03.12.2015 Views

bbc 2015

BBC2015_booklet

BBC2015_booklet

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

BeNeLux Bioinformatics Conference – Antwerp, December 7-8 <strong>2015</strong><br />

Abstract ID: P<br />

Poster<br />

10th Benelux Bioinformatics Conference <strong>bbc</strong> <strong>2015</strong><br />

P12. PHENETIC: MULTI-OMICS DATA INTERPRETATION USING<br />

INTERACTION NETWORKS<br />

Dries De Maeyer 1,2,3* , Bram Weytjens 1,2,3 , Luc De Raedt 4 & Kathleen Marchal 2,3 .<br />

Centre for Microbial and Plant Genetics, KULeuven 1 ; Department for Information Sciences (INTEC, IMinds), UGent 2 ;<br />

Department for Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, UGent 3 ; Department of Computer Science, KULeuven 4 .<br />

* dries.demaeyer@biw.kuleuven.be<br />

The omics revolution has introduced new challenges when studying interesting phenotypes. High throughput omics<br />

technologies such as next-generation sequencing and microarray technologies generate large amounts of data.<br />

Interpreting the resulting data from these experiments is not trivial due to the data’s size and the inherent noise of the<br />

underlying technologies. In addition to this, the “omics” technologies have led to an ever expanding biological<br />

knowledge which has to be taken into account when interpreting new experimental results. Interaction network in<br />

combination with subnetwork inference methods provide a solution to this problem by mining the current public<br />

interactomics knowledge using experimental omics data to better understand the molecular mechanisms driving the<br />

interesting phenotypes under study.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Computational methods are becoming essential for<br />

analyzing large scale omics datasets in the light of current<br />

knowledge. By representing publicly available<br />

interactomics knowledge as interaction networks<br />

subnetwork inference methods can extract the actual<br />

molecular mechanisms that drive an interesting phenotype.<br />

The PheNetic framework is such a method that allows for<br />

mining interaction networks with multi-omics datasets.<br />

Using this framework different types of biological<br />

applications have been analyzed in the past such as KOtranscriptomics<br />

interpretation (De Maeyer, 2013),<br />

expression analysis (De Maeyer, <strong>2015</strong>) and distinguishing<br />

driver from passenger mutation from eQTL experiments<br />

(De Maeyer).<br />

METHODS<br />

Interaction networks provide a flexible representation of<br />

public biological interactomics knowledge. These<br />

networks represent the physical interactions between<br />

genes and their corresponding gene products in the<br />

interactome of the organism under research (Cloots, 2011).<br />

The interaction network integrates different layers of<br />

homogeneous interactomics data, e.g. signalling, proteinprotein,<br />

(post)transcriptional and metabolic interactomics<br />

data, into a single heterogeneous network representation.<br />

The PheNetic framework uses interaction networks to find<br />

biologically valid paths which connect (in)activated genes<br />

selected from multi-omics data sets. These paths provide a<br />

biological explanation of how the genes from these data<br />

sets can trigger each other. Finding the best explanations<br />

or paths in the interaction network corresponds to finding<br />

that subnetwork that best explains the observed results and<br />

provides an insight into the molecular mechanisms that<br />

drive the interesting phenotype. Depending on the type of<br />

biological application and provided data different types of<br />

paths can be used to infer the subnetwork such as KOtranscriptomics<br />

interpretation (De Maeyer, 2013),<br />

expression analysis (De Maeyer, <strong>2015</strong>) and interpreting<br />

eQTL experiments (De Maeyer).<br />

RESULTS & DISCUSSION<br />

In a first setup PheNetic was used to study the pathways<br />

and processes involved in acid resistance in Escherichia<br />

coli (De Maeyer, 2013). Using our framework we were<br />

able to determine the different molecular pathways that<br />

drive acid resistance and identify the regulators that<br />

underlie this phenotype. It was shown that subnetwork<br />

inference methods outperform naïve gene rankings in<br />

identifying the biological pathways associated with the<br />

phenotype under research based.<br />

In a second setup PheNetic was used to interpret<br />

expression data (De Maeyer, <strong>2015</strong>) to extract from the<br />

interaction network those parts of the interaction network<br />

that show differences in expression. This method was<br />

provided as a web server that can be accessed at<br />

http://bioinformatics.intec.ugent.be/<br />

phenetic and that allows for an intuitive and visual<br />

interpretation of the inferred subnetworks.<br />

In a third setup PheNetic was used to select driver<br />

mutations from passenger mutations in coupled genetictranscriptomics<br />

data sets from evolution experiments (De<br />

Maeyer). Evolved strains with the same phenotype are<br />

expected to have consistent changes in the same pathways.<br />

Therefore, finding the subnetwork that best connects the<br />

mutations to the differentially expressed genes over all<br />

strains is expected to identify the driver mutations over<br />

passenger mutations in combination with identifying the<br />

molecular mechanisms that induce the observed change in<br />

phenotype. This approach provides a systemic insight in<br />

both the biological processes and genetic background that<br />

induces phenotype.<br />

Based on the different approaches it can be concluded that<br />

PheNetic is a flexible framework for subnetwork selection<br />

that allows for solving a large variety of biological<br />

applications using multi-omics data sets.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Cloots, L., & Marchal, K. (2011). Curr Opin Microbiol, 14(5), 599-607.<br />

De Maeyer, D., Renkens, J., Cloots, L., De Raedt, L., & Marchal, K.<br />

(2013). Mol Biosyst, 9(7), 1594-1603.<br />

De Maeyer, D., Weytjens, B., Renkens, J., De Raedt, L., & Marchal, K.<br />

(<strong>2015</strong>). Nucleic Acids Res, 43(W1), W244-250.<br />

De Maeyer, D., Weytjens, B., De Raedt, L., & Marchal, K. Molecular<br />

biology and evolution. Submitted<br />

56

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!