16.12.2015 Views

WINTER 2016

Distributor's Link Magazine Winter Issue 2016 / Vol 39 No1

Distributor's Link Magazine Winter Issue 2016 / Vol 39 No1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

58 THE DISTRIBUTOR’S LINK<br />

ASTM INTERNATIONAL<br />

100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428<br />

TEL 610-832-9500 FAX 610-832-9666 WEB www.astm.org<br />

ALIGNED AND COMBINED - THE NEW LOOK OF<br />

ASTM STRUCTURAL BOLT SPECIFICATIONS by Chad Larson<br />

Structural fasteners originated as a practical, high<br />

strength replacement for the practice of riveting. Now,<br />

these fasteners are used extensively to hold together all<br />

types of steel structures.<br />

Hundreds of millions of structural fasteners are<br />

produced to ASTM International standards each year.<br />

These critical building and<br />

infrastructure components are<br />

installed by contractors, steel<br />

fabricators and steel erectors to<br />

various industry requirements.<br />

Until recently, structural<br />

fasteners were covered by six<br />

different ASTM International<br />

standards: A325 and A325M,<br />

A490 and A490M, F1852 and<br />

F2280. These standards covered<br />

steel and alloy steel heavy hex<br />

bolts as well as twist-off type structural bolt/nut/washer<br />

assemblies.<br />

The six standards were maintained by Subcommittee<br />

F16.02 on Steel Bolts, Nuts, Rivets and Washers, part of<br />

ASTM Committee F16 on Fasteners. However, it became<br />

difficult for F16.02 to effectively maintain continuity across<br />

the standards. The subcommittee was spending more time<br />

on maintenance than it was on thoughtful and progressive<br />

improvement of the standards.<br />

In order to simplify matters, F16.02 initiated a task<br />

group to consolidate the standards. The task group would<br />

take a top down approach to the consolidation, recrafting a<br />

single new standard from the six. The new standard would<br />

need to address the requirements covered in the six older<br />

specifications, while also adding new information.<br />

After the original combined draft was created, it was<br />

proposed as a solution to the F16 executive committee,<br />

who gave it a great deal of support. The proposal was also<br />

discussed with the leadership of American Institute of<br />

Steel Construction and the Research Council on Structural<br />

TECHNICAL ARTICLE<br />

Connections, which were very helpful in clarifying industry<br />

needs and providing relevant feedback. There would need<br />

to be compromise by the F16 committee to adopt such a<br />

significant change, but also compromise within the<br />

standard itself to have a chance of passing a committee<br />

vote.<br />

Our task group of wellrespected<br />

producer, general<br />

interest and user members was<br />

instrumental in shaping not only<br />

a better standard, but also one<br />

that had enough committee<br />

support to pass a ballot.<br />

The result of the effort of the<br />

task group, the committee, and<br />

ASTM staff was the approval of<br />

F3125, Specification for High<br />

Strength Structural Bolts, Steel<br />

and Alloy Steel, Heat Treated, 120 ksi (830 MPa) and 150<br />

ksi (1040 MPa) Minimum Tensile Strength, Inch and Metric<br />

Dimensions, a new structural bolt standard that will replace<br />

the six current structural fastener standards.<br />

The resulting document is an example of what can<br />

happen when fresh perspective, cooperation and effort<br />

combine in the consensus standard process. F3125<br />

maintains virtually all of the previous technical<br />

requirements, while adding needed changes and<br />

improvements. All of this was accomplished very efficiently.<br />

Users of the new standard will include fastener<br />

manufacturers, structural engineers and numerous related<br />

steel construction agencies. While there may be some<br />

short-term issues with a change of this magnitude to such<br />

far-reaching standards, the benefits of a simplified<br />

document will be recognized for years to come. From a<br />

committee perspective, the ongoing maintenance will be<br />

much easier, allowing valuable committee time to be spent<br />

identifying and addressing other areas of improvement<br />

within Subcommittee F16.02.<br />

ASTM INTERNATIONAL

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!