03.12.2015 Views

bbc 2015

BBC2015_booklet

BBC2015_booklet

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

BeNeLux Bioinformatics Conference – Antwerp, December 7-8 <strong>2015</strong><br />

Abstract ID: P<br />

Poster<br />

10th Benelux Bioinformatics Conference <strong>bbc</strong> <strong>2015</strong><br />

P18. RNA-SEQ REVEALS ALTERNATIVE SPLICING WITH<br />

ALTERNATIVE FUNCTIONALITY IN MUSHROOMS<br />

Thies Gehrmann 1 , Jordi F. Pelkmans 2 , Han Wösten 2 , Marcel J.T. Reinders 1 & Thomas Abeel 1* .<br />

Delft Bioinformatics Lab, Delft Technical University 1 ; Fungal Microbiology, Science Faculty, Utrecht University 2 ;<br />

* T.Abeel@tudelft.nl<br />

Alternative splicing is well studied in mammalian genomes, and alternative transcripts are often associated with disease<br />

and their role in regulation is gradually being unveiled. In fungi, the study of alternative splicing has only scratched the<br />

surface. Using RNA-Seq data, we predict alternative transcripts based on existing gene predictions in two mushroom<br />

forming fungi. We study the alternative functionality of genes through functional domains, developmental stages, tissue<br />

and time. This analysis reveals the amount of alternative functionality induced by alternative splicing which was<br />

previously unknown in fungi, and asserts the need for further research.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Transcriptreconstruction algorithms rely on the sparsity<br />

(intergenic regions) of the genome in order distinguish<br />

between genes. In fungi, due to the density of the genome,<br />

transcripts overlap in the up and down-stream untranslated<br />

regions (UTRs) and prevent the use of existing tools for<br />

transcript prediction (Roberts et. al. 2011). Previous<br />

studies (Xie et. al. <strong>2015</strong>, Zhao et. al. 2013), were limited<br />

to the study of splice junctions, more advanced functional<br />

analyses. We transform the genomes of S. commune and A.<br />

bisporusin order to enable the prediction of alternative<br />

transcripts applying existing transcript reconstruction<br />

algorithms to RNA-Seq data from different tissue types<br />

and developmental stages. We present a functional<br />

analysis of the resulting transcripts.<br />

METHODS<br />

We apply a transformation on our fungal genomes in order<br />

to reduce the impact of overlapping UTRs which prevent<br />

the prediction of alternative transcripts. We split the<br />

genome into chunks, with each chunk being defined by<br />

existing gene annotations. Thus, the transformation<br />

essentially removes intergenic regions (which contain the<br />

UTRs). Each chunk is then analyzed separately by<br />

Cufflinks (Roberts et. al. 2011). Predicted transcripts are<br />

filtered based on read information and ORF sanity. Protein<br />

domain annotations are predicted for each transcript using<br />

InterPro (Zdobnov & Apweiler 2001).<br />

For each gene with multiple alternative transcripts, we<br />

construct a consensus sequence which allows us to call<br />

specific splicing events without the influence of erroneous<br />

reference annotations.<br />

RESULTS & DISCUSSION<br />

For both fungi, we find that alternative splicing is<br />

prevalent and many genes have multiple alternative<br />

transcripts (see Table 1).<br />

# Orig. Genes # Filt. # Transcripts<br />

Genes<br />

S. commune<br />

16,319 14,615 20,077<br />

A. bisporus<br />

10,438 9612 14,320<br />

TABLE 1. The number of originally annotated genes in S. Commune and<br />

A. Bisporus is decreased after prediction based on RNA-Seq data filters<br />

them out. The number of new transcripts predicted indicates that<br />

alternative splicing is not a rare event in these fungi.<br />

The frequency of specific events in the two fungi are<br />

similar and match what is seen in humans (Sammeth, M,<br />

et. al. 2008). However, there are significant differences in<br />

the event usage. While most transcripts in S. commune<br />

only have one event associated with it, most transcripts in<br />

A. Bisporushave at least two events. We show that this is a<br />

result of co-operative events.<br />

As our dataset consists of multiple developmental timepoints<br />

and tissue types, we are able to observe the<br />

alternative use of transcripts through time. If a gene swaps<br />

transcript usage at a certain time point, this is indicative of<br />

a functional involvement of that particular transcript (Lees<br />

et. al. <strong>2015</strong>). We find multiple transcripts in both S.<br />

commune and A. bisporus which are activated in specific<br />

developmental stages of the mushroom. Furthermore, in A.<br />

bisporus, we are able to identify transcripts which are<br />

activated specifically for certain tissue types through<br />

development.<br />

Using protein domain predictions for each transcript in a<br />

gene, we can measure how gene functionality changes<br />

across its transcripts. Figure 1 shows that functional<br />

annotations are not always preserved across all transcripts,<br />

indicating alternative functionality.<br />

FIGURE 1. Many genes in S. commune demonstrate alternative<br />

functionality through alternative splicing<br />

This is the first genome-wide functional analysis of<br />

alternative splicing in fungi from RNA-Seq data. We find<br />

a wealth of alternative splicing events in two fungi,<br />

resulting in many newly discovered transcripts. Although<br />

their functional influence is not yet demonstrated, we<br />

present evidence to suggest that they are relevant to<br />

mushroom development.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Lees, J. G., et. al. BMC Genomics, 16:1 (<strong>2015</strong>)<br />

Roberts, A., et. al. Bioinformatics 27:17, 2325–2329. (2011)<br />

Sammeth, M., et. al. PLoS Computational Biology, 4:8. (2008)<br />

Xie, B.-B., et. al.. BMC Genomics, 16:54(<strong>2015</strong>).<br />

Zdobnov, E. M., & Apweiler, R. Bioinformatics 17:9 (2001)<br />

Zhao, C., et. al. BMC Genomics, 14:21. (2013).<br />

62

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!