page 57 and 58: There is little explanation of why
- Page 59 and 60: these thugs which stated that they
- Page 61 and 62: differentiated continent, with many
- Page 63 and 64: ambassador, Humberto De La Calle wa
- Page 65: say the government is doing nothing
- Page 69 and 70: education. The reporter then linked
- Page 71 and 72: A significant section of BBC1’s s
- Page 73 and 74: Although a range of countries are i
- Page 75 and 76: pop stars supported a big campaign
- Page 77 and 78: discussion of the total so far achi
- Page 79 and 80: We’ve had a number of Britons ove
- Page 81 and 82: the introduction to the feature, wi
- Page 83 and 84: with the question he posed at the e
- Page 85 and 86: numerous references to the improved
- Page 87 and 88: public opinion was adverse to it an
- Page 89 and 90: have a vested interest in the judge
- Page 91 and 92: family are about to leave Nigeria f
- Page 93 and 94: had helped orphaned children in Uga
- Page 95 and 96: There are 100,000 widows in Rwanda
- Page 97 and 98: victims without engendering a total
- Page 99 and 100: minimum payments and the totals mus
- Page 101 and 102: Programme title Channel Date Destin
- Page 103 and 104: into. Little background information
- Page 105 and 106: TOURIST DEVELOPMENTThere is a disti
- Page 107 and 108: Guide: I think that the mere fact t
- Page 109 and 110: For many visitors this is their fir
- Page 111 and 112: I was a third of the way through my
- Page 113 and 114: inhabiting an isolated Mongolian vi
- Page 115 and 116: well as its Southern tip. It was wi
- Page 117 and 118:
Six million people are crammed into
- Page 119 and 120:
magpie approach to the countries he
- Page 121 and 122:
Fiestas in Mexico have a unique exu
- Page 123 and 124:
concerned the hunting skills of bus
- Page 125 and 126:
traditional Peruvian culture and in
- Page 127 and 128:
HISTORYPinochet and Allende: The An
- Page 129 and 130:
Trailblazers where to varying exten
- Page 131 and 132:
D.1.3. Group discussionOnce the exe
- Page 133 and 134:
Dominican Republic for 14 nights al
- Page 135 and 136:
NATURAL HISTORY/WILDLIFEMost respon
- Page 137 and 138:
Moderator: Do you like Comic Relief
- Page 139 and 140:
1st: There’s only so much you can
- Page 141 and 142:
quarters of an hour to phone and th
- Page 143 and 144:
think of China as being quite an in
- Page 145 and 146:
selective (in relation to the issue
- Page 147 and 148:
1st: They haven’t even got an eco
- Page 149 and 150:
government would have to really get
- Page 151 and 152:
world as not much more than a serie
- Page 153 and 154:
F. Appendix: Countries of the devel
- Page 155 and 156:
G. Production Study (3WE)G.1.G.1.1.
- Page 157 and 158:
NEWSRichard Ayre, Deputy Chief Exec
- Page 159 and 160:
policymakers/commissioning editors
- Page 161 and 162:
G.2.2.6. Belief in regulatory prote
- Page 163 and 164:
gloomy, so we call our programmes
- Page 165 and 166:
“There may be more caution about
- Page 167 and 168:
what their audience wants and we le
- Page 169 and 170:
“Problems and issues have traditi
- Page 171 and 172:
“You still need substance, but no
- Page 173 and 174:
“The programmes aren’t of inter
- Page 175 and 176:
G.5.3. What does work on television
- Page 177 and 178:
“Pre-trailed news stories are bec
- Page 179 and 180:
“It seems that documentaries are
- Page 181 and 182:
H. ConclusionTelevision output that
- Page 183 and 184:
I. RecommendationsIt could therefor
- Page 185:
editors it has been pursued with in