bbc 2015
BBC2015_booklet
BBC2015_booklet
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
BeNeLux Bioinformatics Conference – Antwerp, December 7-8 <strong>2015</strong><br />
Abstract ID: P<br />
Poster<br />
10th Benelux Bioinformatics Conference <strong>bbc</strong> <strong>2015</strong><br />
P12. PHENETIC: MULTI-OMICS DATA INTERPRETATION USING<br />
INTERACTION NETWORKS<br />
Dries De Maeyer 1,2,3* , Bram Weytjens 1,2,3 , Luc De Raedt 4 & Kathleen Marchal 2,3 .<br />
Centre for Microbial and Plant Genetics, KULeuven 1 ; Department for Information Sciences (INTEC, IMinds), UGent 2 ;<br />
Department for Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, UGent 3 ; Department of Computer Science, KULeuven 4 .<br />
* dries.demaeyer@biw.kuleuven.be<br />
The omics revolution has introduced new challenges when studying interesting phenotypes. High throughput omics<br />
technologies such as next-generation sequencing and microarray technologies generate large amounts of data.<br />
Interpreting the resulting data from these experiments is not trivial due to the data’s size and the inherent noise of the<br />
underlying technologies. In addition to this, the “omics” technologies have led to an ever expanding biological<br />
knowledge which has to be taken into account when interpreting new experimental results. Interaction network in<br />
combination with subnetwork inference methods provide a solution to this problem by mining the current public<br />
interactomics knowledge using experimental omics data to better understand the molecular mechanisms driving the<br />
interesting phenotypes under study.<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
Computational methods are becoming essential for<br />
analyzing large scale omics datasets in the light of current<br />
knowledge. By representing publicly available<br />
interactomics knowledge as interaction networks<br />
subnetwork inference methods can extract the actual<br />
molecular mechanisms that drive an interesting phenotype.<br />
The PheNetic framework is such a method that allows for<br />
mining interaction networks with multi-omics datasets.<br />
Using this framework different types of biological<br />
applications have been analyzed in the past such as KOtranscriptomics<br />
interpretation (De Maeyer, 2013),<br />
expression analysis (De Maeyer, <strong>2015</strong>) and distinguishing<br />
driver from passenger mutation from eQTL experiments<br />
(De Maeyer).<br />
METHODS<br />
Interaction networks provide a flexible representation of<br />
public biological interactomics knowledge. These<br />
networks represent the physical interactions between<br />
genes and their corresponding gene products in the<br />
interactome of the organism under research (Cloots, 2011).<br />
The interaction network integrates different layers of<br />
homogeneous interactomics data, e.g. signalling, proteinprotein,<br />
(post)transcriptional and metabolic interactomics<br />
data, into a single heterogeneous network representation.<br />
The PheNetic framework uses interaction networks to find<br />
biologically valid paths which connect (in)activated genes<br />
selected from multi-omics data sets. These paths provide a<br />
biological explanation of how the genes from these data<br />
sets can trigger each other. Finding the best explanations<br />
or paths in the interaction network corresponds to finding<br />
that subnetwork that best explains the observed results and<br />
provides an insight into the molecular mechanisms that<br />
drive the interesting phenotype. Depending on the type of<br />
biological application and provided data different types of<br />
paths can be used to infer the subnetwork such as KOtranscriptomics<br />
interpretation (De Maeyer, 2013),<br />
expression analysis (De Maeyer, <strong>2015</strong>) and interpreting<br />
eQTL experiments (De Maeyer).<br />
RESULTS & DISCUSSION<br />
In a first setup PheNetic was used to study the pathways<br />
and processes involved in acid resistance in Escherichia<br />
coli (De Maeyer, 2013). Using our framework we were<br />
able to determine the different molecular pathways that<br />
drive acid resistance and identify the regulators that<br />
underlie this phenotype. It was shown that subnetwork<br />
inference methods outperform naïve gene rankings in<br />
identifying the biological pathways associated with the<br />
phenotype under research based.<br />
In a second setup PheNetic was used to interpret<br />
expression data (De Maeyer, <strong>2015</strong>) to extract from the<br />
interaction network those parts of the interaction network<br />
that show differences in expression. This method was<br />
provided as a web server that can be accessed at<br />
http://bioinformatics.intec.ugent.be/<br />
phenetic and that allows for an intuitive and visual<br />
interpretation of the inferred subnetworks.<br />
In a third setup PheNetic was used to select driver<br />
mutations from passenger mutations in coupled genetictranscriptomics<br />
data sets from evolution experiments (De<br />
Maeyer). Evolved strains with the same phenotype are<br />
expected to have consistent changes in the same pathways.<br />
Therefore, finding the subnetwork that best connects the<br />
mutations to the differentially expressed genes over all<br />
strains is expected to identify the driver mutations over<br />
passenger mutations in combination with identifying the<br />
molecular mechanisms that induce the observed change in<br />
phenotype. This approach provides a systemic insight in<br />
both the biological processes and genetic background that<br />
induces phenotype.<br />
Based on the different approaches it can be concluded that<br />
PheNetic is a flexible framework for subnetwork selection<br />
that allows for solving a large variety of biological<br />
applications using multi-omics data sets.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
Cloots, L., & Marchal, K. (2011). Curr Opin Microbiol, 14(5), 599-607.<br />
De Maeyer, D., Renkens, J., Cloots, L., De Raedt, L., & Marchal, K.<br />
(2013). Mol Biosyst, 9(7), 1594-1603.<br />
De Maeyer, D., Weytjens, B., Renkens, J., De Raedt, L., & Marchal, K.<br />
(<strong>2015</strong>). Nucleic Acids Res, 43(W1), W244-250.<br />
De Maeyer, D., Weytjens, B., De Raedt, L., & Marchal, K. Molecular<br />
biology and evolution. Submitted<br />
56