03.12.2015 Views

bbc 2015

BBC2015_booklet

BBC2015_booklet

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

BeNeLux Bioinformatics Conference – Antwerp, December 7-8 <strong>2015</strong><br />

Abstract ID: O17<br />

Oral presentation<br />

10th Benelux Bioinformatics Conference <strong>bbc</strong> <strong>2015</strong><br />

O17. GENE CO-EXPRESSION ANALYSIS IDENTIFIES BRAIN REGIONS AND<br />

CELL TYPES INVOLVED IN MIGRAINE PATHOPHYSIOLOGY: A GWAS-<br />

BASED STUDY USING THE ALLEN HUMAN BRAIN ATLAS<br />

Sjoerd M.H. Huisman 1,2* , Else Eising 3 , Ahmed Mahfouz 1,2 , Lisanne Vijfhuizen 3 , International Headache Genetics<br />

Consortium, Boudewijn P.F. Lelieveldt 2 , Arn M.J.M. van den Maagdenberg 3,4 & Marcel J.T. Reinders 1 .<br />

DBL, Dept. of Intelligent Systems, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands 1 ; LKEB, Dept. of Radiology, Leiden<br />

University Medical Center, The Netherlands 2 ; Dept. of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, The<br />

Netherlands 3 ; Dept. of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands 4 . * s.m.h.huisman@tudelft.nl<br />

Migraine is a common brain disorder, with a heritability of around 50%. To understand the genetic component of this<br />

disease, a large genome wide association study has been carried out. Several loci were identified, but their interpretation<br />

remained challenging. We integrated the GWAS results with gene expression data, from healthy human brains, to<br />

identify anatomical regions and biological pathways implicated in migraine pathophysiology.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Genome Wide Association Studies (GWAS) are<br />

frequently used to find common variants with small effect<br />

sizes. However, they often provide researchers with short<br />

lists of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with<br />

uncertain connections to biological functions.<br />

We present an analysis of GWAS data for migraine, where<br />

the full list of SNP statistics is used to find groups of<br />

functionally related migraine-associated genes. For this<br />

end we make use of gene co-expression in the healthy<br />

human brain.<br />

We performed genome wide clustering of genes, followed<br />

by enrichment analysis for migraine candidate genes. In<br />

addition, we constructed local co-expression networks<br />

around high-confidence genes. Both approaches converge<br />

on distinct biological functions and brain regions of<br />

interest.<br />

METHODS<br />

Migraine GWAS data was obtained from the International<br />

Headache Genetics Consortium, with 23,285 cases and<br />

95,425 controls (Anttila et al., 2013). Genes were scored<br />

by SNP load and divided into high-confidence genes,<br />

migraine candidate genes, and non-migraine genes.<br />

Spatial gene expression data in the healthy adult human<br />

brain was obtained from the Allen Brain Institute<br />

(Hawrylycz et al., 2012). It contains microarray<br />

expression values of 3702 samples from 6 donors. Robust<br />

gene co-expressions were used to cluster genes into 18<br />

modules, which were then tested for enrichment of<br />

migraine candidate genes, and functionally characterized.<br />

In a second approach, local co-expression networks were<br />

built around the high-confidence migraine genes. These<br />

local networks were then compared to the modules of the<br />

first approach.<br />

RESULTS & DISCUSSION<br />

The genome wide analysis revealed several modules of<br />

genes enriched in migraine candidates. Two modules have<br />

preferential expression in the cerebral cortex and are<br />

enriched in synapse related annotations and neuron<br />

specific genes. A third module contains oligodendrocytes<br />

and genes preferentially expressed in subcortical regions.<br />

The local co-expression networks, of the second approach,<br />

converge on the same pathways and expression patterns,<br />

even though the high confidence genes lie mostly outside<br />

of the modules of interest. This provides a control to the<br />

results of the first approach.<br />

FIGURE 1. The co-expression network around high confidence migraine<br />

genes of the second approach. Genes (and links between them) of the<br />

migraine modules of the first approach are coloured in red, yellow, blue,<br />

and green.<br />

The analyses confirm the previously observed link<br />

between migraine and cortical neurotransmission. They<br />

also point to the involvement of subcortical myelination,<br />

which is in line with recent tentative findings. These<br />

results show that more relevant information can be<br />

extracted from GWAS results, using (publicly available)<br />

tissue specific expression patterns.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Anttila V. et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies new susceptibility<br />

loci for migraine. Nat. Genet. 45, 912–7, (2013).<br />

Hawrylycz M.J. et al. An anatomically comprehensive atlas of the adult<br />

human brain transcriptome. Nature 489, 391–9, (2012).<br />

37

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!