WINTER 2016
Distributor's Link Magazine Winter Issue 2016 / Vol 39 No1
Distributor's Link Magazine Winter Issue 2016 / Vol 39 No1
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
160 THE DISTRIBUTOR’S LINK<br />
CARMEN VERTULLO TO BAKE OR NOT TO BAKE? from page 114<br />
Nuts are generally immune to HE as there are no<br />
commercial nuts with specified core hardness at the<br />
susceptible level, however I have seen HE failure of zinc<br />
plated nuts which have been improperly heat treated. While<br />
nuts are not technically tensile loaded fasteners, there are<br />
very high radial tensile loads throughout the nut cross<br />
section. Some nuts, such as clinch nuts, have no specified<br />
hardness but need to be hard in order to function and the<br />
specification (e.g. NASM 45938) requires baking if hardness<br />
is above HRC 39.<br />
Socket set screws are certainly at the hardness level<br />
where they are HE susceptible if plated, but they are strictly<br />
compression fasteners and should not experience the type<br />
of loading that leads to HE. Once again though, I have seen<br />
HE failures in plated socket set screws.<br />
ASTM F436 hardened flat washers have a specification<br />
hardness of HRC 38-45, and even though they are always in<br />
compression, in some applications (uneven surfaces or<br />
across a slot) they may be put into bending stress which is<br />
severe loading, so unless there is good knowledge and<br />
control of the application which does not include bending<br />
stress, these washers should be baked. It would be<br />
impractical to try to control the hardness below HRC 40, but<br />
depending on the application a hard washer that is not so<br />
hard, say HRC 36 may be suitable for a specific application<br />
and that could be chosen instead of the F436 hardened flat<br />
washer.<br />
What Processes Require Baking?<br />
It will be the product that determines if baking is<br />
necessary before the process comes into play. Once we have<br />
susceptible product (HRC 39 and above) then we ask if the<br />
process generates hydrogen and if it does, does the<br />
hydrogen enter the product and if it does enter the product<br />
can it get out on its own or is it constrained in the material<br />
by the coating? Assuming we have a susceptible part, at the<br />
top of this list are electroplated coatings such as zinc and<br />
cadmium because they generate hydrogen, it gets in the<br />
steel and it cannot get back out through these coatings.<br />
Electroplated zinc is a particularly impermeable coating.<br />
Coatings such as zinc-nickel are more permeable and while<br />
HE susceptible fasteners with this coating may still be baked,<br />
they are far less likely to hold the hydrogen in.<br />
What Processes Do Not Require Baking?<br />
Much effort and research has been spent on developing<br />
new coatings for high strength fasteners that do not induce<br />
HE, and in determining which standard coatings and<br />
processes do not cause HE. Any process that does not<br />
produce hydrogen or prevents it from entering the steel is a<br />
safe bet. Unfortunately the literature and the specifications<br />
are not clear on which is which. At the top of the list of non-<br />
HE inducing coatings are mechanical zinc, dip-spin coatings,<br />
black oxide, phosphate coatings, and electroless nickel -<br />
which does not generate hydrogen. Even if the coating or<br />
cleaning process exposes the fastener to hydrogen and it<br />
gets into the steel it will diffuse out of the product on its own<br />
in a short time without the need for baking because the<br />
coatings (except for electroless nickel) are very permeable to<br />
hydrogen. That is why some processors require that<br />
fasteners with these processes be held for 24 hours after<br />
coating before shipping or use. HE risk can be further<br />
reduced with the use of plating and cleaning processes that<br />
generate less hydrogen. A combination of strategies can<br />
provide an overall process that proves to be non-HE inducing<br />
thus precluding the need for baking.<br />
For How Long Do We Need To Bake?<br />
Right next to “bake or not to bake” this is the money<br />
question. The answer is - however long it takes to get enough<br />
of the hydrogen out of the product to eliminate the HE risk.<br />
We have seen requirements of from 2 hours to 48 hours,<br />
usually based on the hardness of the product. The<br />
permeability of the coating is also an important factor –<br />
possibly the most important factor in the baking time, and<br />
relates directly to the coating thickness. Most specifications<br />
only use material hardness or tensile strength as a baking<br />
time criteria and do not consider coating thickness, but their<br />
requirements will usually accommodate the thicker coatings.<br />
Thinner coatings may allow for a shorter baking time but<br />
must be qualified by testing (more on that later). Current<br />
electroplating specifications ASTM 1941/F1941M-15<br />
require a minimum of 14 hours for products with a specified<br />
hardness of over HRC 39 and up to HRC 44, and 24 hours<br />
minimum for fasteners with a specified hardness over HRC<br />
44. In the absence of specification guidance the<br />
requirements for baking must be agreed upon by the<br />
customer and the supplier, or the supplier is responsible for<br />
determining baking times.<br />
The size and configuration of the fastener may also<br />
affect baking times, but there is no verifiable research at this<br />
time to indicate which way to go. Small fasteners with very<br />
thin coatings (e.g. smaller than .25” or 6 mm, .0001” thick<br />
coatings) may be effectively baked at lower times if verified<br />
by testing. Very low baking times such as 4 hours are not<br />
effective and are a waste of time and money. It is not difficult<br />
with some thought to develop a comprehensive baking time<br />
strategy based on the product and the coating process.<br />
CONTINUED ON PAGE 173