WINTER 2016
Distributor's Link Magazine Winter Issue 2016 / Vol 39 No1
Distributor's Link Magazine Winter Issue 2016 / Vol 39 No1
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
172 THE DISTRIBUTOR’S LINK<br />
CARMEN VERTULLO TO BAKE OR NOT TO BAKE? from page 160<br />
How the processor controls, monitors and reports the<br />
baking time is very important. Time starts when the<br />
fasteners reach the baking temperature, not when they go<br />
into the oven. The processor should be able to report on the<br />
start time, finish time, hours at temperature and baking<br />
temperature, all relatable to the specific lot or lots of<br />
fasteners, in a clear and concise fashion. The baking oven<br />
should have good controls, good instrumentation capable of<br />
measuring the temperature of the fasteners, and a<br />
recording system. It must be in current calibration at all<br />
times. The plater should have adequate oven capacity and<br />
a good understanding of the equipment capability and<br />
characteristics. Baking records with lot traceability should<br />
be easily and quickly retrievable.<br />
When In The Process Sequence Should The<br />
Baking Be Done?<br />
Older specifications usually say that baking should be<br />
done as soon as possible after plating, such as within one<br />
hour or not longer than 4 hours after plating. It has been<br />
shown that this is not critical to removing hydrogen, but it is<br />
a good practice to bake without delay for the sake of<br />
variable control and lead time. It is important that the<br />
product be kept clean and dry between plating and baking.<br />
Baking must be done before any other process such as<br />
chromate conversion coatings or other top coats as they<br />
may be damaged by heat. Some major industrial processors<br />
have in-line baking ovens which accomplish baking with no<br />
delay. In any case, if there are issues with the efficacy of the<br />
baking process, time between plating and baking should not<br />
be considered a factor. Some processors have found that<br />
HE risk can be lowered by baking certain materials prior to<br />
plating, or baking as an intermediate step after a very thin<br />
coating is applied and then completing the process with<br />
additional coating thickness.<br />
Who Decides?<br />
The fastener supplier or user should be making post<br />
plating HE relief baking decisions directly, even if they rely<br />
on specifications, drawings or contract requirements to<br />
make those decisions. Some specifications such as ASTM<br />
F1941/F1941M require the supplier and user to come to an<br />
agreement regarding baking and testing. Too often the<br />
decision is left to the plating vendor who probably looks at<br />
the fastener head mark and makes a judgement based on<br />
the fastener’s specification maximum hardness and ASTM<br />
B850, which can cause confusion when used for fasteners.<br />
Purchase orders to the plater should not say simply “zinc<br />
and bake”. Even being “explicit” by saying “plate and bake<br />
per ASTM F1941” still leaves the plater with an<br />
interpretation decision. Plating Purchase Orders should<br />
clearly state the plating specification, baking temperature<br />
and time, and if baking is not required when it normally<br />
might be.<br />
How Much Does It Cost?<br />
The important thing to know is there is a cost and it is<br />
not only the additional charge but also the lead time and the<br />
certification checking and maintenance, which if done<br />
properly will take someone’s time. The cost for baking will<br />
add at least 10 to 30 percent to the plating cost and could<br />
easily double it depending on the baking time. This can be<br />
a significant part of the cost of the product, especially for<br />
small lots. To remain competitive it is important to not bake<br />
parts that do not need baked. For example, some major<br />
suppliers of zinc plated grade 8 and PC 10.9 bolts bake and<br />
some do not. Those who do not bake have realized the<br />
benefit of controlling hardness in the mid or low range of the<br />
requirements so there is no risk of the odd lot or parts within<br />
a lot being in the susceptible hardness range. These<br />
suppliers obviously enjoy a competitive advantage<br />
compared to those who do bake.<br />
What Specifications Address Baking?<br />
The plating specification and/or the fastener<br />
specification will govern if baking is required or not. For most<br />
fasteners that are zinc plated, cadmium plated or zinc-nickel<br />
plated that specification will be ASTM F1941/F1941M or<br />
ISO 4042. All suppliers and users of plated fasteners<br />
should be thoroughly familiar with the plating specifications<br />
they use; this is especially critical for HE susceptible<br />
fasteners. Often it will be the fastener specification that<br />
requires baking such as ISO 898-1 for metric fasteners, or<br />
ASTM A574 for inch socket head cap screws which refers to<br />
the plating specification for baking requirements.<br />
Beware of inappropriate or obsolete specification callouts.<br />
The most current version of the specification should<br />
be used unless otherwise directed by the contract or order.<br />
ASTM F1941/F1941M has just recently undergone<br />
significant revisions. Be sure you have the 2015 version. A<br />
common zinc plating specification that we see on drawings<br />
for fasteners is ASTM B633. This is not the recommended<br />
specification for fasteners and requires unnecessary baking<br />
of some fasteners. It does refer users to ASTM<br />
F1941/F1941M for fasteners, so when you see ASTM<br />
B633 you should strongly direct your customer to ASTM<br />
F1941/F1941M and tell them not to use ASTM B633 for<br />
fasteners.<br />
CONTINUED ON PAGE 176